Is there really a Massive Flu Outbreak? Lies unravel Scandal

If there really is a “massive flu outbreak” – as all the mainstream news sources are telling us there is – chances are good that it has been caused by vaccinated people shedding the vaccine-unleashed virus, or by the flu vaccine itself causing flu-like symptoms.  Cogent arguments that question the flu vaccine’s effectiveness can be made given what we know of the vaccine’s faulty design (explained below), along with the CDC’s history of feeding us wild lies regarding deaths from the flu.  Worse, and what carries real freight in any argument questioning the effectiveness of the flu shot, is this: most cases reported as “the flu” are not the flu at all.

Flu Vaccine Industry Threatened by Science

It sounds insane, but it’s true, and no less a publication than the British Medical Journal has admitted it: The flu we thought we knew is usually not the flu.  This fact has been found by examining hundreds of thousands of people diagnosed with “the flu.”  The implications of that stagger the mind. They threaten the entire multi-billion-dollar flu shot industry, along with international drug cartels (legal in name only) like Merck (which also makes the dubious shingles vaccine) and GlaxoSmithKline, which have partnered with the CDC as well as U.S. politicians to sell us all the flu vaccine. The U.S. Government has spent billions of our tax dollars on less than worthless, but always potentially injurious, flu vaccines.

The Emotional Shot
The convoluted flu shot scandal cannot be explained in a palatable, Twitter-friendly sound bite; so most people will fail to read the fine print, just like most ignore the litany of those so-called “side effects” muttered at the end of a drug commercial.  Images of happy people playing flash in the mind, direct to the heart, to the emotional center, the reptilian hindbrain long on fear (and anger) and short on creative solutions. Better not to listen too attentively, or look too closely.  Better to let the emotions short-circuit the reasoning faculties, present the purest path to persuasion.

We accept the pretty pictures and ignore the muttered warnings at our peril.  100,000 people die every year from prescription drugs. The number injured from vaccinations is much higher, according to the Vaccine Adverse Reports System (VAERS), which all experts know records adverse events from a mere 1-10% of the actual total.  Those who don’t sicken quickly or drop dead in an obviously causal manner following vaccination may instead be struck with chronic illness, as any nasty vaccine adds a heavy load to the human body’s already toxic burden.

Flu Vaccine Causes Flu
Dr. Oz and Piers Morgan proved on national television that the flu “vaccine” causes the flu. Using Mr. Morgan as a guinea pig, the TV doctor had attempted to show us all that one cannot get the flu from the vaccine.  Mr. Morgan rolled up his sleeve on TV and Dr. Oz “inoculated” him with the influenza virus. And then God himself intervened. In a matter of days, the experiment wildly backfired. It succeeded only in revealing the larger truth, that the vaccine not only does not prevent the flu; the vaccine can and does cause the flu, or at least malicious symptoms which mimic “the flu.”

When the Flu is not the Flu
The term “the flu” always deserves quotation marks, because it turns out that what we usually call the flu is not the flu at all. It turns out that some 84% of people who were diagnosed with the flu did not have the flu at all.

Writing in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) online, Dr. Peter Doshi pulls back the CDC wizard’s curtain to reveal a monstrous fraud at work.  Dr. Doshi explains that hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients every year in the U.S. and tested in labs.  Of these “flu” samples, only a small percentage show the presence of an actual influenza virus.

Marketing Vaccines by Marketing Disease
Here’s the exact quote from Dr. Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):

“…[E]ven the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.”

(Cough, fever, chills, sore throat, muscle aches, weakness – all the basic flu symptoms can be caused by many factors that have nothing to do with a flu virus.)

Flu Vaccine Policies Based on Fiction

Dr. Doshi told the British Medical Journal that health officials “risk losing credibility by continuing to promote the fiction that mandatory influenza vaccine policies are based on solid evidence.  They are not, and it is time for healthcare institutions to do their own rigorous assessment of the evidence rather than continue this dangerous game of follow the leader.”

Sixteen Percent! (16%) Actually Have the Flue
This means that most Americans diagnosed by doctors with flu have no flu virus in their bodies. This means that most people who believe they have the flu, or who have been told by their doctors that they have the flu, do not have the flu.  (You can’t make this stuff up.)

As Jon Rappoport writes in nomorefakenews.com, “[E]ven if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those ‘flu cases’ that aren’t flu cases.”  That means the so-called “flu vaccine” could not possibly work.

Flu Vaccine 10% Effective
Health officials admit that this year’s flu vaccine is only 10% effective, yet they recommend you take the shot anyway. (Seriously? Seriously.) The shot is even less effective for the elderly, and has been so for the last several years, but that’s another fact you rarely, if ever, read or hear in the mainstream media putsch for total flu vaccine compliance. (Did you know some doctors are bonused by some insurance companies if they talk a certain percentage of their patients into vaccine compliance?) Elderly people taking the yearly flu shot also raise their risk of Alzheimer’s, likely because aluminum in the shot has been implicated in that disease. Children who take the flu shot are drastically more likely to suffer in any pandemic because the flu shot compromises their developing immune systems.  Any Science 101 class presented by any teacher with any basic understanding of biology would teach us that the flu shot does not strengthen the immune system; it weakens it, leaving any body tainted with the toxic flu vaccine cocktail at greater risk of contracting the disease du jour.

Virus Mutates in Chicken Eggs
Mr. Rappoport explains that this year’s flu vaccine is ineffective because of chicken eggs. Researchers have discovered that the flu virus placed in the vaccine mutates in chicken eggs. So by the time a person submits to the flu shot, she’s not being protected against this year’s seasonal flu virus. She’s being protected against a mutated virus that isn’t causing the flu this year. There’s a whole lot more to the story, of course – there always is with the “science” behind vaccination – but vaccines have been made using chicken eggs for the past 70 years. That means the flu vaccine has been ineffective for at least the last 70 years or so. That means the flu vaccine has NEVER worked as advertised.

The CDC’s Rank Dishonesty (Lying by any other name)
The CDC continues to push for mass vaccination by using the same basic tactic drug companies use to sell their dubious drugs: instill fear in the target.  In December 2005, the British Medical Journal online published another shocking report from Dr. Peter Doshi.  It’s one that should have put the Centers for Disease Control out of business, because CDC “experts” used to tell the press that the flu killed 36,000 Americans every year.

US Flu Deaths more PR than Science
Dr. Doshi’s report was titled, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412).  He wrote:

“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001 – 61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”

Did we read that right?

Like rolling a small pea under shuffling walnut shells, the CDC used a street-hustler’s sleight of hand to create one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths.  What?  Why? For what purpose?  For whose benefit?  (Most decidedly not ours.)  The CDC did it because they duplicitously and disingenuously make the absurd assumption that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.  It’s a glaring nonsensical non sequitur if ever there was one, because pneumonia has many causes.

18 Flu Deaths per Year (maybe), NOT 36,000

More pointedly, of all the flu and pneumonia deaths rolled into one big phony ball in a street hustler’s crooked game, a mere 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.

Therefore, the CDC could not say, with any assurance whatsoever, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001.  Total deaths from the flu was NOT 36,000. It was 18. Eighteen deaths.

Average of 1,350 flu deaths per year; NOT 36,000
Dr. Doshi continued his assessment of the CDC’s published flu-death statistics, in figures for flu separated out from pneumonia: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).”

This death toll is obviously far shy of the old 36,000 figure, and we don’t know how many of those flu deaths followed vaccination, or whether some or most of those 1,350 per year had been vaccinated.  This is one of the many glaring examples which shows the CDC actively engaged in promoting vaccination at the expense of the truth, and of our health, our lives.

And when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even further.

Cochrane: Widespread Manipulation on Influenza Vaccines

The Cochrane Collaboration reviewed all relevant data on flu vaccines. It concluded that there was considerable bias in prestigious journals towards studies funded by the very industry profiting from mass influenza vaccination. Cochrane found that influenza vaccine data was skewed by “widespread manipulation of conclusions.”  The Cochrane Collaboration concluded with a warning in all caps with bold letters.  Cochrane concluded, somewhat shockingly, by admitting that even their own bleak conclusions about the flu vaccine were shy of the real mark, given the bias in reporting from industry. It seems clear now that only industry bias keeps the whole flu shot scam afloat, like a cuttlefish squirting ink to hide from all those who would see it for what it is. The Cochrane Collaboration concluded its bleak influenza vaccine review with huge caveats.

“WARNING:

This review includes 15 out of 36 trials funded by industry (four had no funding declaration).  An earlier systematic review of 274 vaccine influenza studies published up to 2007 found industry funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological quality and size.  Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conditions favorable to the vaccines.  The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies.  The content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in light of this finding.”

Is there really a Massive Flu Outbreak? Lies unravel Scandal

The flu vaccine is all smoke and mirrors, promotion and hype, as the CDC – like the drug companies with which it partners – serves not us U.S. citizens but some other agenda.  Few in their right mind would submit to a flu shot if they knew just how dishonest the CDC has been in protecting our health, and how the flu shot has likely never worked as advertised and promoted by an unwavering propaganda campaign.

Related

Share

The Flu Vaccine Hoax is Over

The year 2017 brought a treasure trove of new scientific evidence that proves once and for all that the flu vaccine hoax is over.  If you believe the flu vaccine works and is worth the risks of taking it, you simply haven’t read the latest research.  If you rely primarily on mainstream news for your flu vaccine information, you do so at your peril.

Top Five Reasons Why the Flu vaccine is a Bad Choice:

1.  The flu vaccine doesn’t work because of the way it is developed.

2.  The flu jab raises the risk of catching other types of flu.

3.  The flu vaccine raises the risk of dementia.

4.  No scientific studies prove the flu vaccine has ever been worth the risks of taking it.

5.  No significant scientific studies prove that those who take the flu vaccine and then get the flu (often from the vaccine itself) suffer less debilitating symptoms than refusing the shot would have rendered.

Related:  Shingles Vaccine?  Really?

Fake Vaccine News from Media Partners
News doesn’t get any more fake than the tiresome advertorial blitzkreig used to sell the so-called flu vaccine every year.

The flu vaccination business is a multi-billion-dollar cash cow gobbled up and regurgitated by all major media. CBS, NBC, ABC, MSNBC, Fox News, CNN, The New York Times, TIME, Reuters, USA Today – pick your news poison: they all rely on millions of dollars in advertising from pharmaceutical companies. Big Pharma is their number one client advertiser, and nothing pays Big Pharma like cheap vaccines. Cheap for them, as most are made in China (which has killed our pets with poisoned dog food, sickened us in our homes with toxic drywall; yet we trust the communist Chinese to pump mercury, aluminum, squaline and other toxins directly into our bloodstreams?)  Not so cheap for us, as we suffer the long-term costs of the flu shot to our financial, physical and emotional health.

Related:  Enormous Lies about Basic Vaccination

Vaccine Makers Vaccinated against Liability
Unlike other drug company products, vaccines offer a get-out-of-jail free card for vaccine makers, which have been vaccinated against liability by U. S. Government fiat, via the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Act.  Consequently, vaccine makers have nearly zero incentive to make vaccines safe and effective.  That little “detail” probably explains why no vaccine has ever been proven safe and effective. In 2017, Robert De Niro and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. offered a $100,000 reward to anyone who can prove any vaccine is safe and effective. Nobody has been able to do so and claim the reward.

Vaccine Industry Whitewashes Problems
What passes for government vaccine science is in reality propaganda produced by a corporate partnership between drug companies, the CDC, and mainstream media. There is no conspiracy here, folks.  It is an open secret.  Once something becomes a multi-billion-dollar industry, it takes on a life of its own, as it employs so many thousands of people with vested interests in maintaining the status quo.  (Somebody’s baby always needs new shoes.)

The CDC, in fact, uses our tax dollars to fund pro-vaccine groups  and trolls that ignore the latest science as they spew propaganda and misinformation online.

1. The flu vaccine doesn’t work because of the way it is developed.
As Jon Rappoport explains in a Nov. 2017 blog, referencing a PLOS Journal story published earlier that month, the chicken eggs used for culturing clinical isolates and for vaccines don’t work because “the influenza virus often mutates to adapt to being grown in chicken eggs, which can influence antigenicity and hence vaccine effectiveness.”

In addition, only a small percentage of the hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples taken from sick people every year contain the flu virus. This sounds insane but it’s true, and it knocks any notion of the flu vaccine’s effectiveness right out of the park.  Most diagnosis of the flu are not the flu, and there is no evidence whatsoever that taking a flu shot to check the influenza virus does anything at all to affect all those unknown sicknesses that are not the flu.

In fact, the opposite is true.  Taking the flu vaccine has been show to raise the risk of susceptibility to other viruses, like all of those who are sick with something besides the flu who are convinced it is the flu that they have.

2. The flu jab raises the risk of catching other types of flu. Vaccines suppress the immune system, period.  The long-term result is a weakened immune system which leaves the influenza jabbed person vulnerable to other types of flu, which are legion.

3. The flu jab raises the risk of dementia. The flu vaccine is laced with mercury, a known neurotoxin for which no safe dose exists.  It also contains aluminum, linked with Alzheimer’s, and glyphosate, implicated in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and kidney and liver problems.

4. No scientific study proves the flu vaccine is worth the risks of taking it. In fact, in almost any honest assessment, the flu shot has been shown to be virtually useless for the elderly. The flu vaccine has recently been implicated in miscarriages for pregnant women taking the shot. Few things are more insane than vaccinating a pregnant woman with anything, yet the CDC recommends that pregnant women take the flu shot. It would be laughable if it weren’t downright criminal to recommend such a thing.  See Dr. Russell Blaylock on vaccinating pregnant women.

5. No significant scientific studies prove that those who take the flu vaccine and then get the flu (perhaps from the vaccine itself) suffer less debilitating symptoms than not taking the shot would have rendered.  Even in the disinformation and misinformation and all the propaganda that litters the web from the CDC and other vaccine pushers, the best you will find is that taking the flu jab “may reduce” the symptoms if one then gets the flu. The American Society for Microbiology floats this  study after looking at only 155 people. Long recognized as an absurdity by thinking people, the vaccine industry finally realized they needed some evidence, however flimsy, to show the symptoms for the vaccinated were less severe. So they’ve come up with this little tidbit, that the vaccine may (italics ours) reduce the severity of flu symptoms.

That’s the best they’ve got?  Yeah, that’s the best they’ve got.  May is a well-known weasel word long used and abused by advertisers and snake oil salesmen of every stripe to appear to be making a claim.  In reality, may makes no claim at all.  It’s toothless propaganda.

The Flu Vaccine Hoax is Over
With the end of net neutrality ushered in by the FCC with a 3-2 vote along party lines last month, it will become harder and harder to dig out the truth of the ineffectiveness and the dangers of the flu vaccine on the web, but we must keep trying.  Our survival depends on it.  The end game for all of this vaccine propaganda and disinformation is to eventually force vaccination on all of us.  They’ve already killed informed consent in California.  Let’s wake up in 2018, before it’s too late to protect our inalienable rights.

Related

Share

Vaccination Truth, Fake News, Internet Freedom

Vaccination truth is tightly tied with the current fight for net neutrality.  Corporations threatened by the truth want to slow it down on your browser, or make it disappear from google search results altogether. Those who do not have the truth on their side must resort to propaganda, either to control the spin or to turn black into white, war into peace, death into liberation. Already organic search results will bring up disinformation sites (like the dreadful ‘Snopes,’ for one).  In very recent history, fake news outlets like CNN, CBS, the Washington Post, New York Times and many other mainstream outlets delivered shameless propaganda, pure lies, to help war profiteers manufacture a casus belli for the Iraq invasion.  There are few crimes more treasonous or serious than manufacturing a fake casus belli which commits your country to an ill-advised war. For outlets like these, proven news fakers, to call fake news on legitimate “alternative news” sources (isn’t whatever one chooses to watch an ‘alternative’?) is quite simply ludicrous. (CNN’s latest lie is simply another in an endless litany.)

The old weapons of mass destruction lie regarding Iraq, which all the mainstream outlets repeated despite any evidence to back it, got our country into its longest-running war.  It has resulted in the deaths of at least a million people who never did us any harm, nor even had the means to do so. The fake news that sealed our fate and stole our nation’s bounty has also made our country an international pariah.   We could not have been brought this low without the aid of fake news.  Wrap yourself in Old Glory and bang your chest all you want and hate some enemies (real or imagined) as you will, nobody in this world survives without friends.  We have been made decidedly poorer, morally and financially, all of us, thanks in large part to our fake news outlets, which continue to misinform and disinform us daily, about almost everything.

The Truth Spills Out Regardless
The truth, regardless of the sea of fake news that never ends on our “Smart” TV screens and much of the internet, has a funny way of spilling out.  Corporations know this. The fight over net neutrality is a fight for truth vs. propaganda. If corporations have their way, they will slow down any and all information that doesn’t back their bottom line. The current battle over internet freedom is also a watershed moment for vaccination truth.

Follow the Money

The vaccine market today is worth close to $24 billion.  A report titled ‘Global Human Vaccines Market 2016-2020’ gives an in-depth view of the possible revenues and emerging global market trends.  It says that by 2020 the vaccine market will be worth $62 billion.  That much money will buy a lot of advertising, and friendly promotional coverage.

No Conspiracy. An Open Secret.
The internet has taught us all many things that we likely would not have learned otherwise. The internet is obviously a huge moneymaker for corporations, but it is also a two-edged sword for them. The fight for vaccination truth is one very big front in this battle. The U.S. government has paid out billions of dollars to vaccine-injured children and their families saddled with vaccine-crippled children, but they never run that story in the mainstream news. Why not? Conspiracy? No, it’s all an open secret.

Vaccination Lies Promoted, Covered up by CDC, Big Pharma, MSM
Whistleblowers at the CDC and former employees of Merck Pharmaceuticals have shown us that we are being lied to about the safety and efficacy of vaccination. One fugitive author of a fraudulent vaccine safety report still used by the CDC to justify forced vaccination on our children is still at large, while his handiwork, his web of lies, is still used by the CDC to justify mass vaccination.

Shingles Vaccine Lawsuits
Meanwhile, shingles vaccine lawsuits are being filed by people who have lost their eyesight from the live shingles vaccination made by Merck. Many have developed shingles FROM the vaccination, just as many develop flu from the influenza vaccine (so-called).

Flu Vaccine causes Flu
Piers Morgan showed us how to develop flu from vaccination on national television. He took the flu shot from Dr. Oz on his show. The two were supposed to show all of us yokels how the flu shot not only did not cause the flu, but was safe and would prevent it. The little tableaux accidentally gave the whole game away when Morgan soon came down with the flu after taking the shot. Dwight Yoakum joked with him about it on a subsequent episode. He must not have gotten the memo to keep that on the down low.

Sacrifice the Children?
What gives? Are the vaccine injured children sacrifices we give to the Gods to keep the rest of us healthy, like Druids throwing children into the bog so that the Gods may grant us fecundity?  Is it all okay just so long as you and your children submit to the government-approved vaccinations and are not (apparently) injured by them?

Vaccines are Safe and Effective Myth
The biggest, most tiresome myth we endlessly hear is that vaccines are safe and effective. Vaccines are not safe, as even a casual reading of any vaccine package insert reveals. Thousands of adverse events from vaccination are reported to the VAERS database each year, including many deaths following vaccination. The numbers reported to VAERS are merely 1-10% of the actual adverse events. Everyone who knows anything about vaccination or adverse drug events knows this is true. Therefore, there are a bare minimum of 10,000 adverse events from vaccination yearly, and likely more than 100,000.

Congress: Vaccines Unavoidably Unsafe
The U.S. Congress, which gave us the 1984 Childhood Immunization Act – which vaccinated vaccine makers against liability, hence removing any incentive they had to actually make vaccines safe OR effective – has called vaccines “unavoidably unsafe.”  How can vaccines be both safe (as most of our doctors tell us they are) and unavoidably unsafe?  Why do we accept these blatant contradictions as some sort of gospel truth?  How can we?  Have we all mastered the absurd art of “Doublespeak” as seen in George Orwell’s 1984?  Do we take our shots and risk our health and lives, and the lives of our children, because fake news master CNN says so? Because Fox News reporters say so? Because Rachel Maddow says we should? Because Comedy Central makes fun of “anti-vaxxers”? Do we accept as science today whatever our mainstream outlets – be they left or right leaning – say is science?

Vaccines are not Effective
No definitive science has ever shown that any vaccine has ever been proven effective on human beings. There is no definitive science which proves any vaccines is effective, that any vaccine actually works, that any one vaccine is worth the risk of taking it. So how does it come to pass then, that vaccine makers and their partner, the CDC – which owns 57 vaccine patents itself, is also in the business of vaccination, part of the market supply chain – how DO they claim vaccines are effective?

Vaccine Safety Depends on the Meaning of “is”
It is more than a little like Bill Clinton saying, “It depends on what the meaning of is is.” In the vaccine makers world – a parallel universe ungoverned by sensibility, honesty, or practicality – a vaccine is said to be “effective” when it can be shown to trigger antibodies to the disease the vaccinated person has been shot with. But. . . wait for it. The presence of antibodies in no way correlates with immunity. That’s right. There is NO scientific evidence anywhere to prove that simply producing antibodies as a result of the artificial immunity resulting from vaccination gives one any immunity at all, to anything.

Vaccine Autism Link
It is a well accepted myth that vaccines don’t cause autism. Why is that? Vaccines DO cause autism, and the U.S. Government has admitted it. The government has paid vaccine-injured children and the parents of those poor children who developed autism following vaccination. Our government has paid out more than $3 billion dollars for vaccine-related injuries, including those in which vaccines were linked with autism. See it here: Project Censored: U.S. Vaccine Court paid $3 Billion to Vaccine Injured Families

Vaccine Autism Link is Real
In March, 2008 the U.S. Government conceded that mercury containing vaccines can cause autism in children.

A child named Hannah Poling got autism from vaccinations. At 18 months old, she was given shots for nine diseases. Two shots contained thimerosal. Within 48 hours of the shots, Hannah became ill. She lost her ability to walk. She couldn’t sleep through a night. Within three months, she showed signs of autism. The shots resulted in a brain disorder “with features of autism spectrum disorder.” (That’s as close as they ever get to admitting it, hedging as much as they can to help continue the tiresome ruse.) The US Department of Health and Human Services determined that Hannah’s family is entitled to compensation from the federal vaccine injury fund. Put together by the U.S. Congress in 1984 to save drug companies from real liability, this “fund” is built on taxpayer money made from the sale of toxic vaccines. More than 5,000 vaccine autism cases are pending right now in the Federal “Vaccine Court.”

The Danish Study Hoax still cited by CDC and MSM
Fugitive Poul Thorsen is the “author” of the Danish Autism Study (a complete myth) that attempted to prove vaccines and autism have no correlation; scientifically referred to as the “Denmark Study.” After using fraudulent data to distort the truth about the human health dangers of being injected with mercury in vaccines, and more specifically the MMR vaccine combination, Thorsen, leader of the fraudulent study, was deified by the CDC as a genius who had discovered something monumental. Then. . . Newsflash! It was all shown to be a big cover up, which the CDC is still using so it doesn’t have to admit its own research had found out about the autism/mercury link back in 2004. See also the William Thompson whistleblower case shown in the film Vaxxed.

Vaccination Truth, Fake News, Internet Freedom

Here’s the punch line. Even though Thorsen is a wanted criminal today, for embezzlement, he remains even now as the central figure behind the CDC’s claims disputing the link between autism spectrum disorder (the whole array of central nervous system, neurological and brain dysfunctions) and mercury in vaccines (and flu shots-still). Even now. So the CDC is now just as guilty of fake news as the mainstream media news fakers.

Related

•  Vaccine Lottery: Sacrifice the Children

•  Shingles Vaccine?  Really?

•  Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit

•   True Disclosure.: The Real vaccine Story

•  Vaccination Truth, Fake News, Internet Freedom

Share

Nurses fired for fighting Vaccine Mandates

More people arguably die from taking the flu shot – or are injured by it – than die from the flu each season. But that hasn’t stopped hospitals from forcing flu shots on their employees.  Some are fighting back.  Many nurses who have seen vaccine damaged people up close are fighting back. The nurses are claiming their right to informed consent, which is the first rule of medicine.  Informed consent is also a basic human right. Nazi doctors who experimented on prisoners were executed for violating that rule in WWII.  Removing  informed consent violates the Nuremberg Code, which begins with informed consent. Nevertheless,  nurses are now being fired for having the temerity to claim that basic right.  How have we reached this tipping point?

Vaccine Damage trumps Fear-Mongering Propaganda

More and more people are discovering that vaccination can come with a litany of dangerous health problems which can be much worse than whatever malady the vaccine maker claims its vaccine will prevent.  Big Pharma’s answer to this elephant in the room that threatens billions of dollars in profits has been to have congress vaccinate them against liability lawsuits.  Their next move was to have those same congressional lackeys force vaccination on more and more people.  This represents quite a nice little business model.  Unless one traffics in illegal weapons’ sales or illicit drugs, there’s not a better one in the world.  Mandatory vaccination means nearly limitless profits with near zero accountability.

Secret Vaccine Court works outside Democratic Law

Yes, the so-called “vaccine court,” a secret government tribunal that allows plaintiffs no discovery, has paid out more than $3 billion to vaccine-injured children or their surviving families. That “court,” however, refuses to pay nearly 80 percent of its claimants.  The victims are mostly made toothless by being forbidden to conduct legal discovery.  Anyone not allowed legal discovery faces a nearly insurmountable task of proving up a case.

Is there a Safe Vaccine Anywhere?

Any real court which would give vaccine-injured plaintiffs a chance to prove up their cases.  That would give the whole vaccine game away.  Robert DeNiro (who has a vaccine-injured son) and Robert Kennedy, Jr. offered up a $100,000 reward to anyone who can prove any vaccine safe and effective.  That reward goes unclaimed.  No science exists to prove any vaccine is safe or effective. Congress, in one of its rare truthful moments, has called vaccination “unavoidably unsafe.”

Simple refusal to let somebody shoot a witches’ brew of toxins (mercury, aluminum, squaline, pig cells, etc.) into your bloodstream should suffice to end the discussion. But unfortunately, it no longer does. More and more states are falling in line with the great nanny state of California.  Meanwhile, the nurses’ refusal to claim their rights is costing many of them their jobs. Why is this huge story being buried by the mainstream media? Follow the money.

Money Drives Vaccine Mandates
Anything that doesn’t help promote mass vaccination, that doesn’t support state-sponsored propaganda that all vaccines are safe and effective, fails to make the news. The news is mostly paid for by Big Pharma advertising dollars, by the same companies that make billions of dollars from forcing vaccinations on people That’s not mere cynicism talking. That’s life. Truth.

Most people tend to believe whatever they think is in their best interests. Corporations think the same way, in spades, the only difference being that they have the money to control the debate and further their own interests. Big Pharma has used its billions in profits to buy news outlets, politicians, judges, bloggers, all manner of internet trolls, and what else you got? (Are you an out- of-work writer? Look around and you can easily find a job as an internet troll. How tough can it be to tell people they are nuts for thinking vaccination is related to autism, or any other health problem, despite thousands of parents reporting that they saw it with their own eyes. All you need do is repeat the propaganda that there is no evidence vaccines cause autism. If they point out a former CDC scientist, William Thompson has blown the whistle on the agency’s faking the data which did show a vaccine autism link, you can just ignore that fact and carry on repeating your talking points, the same ones used all over the mainstream media.)

Advertising Money Screams

John Lennon said money doesn’t talk, it screams.  That was never truer than with advertising money.  Merck, makers of the dangerous MMR vaccine and the worthless but dangerous shingles vaccine, spent $205.5 million on advertising in 2014: $95 million on TV ads, $74.1 in magazines, $35 million in newspapers, $467,000 in radio (a half million is plenty for radio; nobody listens to it anymore).

More than $205 million in advertising money will easily buy you what marketers call “complementary copy.” It can also buy you silence, or a serious slant against anything that threatens the vaccine gravy train. It’s like the old joke about borrowing money from a bank. If you borrow enough, the banker becomes your partner. Advertisers with enough money become partners with the media they support. It is a very simple formula. There’s no conspiracy theory here. It is an open secret. But it’s not too secret.

In our age, if you don’t like a fact, you can just pay some money and make it go away.  Those with enough money can make something seem true even if it’s not.  (See also:  Operation Mckingbird, which continues today).  If you own enough congressmen, you may even be able to convince some people that we invaded Iraq to implant democracy there, that we do “regime change” in other countries because we think that’s what is best for them, or that “Citizen’s United,” letting the Koch brothers and other corporate chieftains spend unaccountable millions in state and national elections, has been good for the country.

The nanny state of California began this outrage. California legislators removed informed consent for childhood vaccinations, hence forcing a long list of vaccines on their schoolchildren. It fails to make the mainstream news that the list of mandated vaccines grows longer and longer yearly, in direct proportion to American schoolchildren growing sicker and sicker. It also fails to make the news that Big Pharma lobbyists work hand in fist with the CDC and the money-hungry U.S. Congress, lengthening that list every year, to further pad drug maker profits for Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and other vaccine profiteers.

Nurses fired for fighting Vaccine Mandates

Nevertheless, many people are still fooled by the ludicrous claim that when they get the flu after taking the shot, the “symptoms” are not as bad as they would have been had they not taken the shot.  These are likely the same people who watch infomercials, or sit in the audiences of them, mouths agape, to help sell products to easily duped others.

Related

•  Vaccination History, Thinking Person

•  Flu Vaccine Deaths Mount

•  Shingles Vaccine? Really?

•  Shingles Vaccine eye Damage

•  Vaccine Hysteria Reigns

•  Mother Jailed for Refusing Vaccinations

•  Nurses fired for fighting Vaccine Mandates

Share

Flu Vaccine Fails Again in Latest Study

Flu vaccine makers know something you don’t.  Nobody would take the flu shot if all the facts were made clear.  If it weren’t for complete corporate control of the mainstream media and endless propaganda pushing the flu shot and other vaccines, nobody in her right mind would take a flu vaccine.  The latest study over the flu vaccine shows not only that it fails to protect most of the time for most people who take it, but also why it fails.

Conducted by the Scripps Research Institute and published in the science journal PloS, this study explains why people would be wise to educate themselves before lining up for their flu shots. The paper is titled: “A structural explanation for the low effectiveness of the seasonal influenza H3N2 vaccine.” It concludes that the very method of modern flu vaccine production causes viral strains to mutate to non-effective structures that do not confer the immunity being routinely claimed for flu vaccines.  This should and would be front-page news if the real fake news makers weren’t posing as real news outlets.

Related:  Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit

The production method for flu vaccines, the authors concluded, renders certain influenza viral strains nearly useless. This is clearly part of the reason why those who submit to flu shots still manage to catch the flu with alarming frequency. The failure of flu vaccine effectiveness, meanwhile, (and absurdly), is used by mainstream media to encourage people to take even more flu shots. Does receiving more of what doesn’t work help anything? The flu shot does help the flu vaccine industry, because those who take the flu shot shed the virus and infect others, before they often get the flu themselves.  Those “outbreaks” are trumped up and trumpeted by MSM, so that people stampede to Walgreens for a flu shot to continue the cycle.

The Study Abstract
The study abstract reads: The effectiveness of the annual influenza vaccine has declined in recent years, especially for the H3N2 component, and is a concern for global public health. A major cause for this lack in effectiveness has been attributed to the egg-based vaccine production process… Overall, these findings help explain the low effectiveness of the seasonal vaccine against H3N2 viruses… It is common to use chicken eggs for culturing clinical isolates and for large-scale production of vaccines.  However, influenza virus often mutates to adapt to being grown in chicken eggs, which can influence antigenicity and hence vaccine effectiveness.

The author’s summary makes clear that flu vaccines don’t work, and then urges the vaccine industry to change its production practices pronto:

“Our study describes a mechanism for the low influenza vaccine effectiveness and reaffirms the urgency for replacing the egg-based production of influenza vaccines…”

The author even admits that the flu vaccine propaganda which bombards us is largely false. Despite the first commercial influenza vaccines being approved in the US more than 70 years ago, complete and broad protection from an influenza vaccine has remained out of reach.  In the past decade, the effectiveness of the seasonal vaccine against H3N2 viruses has been particularly low.

The paper clearly exposes two absurd claims from the flu vaccine industry:
False claim #1: All vaccines work on all the people all the time.
False claim #2: Vaccines pose no risks and are always safe for everyone.

These two undying lies continue to be pushed by vaccine industry shills, trolls, doctors, pharmacists, no-nothing “news reporters” and dishonest medical quacks.  Many die of the flu after taking the flu shot, and the U.S. government has paid out more than $3 billion in the last 20 years to the families of children injured or killed by vaccines.

The flu vaccine label even ADMITS that no study has been done to show the vaccine to be effective.

144 Kids Killed by Vaccines in 2016
The U.S. government’s VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System) database confirms that at least 144 children were killed by vaccines in 2016 alone. Thousands more were injured, maimed or sickened by the dangerous shots. One Texas girl went blind and was paralyzed just two days after being vaccinated. The Hepatitis B vaccine routinely kills newborns from system shock.  Vaccines have been repeatedly and scientifically linked to an increased risk of autism, despite the MSM’s endless lies to the contrary.  (See the film:  Vaxxed.) Merck vaccines reportedly killed babies in Mexico.  Health Ranger Mike Adams reports that in one Mexican town, 75% of the children who received vaccine shots ended up either dead or hospitalized.

Vaccine insert sheets openly admit that flu shots have never been subjected to medical studies that show they even work. Mr. Adams found this insert sheet from a 2014 Flulaval vaccine:

The insert sheet admits:

“…there have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FLULAVAL.”

If you keep reading the FLULAVAL insert, black and white text clearly states:  “Safety and effectiveness of FLULAVAL in pediatric patients have not been established.”  How can we give kids a flu vaccine when “safety and effectiveness have not been established”?

The same insert also admits, “FLULAVAL has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.”  The insert also explains that when you’re being injected with a flu shot, you’re also being injected with mercury, formaldehyde and other toxic ingredients:

“Thimerosal, a mercury derivative, is added as a preservative. Each … dose contains 50 mcg thimerosal. Each dose may also contain residual amounts of ovalbumin, formaldehyde, and sodium deoxycholate from the manufacturing process.”

Flu shot “side effects” include (but are not limited to):
Eye pain, chest pain
Arthritis
Dizziness, tremors, loss of consciousness (syncope)
Convulsions and seizures
Gullain-Barre Syndrome
Cranial nerve paralysis or limb paralysis
Swelling of the brain
Partial facial paralysis

The Flulaval flu shot even warns that you should never give it to anyone who has previously had a different flu shot, even in previous years:

“Do not administer Flulaval to anyone… following previous administration of any influenza vaccine.”

The real science proves flu shots are little more than medical fraud or outright superstition. The science for taking the flu shot is not on the side of safety and efficacy.  We must educate ourselves.  Our lives depend on it.  It’s all about fear for those endlessly pushing the flu shot.  Let it be all about science and truth for those of us with the courage and wisdom to find them.

Related

Share

Flu Shots Weaken Immune Response

Flu shots weaken immune system response in subsequent years, according to the latest research.  People hoodwinked into taking flu shots every year by their doctors, along with heavy advertising campaigns from Big Pharma and the CDC may want to take heed. That flu shot taken this year will weaken the immune system for next year’s “flu season.”

(And just coincidentally, what many think is the “flu” taking hold of them may not be an influenza virus at all. Another recent flu shot study showed that only 18% of people who reported that they had the flu actually had the virus in them.)

Related: More than 100 Seniors Die after Flu Shot from Pharmacies

The latest eye-opening medical study on the flu vaccine was conducted at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. The study found women who submitted to flu vaccines displayed a weakened immune system response in subsequent years.

Head Researcher: Lower Antibody Responses
The head researcher in the study, Dr. Lisa Christian, said, “Growing evidence shows that those who received a flu shot in the prior year have lower antibody responses in the current year.”

This latest flu shot study demonstrates once again that the official story we hear every year from the vaccine industry, the CDC, and the mainstream media, is not to be trusted.  Sadly, it seems one must be a scientist today to determine whether or not to submit to a particular vaccine.

Flu Shot and VAERS Database
In addition to this latest bombshell, there are plenty of other reasons to question the safety and efficacy of the flu shot.  Far from even being as safe as advertised, the flu shot is responsible for more adverse events reported to VAERS – the Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System – than any other vaccine.

Need a Flu Shot? Need a Hole in the Head?
What possible sense could it make to take any sort of vaccine that makes one more susceptible to that sickness than less susceptible? Given the facts, one needs a flu shot like one needs a hole in the head. And even if it’s all about fear for those promoting the flu shot (and it is), then how about facing the real, proven fear that one is more susceptible to a sickness the more one is exposed to the so-called “flu vaccine”?  Ludicrous is not a strong enough adjective to explain the behavior of anyone taking a flu shot given these latest facts.  Insane is the only word that applies.  And what of all those poor nurses and others who work in the hospital systems who are forced by terms of their employment to take the less-than-worthless flu shot?  Do we live in a sane world that operates on reason?  Or does money really do most the talking where the “healthcare” field is concerned?

Remember those absurd arguments from parents who tell the parents of unvaccinated children to keep their kids away from the vaccinated darlings?  Well, here’s something to consider along the same line of reasoning.  When someone takes a flu shot, we now know that they are not only raising their own risk of getting the flu, they are walking around with an activated flu virus potentially infecting everyone with whom they come in contact.  So not only are those taking the less-than-worthless flu shot lowering their own immunity and endangering themselves, they are endangering others with their ignorance of the facts.

More Flu Shots = Less Protection from Flu
Here’s the score then:  The more flu shots one takes, the more susceptible one is to acquiring the full-blown flu.  Yes, incredibly, the flu shots themselves are leading to an increase in influenza infections.  This is a self-defeating spiral of insanity that enriches drug companies and the CDC (which owns some 57 vaccine patents) while making us all sicker.  The flu vaccine only helps perpetuate the myth that flu vaccines are needed by ensuring influenza spreads more rapidly than it would otherwise.  As Mike Adams of Natural News writes: “Flu vaccines spread the very infections that generate more demand for flu vaccines.”

Mr. Adams (who has been censored by Google) also gives us these gems re: the flu shot:

  • People who submitted to a 2008 flu shot suffered a 250% increase in influenza infections in subsequent years.
  • A study published in Human & Environmental Toxicology found that mercury-laced flu vaccines caused a 4,250 percent increase in fetal deaths during the 2009 flu season.
  • The flu shot narrative pushed by the vaccine industry is a medical hoax that’s easily disproved by fact-based evidence.
  • People who take flu shots will be the first to go in an actual global pandemic because they have been made vulnerable to infections.

Mainstream Media Pushes Flu Shots
Indeed, all is not as it appears in reports from the mainstream media.  If the powers that run the media really cared about the health of all of us on earth, they would give us honest reporting about the flu vaccine.  You will not see this latest research honestly reported in the MSM.   And the flu vaccine is hardly the only dubious “vaccine” on the market.

Shingles Vaccine Problems
The shingles vaccine has been shown to give people shingles, or to damage a person’s eyesight.  It too, is a dubious vaccine which a person would be wise to research before blindly submitting to (pun intended).  Our law firm has heard from more than one person who reported going blind, or nearly blind in one eye, shortly after submitting to the shingles vaccine.

Related

Share

Flu vaccines don’t work for elderly, says latest science

Flu vaccines don’t work for elderly people, says the latest science.   Tracey Watson reported on Sept. 19, 2017 that there has been a total media blackout over this news.  One can only wonder why.  Don’t the elderly deserve to know this information?  There has also been a near total  blackout on the troubling shingles vaccine that fails 98-99% of the elderly.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),  decides the national vaccination schedule “recommended” for children.  The CDC notes that those most at risk of complications from the flu virus are children younger than 5, and especially those under 2; pregnant women; people in nursing homes; and adults over 65.  The elderly are therefore among the most vulnerable members of society to influenza. The problem is that the flu shot last year was again determined to be ineffective for the elderly.

Public Health England (PHE) released a recent report that says, even though the flu shot seems to have been slightly more effective at preventing influenza among children than in the past, last year’s flu shot was totally ineffective for the elderly.

Flu Vaccine fails to thwart most common Strain

Vaccine “experts” believe the shot was ineffective because it failed to protect against the H3 strain, the most common circulating flu strain.  The flu shot is at best a game of chance each year.  “Experts” must attempt to predict which of three strains of the flu virus will be in circulation the next winter.  Even in a good year, their strike rate is a woeful 50 percent.

But that doesn’t mean CDC officials ever admit when a vaccine is ineffective or even useless.  In the case of the elderly, vaccine health professionals blame the elderly themselves.  A representative of PHE told BBC News: “As people age, their immune systems are often weaker and therefore their bodies may not respond as well to a vaccine as younger people’s bodies.”

Doubling Down on a Failed Flu Vaccine
Instead of admitting defeat, then, and encouraging seniors to pursue proven natural flu prevention paths, health officials just continue to push the flu shot.  Yes, despite the flu vaccine’s failure to help the elderly, vaccine “experts” still recommend older people take the flu jab again and again.

Mr. Watson points out that this is like saying, “The flu shot is useless for you and we know it, but you need to have it anyway.”  The so-called medical “experts” have even decided to double down on the insanity.  They have introduced “high-dose jabs that work to boost the body’s immune response to receiving the vaccine.”

Doubly Useless Flu Shots for Elderly
It’s hard to follow the logic, because there’s no logic to follow.  This is like saying, “The flu jab is useless for you and we know it, so we’re going to make it twice as useless.  Just keep quiet and take the jab.”  Meanwhile, thanks in part to the levels of mercury and/or aluminum and other “adjuvants” in flu shots, one’s risk of suffering from Alzheimer’s tends to rise with the number of flu shots one has taken over the years.

Flu vaccines don’t work for elderly, says latest science

Tracy Watson does offer some helpful news, “at least four easy, natural and effective ways to work with your body to build up your immune system and prevent the flu”: 1.) sunlight (Vitamin D3); 2.) Astragalus (a staple of ancient Ayurvedic and Chinese medicine); 3.) Echinacea and golden seal (powerful immune boosters); 4.) lifestyle and dietary changes (exercise, clean water, good sleep, controlled stress, fresh, organic fruits and vegetables).

RELATED

Share

20 Vaccine Documentaries that show the Big Picture

Scientists, doctors, researchers, writers and parents have produced at least 20 vaccine documentaries that show the big picture of this troubling controversy.  More and more parents are starting to figure out the anomalies and the contradictions and the outright lies of vaccination promoters as they watch their vaccinated children descend into chronic sickness. Recent studies show unvaccinated children are healthier than vaccinated ones; but you won’t find that story in mainstream “news.”

Related:  Vaccine Lottery:  Sacrifice the Children

More and more people who take the time to study the issue are figuring out that the CDC has lied to them. They have figured out that many of their doctors have unwittingly lied to them, mostly because their doctors don’t know anything about the history of vaccination or what is actually contained IN the vaccinations.  Talking television heads have lied to them.  Local newscasters have lied to them.

Vaccines are not the panacea they’ve been painted to be in the mainstream press controlled by drug company profits. The only way anyone can find the truth about vaccines is to see the injuries in their own children, which thousands and thousands of parents have done.  Or else they can research the web, study the history of vaccination, and look to see if anyone has ever done a legitimate double-blind study that proves the safety and effectiveness of even one single vaccine.

Related:  Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit

The vaccination blitz may not have begun as a cash cow making test monkeys out of most of its citizens.  The initial putsch for vaccination seems to have started with good intentions.  But do good intentions translate to positive results?  If only it were so!

“Most of the evil in this world is done by people with good intentions.” ― T.S. Eliot

Drug company executives extorted Congress back in the 1980s to give vaccine makers immunity from criminal prosecution or civil liability when they make vaccines that injure or kill children. Congress blinked and gave the vaccine profiteers virtual blanket immunity from liability, passing the so-called 1986 National Childhood Immunization Act.  Like the infamous “Citizen’s United,” or the notorious “Clean Skies” initiative, or “Operation Iraqi Freedom” (changed from the too-coy “Operation Iraqi Liberation” or OIL), the nomenclature is a duplicitous shield hiding a more troubling agenda.

Related:  Five Most Dangerous Vaccines

The so-called National Childhood Immunization Act shields drug companies from liability when their vaccines injure or kill children forced to take vaccines.  One dollar of profit from every vaccine goes into a fund, supposedly to help the children injured by vaccines.  This already creates an immediate problem for vaccine pushers an profiteers like Paul Offit, who endlessy tell us vaccines are completely safe and that autism is not caused by vaccines.  This big lie obtains today despite the fact that more than $3 billion has been paid from this fund to vaccine-injured children and their families.  Sadly, the fund recompenses only a tiny percentage of  parents and children injured or killed by vaccines.  The government realized early on that the fund didn’t collect enough money to compensate all the vaccine victims ; so it quickly moved to disallow Legal Discovery in vaccine cases and to simply deny some 80% of the claims in the secret and demonstrably undemocratic “Vaccine Court.”

Vaccine injuries are wiping out more and more families, crippling them emotionally and financially by autism and other vaccine-related injuries.  But those unfortunates do have one advantage over many.  They have seen the light.  They KNOW what caused their children’s injuries. Their eyes have been opened to how the world works (or doesn’t).  The rest of us need to open our own eyes before it’s too late for us and for our children, or our neighbor’s children.  We will all continue to pay as the rate of autism and vaccine injuries increases exponentially every year, in direct proportion to CDC mandates that require more and more childhood vaccinations be forced into our pin-cushion kids.  Rather than work as a watchdog for taxpayers, the CDC works as a partner with vaccine makers to promote vaccine policy and continue to raise the number of vaccines it requires children to take.

At least 20 must-see vaccine documentaries have been noted by Natural News, a web site that  Google and Facebook are trying to silence as Fake News.  Wise people will decide for themselves what fake news is, instead of getting censored search engine results.

20 Vaccine Documentaries that show the Big Picture

Please watch these documentaries and decide for yourself.

1. Vaccination – The Silent Epidemic

2. The Greater Good

3. Shots In The Dark

4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth

5. Vaccine Nation

6. Vaccination – The Truth About Vaccines

7. Lethal Injection

8. Bought

9. Deadly Immunity – Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

10. Autism – Made in the USA

11. Beyond Treason

12. Trace Amounts

13. Why We Don’t Vaccinate

14. Autism Yesterday

15. Denmark Documentary on HPV Vaccine

16. Vaxxed

17. Man Made Epidemic

18. 50 Cents A Dose

19. Direct Orders

20. Dtap – Vaccine Roulette

21. Truthstream News: About All Those Vaccines

RELATED

Share

Fake Vaccine News, Fake Studies, Fake Advocates

Fake vaccine news, fake studies, fake advocates dominate so-called real news.  First and most pointedly, in California.  The golden state is ground zero for the mandatory (Read: forced) vaccination of schoolchildren.  The state was the first to kill informed consent for parents and their children.  Led by Merck Pharmaceutical darling Senator Richard Pan, the state decided to do away with the first rule of medicine.  This is more than a little ironic, seeing as how Mr. Pan is also a medical doctor.  Unless one can afford to home school one’s children in California, they are, for all intents and purposes, forced to take a huge dose of vaccinations, of whatever type and dose the state – as directed by drug companies and the CDC – decide that they “need.”

Why is no adult discussion of vaccines allowed in the mainstream media?  What gives?

It is easy to spot pro-vaccine politicians and how they got that way.  All one needs do is look at their campaign contributions. Even in the insane age of Citizen’s United, one can still follow the money trail, most of the time.

Follow the Money Trail

It can be harder to follow the money for vaccine advocates working in academia.  Sometimes they  write such prolific trash supporting drug companies, it is almost impossible NOT to spot them.  When an academic like Dorit Reiss of UC Hastings College of Law and Kaiser Permanente, posts 1,000 (or so) blogs to attack parents of children injured by vaccines and promotes mass vaccination, it is not so difficult.  She repeats, ad nauseam, that thousands of vaccine safety studies have been done to prove vaccine safety and efficacy, and it simply is not true.  Who or what is paying Ms. Reiss to support industry and attack vaccine-injured children’s parents and other critical thinkers?  How does she possibly find the time if she has a real job?  In this case, one need look no further than her stated employers, and the money behind UC Hastings and Kaiser.

Why is no adult discussion of vaccines allowed in the mainstream media?  What gives?

Monsanto Money earns UW-Madison Seal of Approval

It is also instructive to learn just how industry captures some academic institutions in order to do its bidding.  The University of Wisconsin, for one example, fairly rolled over for Monsanto when the company “donated” a $10 million commercial biotech plant laboratory that helped develop genetically modified plants.  That “donation” has made UW-Madison “the hub of a new crop research center,” gushed the Wisconsin State Journal on Jan. 31, 2017.  Gee, I wonder if the UW will continue to support GMO foods as they have so dutifully in the past after receiving multi-milllon-dollar “gifts” from Monsanto.  Is the UW aware that hundreds of Roundup Lymphoma lawsuits are being filed against its great benefactor, Monsanto?  (Maybe all that dough will buy some helpful studies “proving” the safety of Roundup.)

The UW-Madison also got nicely behind Monsanto’s  awful bovine growth hormone (rBST) after Monsanto donated a couple million to the UW just as it also gifted the world with rBST.  Not to pick on the Badger state’s flagship school.  Most land-grand universities are hot for donations, and  will do almost anything to keep them coming.

Sometimes the payments for those supporting corporate profits at the expense of people are harder to spot, at least until one looks closer.

Professor Dorit Reiss of Hastings Law School in San Francisco seems to have gotten her start in the blogging business after Katie Couric had the temerity to question the safety of Merck’s Gardasil vaccine.  It seems several girls were dying after their Gardasil injections, or catching auto-immune diseases; so Ms. Couric investigated.  Ms. Reiss was then keen to demonstrate her loyalties to her state’s Draconian vaccination policy, and to her university and its Big Pharma backers.  She even had the gall to write in defense of the “advantages” of a school’s being captured by industry, or a regulatory agency’s working closely and “cooperatively” with industry.  (You can’t make this stuff up.)  The word “capture,” she wrote, has negative connotations, and therefore should not be used.  Put lipstick on a pig, she might have added, and it might look beautiful, at least to Ms. Reiss.

With Professor Reiss’ considerable help, Katie Couric was wildly attacked when she ran a nationally televised story covering Gardasil dangers.  Robert De Niro – the father of an autistic son whose Black mother says he was made that way by vaccination – was likewise savaged for questioning American children’s massive vaccination schedule.  Jim Carey (who said he was not anti vaccine) was also attacked, as was Jenny McCarthy, Rob Schneider, and anyone else who has had the temerity to question America’s increasingly heavy childhood vaccine schedule, and the forced vaccination of school children.

Why is no adult discussion of vaccines allowed in the mainstream media?  What gives?

Vaccine Comedy Dutifully Promotes Vaccination

Comedy Central’s John Oliver has devoted more and more of his time to savaging anyone who questions the “prevailing wisdom” of vaccination.  Mr. Oliver’s audience guffaws as dutifully as a laugh track as he pretends to have all the answers, to know that all vaccinations are safe and effective and necessary.  His dismissive views are oddly solidly backed by the likes of strange bedfellows, Republican stalwarts such as The Wall Street Journal and Forbes.   This is quite curious, considering that Mr. Oliver’s show is decidedly slanted to the liberal side of the aisle.  (One might be wise to pay special attention when the entire mainstream media is all behind something, or all uniformly against it.)

Why is no adult discussion about vaccines allowed in the mainstream media?  What gives?

The fact that President Donald Trump has questioned the prevailing wisdom of shooting as many vaccines into children as Merck and the CDC say they need is used to further marginalize vaccine skeptics.  The fact that Mr. Trump is (by many critical accounts from close observers) a sociopathic narcissist, is used by mandatory vaccine supporters as one more reason that ALL and ANY discussion of vaccination should not even be allowed.  What if Mr. Trump were right about something?  Is it possible?

Why is no adult discussion of vaccines allowed in the mainstream media?  What gives?

Fake Vaccine News, Fake Studies, Fake Advocates

Do those who so viciously attack “anti-vaxxers” really think or believe that every vaccine is safe and effective, and that every vaccine should be used any time Merck or the CDC say so?  What if they are wrong?  What if every vaccine is not safe and effective?  What if every vaccination batch needs a careful inventory of chemical components and a field trial?  What if they should all be monitored for safety and effectiveness?  What if that vaccine they want to put directly into your kid’s bloodstream, bypassing her immune system, is made in China, where the FDA is not allowed inside the plants to investigate?  What if the shingles vaccine has blinded several people and given them repeat cases of shingles?  Is that something you would like to know? What if the flu vaccine doesn’t work this year, or isn’t worth the risk?  What if more people died of the flu after taking the flu shot last year than unvaccinated people who got the flu?  Is that something you’d like to know? What if vaccine makers don’t lose sleep over safety issues because they know that the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act protects them from liability; so that they have very little incentive to make safe vaccines?  Why do vaccine makers or their shills – like Professor Dorit Reiss of Hastings Law School in San Francisco, or Comedy Central’s John Oliver, or vaccine-profiteer Paul Offit (aptly named) – think the 1986 Act was necessary if vaccine injuries don’t occur?

What gives? Why is no adult discussion of vaccines allowed in the mainstream media?

All one needs do is follow the money.

RELATED

Share

WebMD shills for Monsanto & Big Pharma

WebMD shills for Monsanto, Big Pharma, and other corporate giants.  Natural News has revealed how WebMD has never seen a Monsanto product or a Big Pharma drug or vaccination that it didn’t like.  It promotes them all, without question or critical comment.  Why?

It’s the Advertising Money, Stupid
WebMD takes most of its advertising money from Big Pharma corporations like Merck, maker of the dubious shingles vaccine, the dangerous MMR vaccine, and other troublesome vaccines that are far from as safe or as effective as advertised by Merck and WebMD.  The company known as WebMD is one that clearly knows which industry giants are paying its bills.  WebMD is, in point of fact, little more than a tireless promoter of not only Big Pharma drugs and ethically-challenged Monsanto, but any and all vaccination, regardless of real science (or lack thereof) or circumstances.

Related:  Five Most Dangerous Vaccines

Passive GMO Promotion
Corporate sponsorships taint WebMD’s recommendations and “passive” promotion techniques. WebMD advertisements are often designed to look more like editorials to disguise their real intent, fooling readers into thinking that the advertising they see is actually news of some sort.

Monsanto WebMD Partnership
Monsanto uses WebMD’s influence to serve its own agenda.  Monsanto produces several sponsored “advertorials” that can easily be mistaken for “real” content rather than marketing propaganda.  Monsanto also uses independent third parties to manipulate GMO content on WebMD’s web site. (Monsanto also colludes with the EPA to play down the dangers of Roundup and promote it.)

Web MD Internet’s Most Visited Health Site
WebMD is, unfortunately for the truth, the internet’s most visited health site.  Public perception is that it’s a trustworthy source of “independent and objective” health information.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  WebMD is a thinly-disguised corporate shill masquerading as a news site.  WebMD uses its influence to shamelessly promote corporate-backed health products and protocols.

WebMD’s Journalistic Subterfuge destroys Credibility
WebMD “Partnerships” destroy any credibility the site may have once had.  Partnerships and sponsorships infect WebMD’s recommendations across the board. “Passive” promotion techniques include advertisements designed to look like editorials.  This is journalistic subterfuge at its worst, and its most sophisticated.

Web MD Rigs Phony Test for Depression
The pharmaceutical drug industry’s capture of WebMD has been clear for a long while and is nearly complete.  In just one egregious example, Dr. Mercola has reported how WebMD’s free online depression test in 2010 was rigged to make any person responding feel like she needed professional help.  The only result a test respondent could receive was that she was at risk for major depression and should discuss her options with a doctor.

That phony “test” was sponsored by Cymbalta maker Eli Lilly.  The test’s intent was obvious – to make a person inquire about antidepressants, and hopefully start taking them, preferably forever.

This advertisement dressed up as a “consumer aid” to make people go from feeling normal to depressed caught the attention of Senator Charles Grassley.  He launched an investigation, but that announcement changed no laws and apparently no perceptions.  WebMD continues to hide advertising business as usual.  Consumer Beware!

Web MD Aids Monsanto
Monsanto is one of the latest multinational corporate giants to use WebMD for its own hidden agenda.  Nearly every WebMD article now includes a Monsanto-sponsored ad that boldly declares: “It’s time for a bigger discussion about food.”  This clever propaganda then links to Monsanto’s corporate take on soil, water, and honey bee-disappearance, with no other contributor’s point of view allowed.

Marketing Strategists Tout “Advertorial Sponsorships”
Marketing strategists say “advertorial sponsorships” are the best way to sell something today.  They are designed to fool consumers, so that they don’t realize they’re being sold something.

Back in the day, before deep-pocketed advertisers called the shots and completely ruled the publishing world, the line between editorial and advertising content was clear.  You knew whether you were reading an advertisement or an editorial.  Today, readers practically need degrees in journalism and science to know what they’re reading, who sponsored it, and why.

A business has to pay for a sponsorship/advertorial just like it would a regular ad.  In some cases, businesses pay significantly more than they would for a regular ad.  But corporations consider the expense of a sponsorship/advertorial ad well worth the cost.

As Dr. Mercola explains: “The venue where your sponsored advertorial is going (in this case, WebMD and its affiliates) has no input on the content – the advertiser has full control over the text of the ‘informative’ ad.  The advertiser can control how the information is presented on the page, as opposed to having to select a regular display ad format.”

The sponsored advertorial can be used in multiple publications.  Companies can reuse a sponsored advertorial as a stand-alone ad in other places.

Native Advertising’ further Blurs the Line Between Ads and Independent Content

Another form of this type of shrouded sales presentation is called “native advertising.” The key difference between a native ad and an advertorial is that a native ad fits more seamlessly into the Website which features it, making it even less noticeable as a sales pitch.

This sneaky ad is designed to make you think you’re reading a regular content article, when in fact it’s all marketing. In the case of WebMD, the advertorial/native ad line is so thin as to be non-existent. Many of WebMD’s disclaimers are barely noticeable, and rendered in a typeset which manipulates readers into skipping them entirely.

Dr. Mercola explains:  “This all amounts to massive collusion on the part of the industries partnering with WebMD to sell THEIR health goals and products without you realizing you’ve been sold something that may or may not be in your best interest at all.”

WebMD pushes Vaccination

When it comes to vaccination, WebMD publishes only those articles which make it seem as if vaccination is a tried and true science without enormous problems, which include lawsuits for dubious vaccines like Merck’s Zostavax.  Vaccination “science” is far from settled, but you wouldn’t know that if you read only WebMD’s narow take on the subject.  The same goes for Monsanto products, and Big Pharma drugs.

WebMD shills for Monsanto & Big Pharma

If you want to find out what is really going on in the world of GMO foods, Big Pharma drugs, and vaccination safety and efficacy, the best thing you could do is avoid WebMD.  You will find little truth there not colored by WebMD’s fealty to its corporate and government sponsors.  Selah!

RELATED

Share