Women not Warned Taxotere causes Permanent Hair Loss

Women in thealopecia-2 U.S. were not warned until 2016 that the chemotherapy drug Taxotere causes permanent hair loss. Women in Europe and Canada, however, were warned as early as 2005. This failure to warn is at the center of Taxotere Lawsuits filed in the United States. American women suffering from permanent hair loss after being Taxotered during chemotherapy treatments all claim in their lawsuits that they would not have consented to being administered the drug if they had known it raised the risk of permanent hair loss or alopecia.

Failure to Warn
Taxotere’s maker Sanofi-Aventis failed to warn American women in order to keep the profits from the drug flowing, according to Taxotere Lawsuit petitions filed against the French-based company. A whistleblower lawsuit brought by a company insider makes a similar claim, along with allegations that Sanofi-Aventis awarded doctors kickbacks to illegally incentivize use of the drug. Taxotere sales increased drastically during this alleged scam to withhold warnings from Americans, climbing from $424 million to $1.4 billion in four years. Consequently, Taxotere’s unnecessary toxicity was administered to thousands of patients when less toxic chemotherapy medications were readily available.

FDA Taxotere Warnings
The FDA did not requirehair-loss Sanofi-Aventis to add a warning about alopecia to Taxotere labeling until Dec. 2015, which means that most women wouldn’t have learned of the warning until well into 2016.  There is always some lag time between FDA pronouncements and their delivery to doctors and their patients. At that time, the agency wrote under “adverse reactions” that “Postmarketing Experience” showed “Cases of permanent alopecia have been reported.”  (emphasis ours)

That alopecia warning came much too late for thousands of American women who  now suffer from permanent baldness.

Other FDA Warnings on Taxotere

  • November 2014 – alcohol content could lead to intoxication
  • December 2013 – Eye Disorders: Cystoid macular edema (CME) has been reported in patients treated with TAXOTERE and other taxanes. For metabolism and nutrition disorders, cases of hyponatremia reported.
  • June 2013 – Respiratory: dyspnea, acute pulmonary edema, acute respiratory distress syndrome/pneumonitis, interstitial lung disease, interstitial pneumonia, respiratory failure, and pulmonary fibrosis have rarely been reported and may be associated with fatal outcome. Rare cases of radiation pneumonitis have been reported in patients receiving concomitant radiotherapy.
  • May 2010 – Warnings for Use in Children (see the FDA safety info.)

April 2010 Summary View includes Renal Failure
Adverse reactions in post-marketing experiences included Scleroderma-like changes usually preceded by peripheral lymphedema, along with renal failure, most often associated with concomitant nephrotoxic drugs

Taxotere in Drug Combinations Cautioned
FDA also concluded that concomitant use of Taxotere and drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 may increase exposure to docetaxel and should be avoided. In patients receiving treatment with Taxotere, close monitoring for toxicity and a Taxotere dose reduction could be considered if systemic administration of a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor cannot be avoided.

Women not Warned Taxotere causes Permanent Hair Loss

Sanofi-Aventis needs to be held accountable for misleading women (which we believe to be the case) into being injected with a drug that significantly raises the risk of permanent baldness. Approximately 10-15% of women who were administered Taxotere during chemotherapy reported zero hair growth for as long as ten years after stopping treatment.

Free Legal Consultation

Contact an experienced drug injury lawyer for a potential Taxotere Lawsuit if you or someone you love suffered permanent baldness after taking chemotherapy treatment.  We offer a no-obligation free legal consultation.

RELATED

Share

Washington State sues Monsanto

Washington is suing monsanto-logoMonsanto over PCB contamination in the state. Monsanto is accused of negligent handling of PCBs. Polychlorinated biphenyls are a banned and highly toxic group of chemicals that Monsanto made for decades. The biotech bully from Missouri has been sued by several cities over PCB contamination, but Washington is the first state to pursue litigation.

Related: Monsanto sued for Roundup Cancer 

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and Attorney General Bob Ferguson announced the lawsuit at a press conference December 10, 2016. It was filed in King County Superior Court in Seattle.

Washington seeks damages on several grounds. They include product liability for Monsanto’s Failure to Warn about PCB dangers; Negligence; Trespass for harming the state’s natural resources, including fish and wildlife.

Monsanto was the only manufacturer of the PCB compound that was used to insulate electronics from 1935 until 1977. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finally banned PCBs in 1979, because of PCBs’ link to birth defects and cancer in laboratory animals. PCBs are also known to trigger adverse skin and liver effects in humans. The toxic chemical also survives to poison everything it touches for many decades.

PCBs contaminate Washington State
“PCBs have been found in bays, rivers, streams, sediment, soil and air throughout Washington state,’ explained AG Bob Ferguson, “with more than 600 suspected or confirmed contamination sites from Puget Sound to the Wenatchee River, Lake Spokane to Commencement Bay.”

Mr. Ferguson said Washington has spent tens of millions of dollars on cleaning up PCB contamination, but the toxic pollutants have nevertheless caused grievous harm to protected salmon and orcas. Washington consequently seeks hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars from Monsanto.

Monsanto hid PCB Dangers – Petition
Similar to others who have sued Monsanto for PCB contamination, Mr. Ferguson further claimed that “Monsanto produced PCBs for decades while hiding what they knew about the toxic chemicals’ harm to human health and the environment.”

Mr. Ferguson said Monsanto’s own documents show the company knew about the dangers of PCBs way back in 1937. One document stated that tests on animals revealed “systemic toxic effects” from prolonged exposure from inhaling PCB fumes or ingesting PCBs.

Monsanto Profits Trump Safety
As the Associated Press reported, in 1969, a Monsanto committee on PCBs declared:

“There is too much customer/market need and selfishly too much Monsanto profit to go out … There is little probability that any action that can be taken will prevent the growing incrimination of specific polychlorinated biphenyls … as nearly global environmental contaminants leading to contamination of human food (particularly fish), the killing of some marine species (shrimp), and the possible extinction of several species of fish eating birds.”

Monsanto lied to New Jersey
Despite sitting on this damning information, Monsanto told the public not to worry. Also in 1969, a Monsanto letter to New Jersey’s Department of Conservation stated: “Based on available data, manufacturing and use experience, we do not believe PCBs to be seriously toxic.”

Cities sue Monsanto
Monsanto also faces similar PCB contamination lawsuits from at least eight other West Coast cities, which include Seattle and Spokane in Washington state; Portland in Oregon; Berkeley, San Diego, San Jose, Oakland, Long Beach in California.

Monsanto spokesman Scott S. Partridge said in a statement to the Associated Press that the “[Washington] case is experimental because it seeks to target a product manufacturer for selling a lawful and useful chemical four to eight decades ago that was applied by the U.S. government, Washington State, local cities, and industries into many products to make them safer.”

Monsanto has usually won in lawsuits filed against it over human illness related to PCBs. But in May 2016, a St. Louis jury awarded $46.5 million in damages to three plaintiffs who claimed PCB exposure caused their non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Washington sues Monsanto

That Washington lawsuit also accuses Monsanto of continuing to sell PCBs even after the company knew the dangers and falsely assured people they were safe.

Related

 

Share

Drug Bill makes People Pigs

People will be FDA Logoguinea pigs for new drugs if a new congressional bill passes. Oh sure, we’ve all been guinea pigs through the years. Some 100,000 people are killed annually (and routinely) by legal Big Pharma drugs. Thousands of others are injured or killed by experimental vaccines (even if they aren’t labeled that way). But at least we previously enjoyed the semblance of decency, informed consent, common sense, that sort of thing. By contrast, this new bill would grant pharmaceutical companies the right to test their drugs on us AFTER those drugs have been “FDA-approved.”

Progressive Approval?  WTF?
In lockstep with the absurd 21St Century Cures Bill, Donald Trump’s latest consideration to head the FDA is on the same page as the Congress. He calls this new plan “progressive approval.”  Its passing would be a dream for pharmaceutical companies, saving them billions of dollars in expensive testing. The rest of us will get to eat cake, but we’ll have to pay for it first.

Promote Corporate profits at Citizens’ Expense
Mr. Trump is considering a Silicon Valley investor friend of billionaire Peter Thiel to head the Food and Drug Administration. Jim O’Neill, the Thiel associate, hasn’t been officially chosen, so Mr. Trump could still go in another direction. However, Mr. O’Neill’s thinking falls conveniently right in line with the 21st Century Cures bill that Congress is busy trying to ram down our throats. The message at the moment from Mr. Trump and the Congress appears consistent: Help corporations thrive; make citizens pay the price.

No Medical Experience
FDA heads for the past five decades have all been doctors or prominent scientific researchers. Mr. O’Neill is neither. He has no relevant experience in the food or drug industry. Mr. O’Neill is a managing director at Peter Thiel’s Mithril Capital Management. He did formerly serve in government for the George W. Bush administration, as principal associate deputy secretary at the Department of Health and Human Services.

FDA Reformer?
Mr. O’Neill saidwarning-fda-drug in a 2014 speech that he supported reforming FDA approval rules so that drugs could hit the market after they’ve been proven safe, but without any proof that they worked (emphasis ours). He calls it “progressive approval.”

“We should reform FDA so there is approving drugs after their sponsors have demonstrated safety – and let people start using them, at their own risk, but not much risk of safety,” Mr. O’Neill said in a speech at an August 2014 conference called Rejuvenation Biotechnology. “Let’s prove efficacy after they’ve been legalized.”

Pay for your own Experiment
That position begs the painfully obvious question: Why would someone want to pay for and try a drug which has no record of efficacy?  “Do you want to be the first wave of guinnea pigs to try this drug? Don’t worry. We’ve proven it’s ‘safe,’ even if we don’t know whether it works. What have you got to lose? Trust us.”

Draining the Swamp?
Mr. O’Neill made a fortune cashing in on the housing bubble swindle. He first served as a managing director at Clarium Capital, Thiel’s hedge fund that made a mint by predicting the housing bubble and subsequent crumbling. Since 2012 he has worked as managing director at Mithril Capital, Thiel’s late-stage venture firm.

Drug Bill makes People Pigs

It’s another Trump pick that doesn’t seem to be draining the swamp so much as figuring out new ways to fleece Americans and deepen the swamp. Promoting public risk for private profit is what created the swamp, and this is more of the same, only worse.  Doesn’t Mr. Trump think he should at least show some pretense of pretending to care about the working class Americans he promised to help? And can our congress stoop any lower than the so-called 21st Century Cures Bill?

Related

Share

Vaccine Injuries hidden by Media

Lies of omission vaccine-epidemiccan be just as damaging as blatant stated lies. You know, like those mainstream media outlets – CNN, The New York Times, Washington Post, etc. – gave us about Iraq harboring weapons of mass destruction (Read: distraction). Vaccine injuries are hidden by mainstream media deeper than those non-existent WMDs. The media bury vaccine injuries by omitting them entirely from the “news.” (In similar fashion,  mainstream newsfakers lied about Bernie Sanders by blacking him out, as proven by a Harvard study.)

Mainstream Media Vaccine Injury Lies

The only thing you ever hear from mainstream media is the endless lie that no evidence links vaccines and autism. For the thousands of kids and their parents suffering autism after vaccination, it is an unconscionable, hateful lie.  The country’s so-called “vaccine court” has paid out more than $3 billion to vaccine injured children and their families. The court paid a multi-million dollar award in the Hannah Poling case, though likely only because her father was a neurosurgeon whose personal knowledge couldn’t be denied, unlike 80% of the vaccine-injured kids and their families who are turned back by the same secret court. Many people die from the flu shot every year. Many have died from Merck’s nightmarish Gardasil vaccine.  Many have died following the so-called Zostavax, a shingles vaccine. More than two dozen studies suggest a link between vaccines and autism.

Vaccine Safety Study pulled from Web

One of the latest vaccine safety studies was a peer-reviewed scientific study that showed a link between vaccines and health. The study examined vaccinated vs. unvaccinated kids, which no study had done in this manner before. The study showed vaccinated kids three times more likely than unvaccinated ones to be diagnosed with autism and other neurological disorders and health problems. This study, however, was pulled from the internet after being heavily criticized by shills and trolls for the $50 billion vaccine industry.

666 Children
The results vaccineworkedof this first-ever study to compare the health of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated kids was accepted November 2, 2016, then published online in Frontiers in Public Health. The study compared kids’ health by surveying 412 mothers of 6-12 year olds. Nearly 40 percent of the total of 666 children had never been vaccinated, a control group adequate to provide a comparison against children who had been vaccinated.

No Control Group?
For years Big Pharma and its CDC enablers and revolving door opportunists like Julie Gerberding have argued that establishing a control group for vaccination is unethical, under the bloody assumption (unbacked by any evidence whatsoever) that vaccines work as their makers say they do, and that they cause no harm to the vaccinated that is not ‘balanced’ by the harm which failing to vaccinate the masses would cause. It’s the funky logic of a Vaccine Lottery which sacrifices some children for the good of all (in the parallel universe of Big Pharma and the CDC where people are not ends in themselves), at least in theory, if the bastards who support the larger agenda for their own enormous profits were even halfway honest with us at all, given the FACT that so many children and adults are injured and/or killed by vaccination.

(Related: See the movie Big Pharma and the CDC don’t want you to see: Vaxxed.)

Like a warplane that takes more flak as it threatens its target, the latest study published just this year took so much criticism from lobbyists and mainstream media hacks that it was then unpublished by the journal. One can only ask why. The answer is easy. If the study is sound, it represents earth-shattering evidence that suggests the entire vaccine paradigm and program is fundamentally flawed. But that couldn’t be the case, could it?

The study abstract stated:

“A total of 415vaccine-epidemic mothers provided data on 666 children, of which 261 (39%) were unvaccinated. Vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDDs (defined as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and/or a learning disability).”

The study further concluded:

“In this study based on mothers’ reports, the vaccinated had a higher rate of allergies and NDD than the unvaccinated. Vaccination, but not pre-term birth, remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors. However, pre-term birth combined with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.”

The Authors

The authors were certainly not heavyweights in the field, which is mostly controlled by experts paid by Big Pharma, people like Paul Offit, who has made millions from creating at least one “vaccination” himself, and promoting the whole CDC vaccination program from bully pulpits endlessly provided by the MSM.

The paper was peer-reviewed by Linda Mullin Elkins, a chiropractor at Life University, and Kelly Hsieh from the University of Illinois at Chicago. It was edited by Amit Agrawal at Gandhi Medical College in India.

The initialvaccinate-this backlash came from public comments which claimed the study was poorly designed, (It’s true that any study can be designed to get the results one wants. Right, CDC? Right, Big Pharma?). Criticisms also claimed that relying on mothers for self reporting was faulty. The study was further criticized as “antivaccinationist” and “bogus.” The usual“anti-vaxxer” name calling predominated, as it always does when a study threatens the CDC’s pro-vaccination program, Big Pharma profits, and MSM drug company advertising money. Not for a nickel does the mainstream media parrot the junk science backing forced vaccination.

Dr. Graham Downing, a Neuro-musculoskeletal and Functional Medicine consultant in the UK, has found that vaccinating pregnant women increases inflammation in their bodies and also increases the risk of releasing inflammatory markers in their fetuses/infants. Such releases include phenotypes, which can alter an individual. Dr. Russell Blaylock has also explained at length why there can be nothing more insane than vaccinating a pregnant woman.

Vaccine Injuries hidden by Media

Investmentwatchblog.com reports that this first study into vaccinated versus unvaccinated children has not only been unpublished by Frontiers In Public Health, but also taken down from the internet. To aid in the free flow of information which used to be a hallmark of our democracy, we have cached the study here:

screen-shot-2016-11-28-at-09-36-00

Related

Share

Glyphosate Poisons Cereal

The Nov. 14 release Roundupof ‘Glyphosate: Unsafe On Any Plate’ reveals alarming levels of Monsanto’s glyphosate in popular American foods. The story puts Monsanto shills into full attack mode. The main ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup poison, glyphosate was shown to be everywhere, contaminating all kinds of foods. The problem is, Monsanto mainstream presstitute minions have  had to admit the reports were true. Glyphosate  contaminates some of the world’s most popular foods, including many breakfast cereals.

See the Report: Glyphosate: Unsafe on Any Plate

Cheerios, Corn Flakes, Raison Bran Glyyphosated
The testing report published by Food Democracy Now! and The Detox Project revealed alarming levels (5 to 1125 ppb) of glyphosate in General Mills’ Cheerios, Honey Nut Cheerios; Kellogg’s Corn Flakes, Raisin Bran, Frosted Flakes; PepsiCo’s Doritos Cool Ranch, Ritz Crackers; Stacy’s Simply Naked Pita Chips; and many other popular food products. All were found to have glyphosate levels that present significant risks, according to the latest independent peer-reviewed science on glyphosate, the main active ingredient in Monsanto’s toxic Roundup.

Related: Roundup more Toxic than Glyphosate

Criticism of Testing Methods Fails
The publishing of ‘Glyphosate: Unsafe On Any Plate’ was attacked by some of Monsanto’s main supporters, whose financial ties to Monsanto need to be properly parsed, either personally or through “grants” or other payments made to the universities that employ them. Dr. Kevin Folta (University of Florida) and Dr. Michelle McGuire (Washington State University) are two such individuals.

Doctors Folta and McGuire fired Monsanto salvos at the report on November 14, via  Twitter. They both criticized the testing methods used, even before they understood what those were. However, after holding an e-mail conversation with the FDA-registered Anresco Laboratories, Dr. Folta withdrew his criticism, which he had already fed to several pro GMO journalists across the U.S.

On November 24, according to SustainablePulse.com, Dr. Folta stated: “I was contacted by the laboratory that did the analysis for them and I am comfortable that they did the detection 100% correctly.  No question.”

Glyphosate Poisons Cereal

The statement of Anresco Laboratories’ expert statement regarding their new era of glyphosate testing can be found here:  Anresco Lab Statement

Misinformation regarding  safety of glyphosate

After failing in their first line of attack, Monsanto propagandists moved on to other possible ways to discredit the report.

They first tried the old  ‘dose makes the poison’ argument.  This fallacy has always been used by logically lazy and/or desperate industry-funded scientists. Dr. Folta is one of those industry scientists who still ‘believe’ low doses of chemicals are not dangerous despite mainstream scientific evidence that proves many chemicals can wreak havoc on hormones at extremely low levels (e.g. 0.1 to 3000 ppb).

Chemical industry funded science still suggests that dose and danger levels coincide; however modern independent science has discovered many toxic chemicals have as much or more of an influence on our health at low doses, especially when they are mixed, as is the chemical cocktail of Roundup.

A study from March 2015 noted the health costs to the European Union of hormone hacking chemicals is over $ 150 Billion yearly.  The study stated that lower IQ, adult obesity, and 5% or more of autism cases are linked with exposure to endocrine disruptors.

Glyphosate a Hormone Hacker

Glyphosate is likely to be one of these hormone hacking chemicals according to independent science. See the evidence here.

Peer Review Criticism Absurd

Dr. Folta and colleagues have now taken to stating that they cannot trust the results because they are not peer-reviewed, even though they are all clearly aware of the difference between University studies and commercial laboratory reports.

This is an absurd attack. Minus any peer reviews whatsoever, millions of food samples in the U.S. are tested yearly and reported by FDA-registered labs, such as Anresco Laboratories, which has more than 70 years of testing experience.

Monsanto and its global poisoning business will be defended just as long as junk science researchers are rewarded by Ag-business giants like Monsanto.

Related

 

Share

Healthcare Workers Fight Forced Shots

Healthcare Mercury Safetyworkers are fighting back against the mainstream media push to promote their Big Pharma advertisers’ amazing vaccine profits. We’re again in flu season, which means we are going to hear the usual growing chorus of reasons why we all need a flu shot.

What MSM will not tell us

We will not hear about how last year’s flu shot was virtually worthless for anyone over 60, or how the shot works at best half the time for others. We will not hear about the horrors of mercury in the flu shot, or how flu shot batches consist of a guess as to how the influenza virus has mutated and how that guess, at best, stems from vague and uncertain “science.”

We won’t hear from the MSM that the flu shot accounts for more deaths than any other vaccine, at least as reported in the VAERS database, which is estimated to publish only 1-10% of the actual total of adverse vaccine events. We won’t hear that most Americans killed or injured by vaccines have virtually no chance to be compensated for their injuries, save for a visit to the arcane “vaccine court”, which denies some 80% of the vaccine injury claims made to it. We won’t hear any mention at all of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reports (VAERS) database which proves just how dangerous, even fatal, a “simple” flu shot can be. We certainly won’t be given links to the VAERS site by the newsfakers at the Washington Post, or the New York Times, or any other MSM “news” outlet, which all now seem to be in the process of warning us about “real fake news” elsewhere.

“Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. . . The Constitution was made to guard against the dangers of good intentions.”  – Daniel Webster

$50 Billion Industry insulated from Liability

Vaccines bring in more than $50 billion annually for vaccine makers like Merck – maker of the arguably fraudulent MMR vaccine (the subject of a civil lawsuit by former Merck scientists), the veritably worthless Shingles vaccine, and the nightmarish HPV vaccine, among others. And because vaccine makers are vaccinated against liability (by our loyal government) for any harms they cause, Big Pharma is creating more and more vaccines every year. Who would not like a piece of this business model? You get government to force people to take whatever “shots” you choose to give them, and then you get complete immunity when those shots sicken or kill the hapless fools.

In the MSM, you will only read how millions of Americans will catch the flu in a given season, and that perhaps 200,000 will be hospitalized, according to the Big Pharma-corrupted Centers for Disease Control, which is financed by your tax dollars.

You will not read about how many people get the flu from the flu shot. You will read that that idea is a myth. You will not be directed to look at the 2013 story of Piers Morgan given a flu shot by Dr. Oz on the latter’s television show, as the pleasant doctor told the hapless Morgan that he could not get the flu from the shot. You will not be given a link to the Youtube video which demonstrates how Oz proves the converse is true – that the myth was all his and the MSM’s, that the flu shot CAN and does give some (at least Piers Morgan, to be sure) the flu.

CDC shills for Big Pharma Vaccines

The CDC CDC Fictionsays a few thousand to perhaps tens of thousands of Americans get the flu each year and die from it. The CDC does not keep records, or at least does not tell you, how many of those people got the flu after getting the flu shot. The CDC does like to say that the elderly, infants and the immunocompromised are at higher risk than others.

Citing those statistics, which it would be very interesting to see verified somewhere, if we only knew where, the CDC in 1981 recommended all health care workers be vaccinated annually. In 2005, a Seattle hospital became the first to remove the right of informed consent from its staff. It required that all of its workers take vaccination or be fired. In 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services called for 90 percent of healthcare workers take vaccination by the end of the decade.

Healthcare Workers Fight Forced Shots
As hundreds more hospitals move toward forced vaccination for flu and God knows what else (Big Pharma decides that, then lobbies in D.C. to pass laws that help its business model), more human beings are claiming a religious exemption. Like others who have relied on religious objections because they are treated like children by this government and cannot simply stand on their informed consent rights guaranteed by the constitution, some hospital workers are turning to Title VII protections to avoid forced vaccination.

EEOC Lawsuits opposing Forced Vaccination
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has seen a spike in complaints from people who say they were fired for refusing a flu vaccine. The EEOC has filed several lawsuits for them, in a fight that is only just beginning.

Vaccine Efficacy & Informed Consent

Let’s not let this discussion degrade into a religious rights affair. This is about human rights. It is about the U.S. constitution’s guaranteed right of informed consent. Nazis were put to death at Nuremberg (those that weren’t smuggled into the USA or elsewhere to work for CIA black projects) for prisoner experiments which violated human beings’ rights of informed consent.

Vaccination Experiment Continues

Vaccination of every kind is an unproven experiment for anyone who has time to look into the matter. Ask those who have been blinded by the shingles vaccine, or who have contracted shingles AFTER taking the vaccine. Ask those who have seen a loved one die of the flu after taking the flu vaccine. Ask those who have seen a loved one die after taking the HPV vaccine. Are those people all expendable for the vaccine lottery? The only winners in forced vaccination are the vaccine makers and the mainstream media raking in billions in advertising monies for these ongoing human experiments.

Related

 

Share

Court kills Hawaii GMO Pesticide Ban

The Ninth GMO collageCircuit Court on Nov. 18, 2016 ruled that citizens of a given county have no inalienable right to reject so-called herbicides and toxic, genetically modified crops. The court’s ruling also kept the door open for continued secret crop spraying experiments by Monsanto and other chemical companies on the island of Maui.

Related: Glyphosate Cancer Link

Exposed local residents are the unwilling subjects of at least some of those secret experiments. The court’s ruling will help keep them in the dark about what is being sprayed on them, and for what purpose. (Imagining these pesticides are not being sprayed on us all is to imagine a no-peeing section in a swimming pool.)

Realat: Monsanto moving to Crush Maui

The court rejected regulations in three Hawaii counties which had voted to keep Monsanto’s cancerous glyphosate from being sprayed at Monsanto’s leisure on the Hawaiian island paradise. The court agreed with Monsanto and other pesticide companies and industry groups that Hawaii’s local rules are preempted by state and federal laws.  Controlled by Monsanto and other chemical company money, those who run Hawaii’s state government welcome Monsanto with open arms.

Right to Self Determination Rejected

The appeals court – which made five rulings in separate appeals over the regulations in Kauai County, Maui County and Hawaii County – found federal and state regulatory schemes that regulate harmful plants and pesticides don’t allow counties to make their own rules. Forget about the right to self determination, forget the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The rights of individuals to keep their food, lands, themselves, their pets and livestock from being poisoned was denied on this court’s watch.

Court kills Hawaii GMO Pesticide Regulations
In the case, Millions against MonsantoAlika Atay et al. v. County of Maui et al., the Ninth Circuit closed the door on an appeal from citizens groups, despite the fact that a Maui ordinance had banned genetically modified crops and the use of Monsanto’s toxic glyphosate.

The judges ignored arguments made by the Shaka Movement and other groups that they had banned Monsanto and GMOs. The judges ruled that such a ban was preempted by the U.S. Plant Protection Act, to the extent that it banned crops already regulated by the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service as “plant pests.” Judges, unlike people, are able to bend the law anyway they prefer. These judges also apparently ignored the fact that Monsanto made a secret arrangement with a prior judge in the case to keep secret its arguments as to why the company should be able to force its poisons onto people who voted against being exposed to them.

The Maui citizens’ groups had argued that the local law wasn’t preempted because it meant to prevent harms associated with transgenic contamination and pesticides. These are not “plant pest harms” under the PPA.

The judges found that what matters under the PPA’s preemption clause is whether a local law seeks to control, wipe out or prevent the dissemination of plants regulated by APHIS.

The judges wrote: “The fact that APHIS regulates such plants for reasons other than second-order concerns that motivated the local law, such as concern with transgenic contamination, is irrelevant as far as the express preemption clause is concerned.”

Rape of Hawaii Continues

If you can’t Agent-Orange-Spraying-on-your-producefollow that logistical legalese it is with good reason; this is Sophist reasoning at its finest. These laws were put in place to be bent by such judges to remove people’s rights of self determination. The whole history of the islands is a horrendous nightmare of rape and central control used to wipe out or at least neutralize  indigenous peoples.

Law 360 reports that, “For genetically engineered crops that had been deregulated by the APHIS, the panel held Hawaii’s comprehensive state statutory scheme for the regulation of potentially harmful plants preempted any further regulation by the county.”

Similar reasoning carried over to Hawaii County’s ban, the appeals court wrote in a memoradum opinion in Hawaii Papaya Industry Assn. et al v. County of Hawaii. that court also rejected that county’s ban on Monsanto and GMOs.

In Syngenta Seeds Inc. et al. v. County of Kauai et al., the appeals court issued another memorandum opinion shutting down provisions in Kauai’s Ordinance 960 that regulated GMO crops, using the same reasoning as Atay.

Kauai’s Ordinance 960 had also imposed regulations on commercial farm operations that utilized restricted-use pesticides. The Ninth Circuit, in a separate published opinion in the case, also wiped out that argument, finding the state’s pesticide laws also preempted self determination.

The judges wrote: “In sum, we monsanto-signfind that the Hawaii Pesticides Law comprehensively regulates pesticides and creates a clear inference of legislative intent to preempt local regulations of pesticides.”

Chemical companies sue Maui County

A coalition of chemical companies — which included Syngenta Seeds Inc., Syngenta Hawaii LLC, Pioneer Hi–Bred International Inc., Dow AgroSciences and BASF Plant Science LP — had sued Maui county in 2014 over the ordinance.

U.S. District Judge J. Barry M. Kurren agreed with their claim that the county had no authority to enact the ordinance because pesticide use was already covered by Hawaii state law.

The appeals court agreed. It said in its ruling last week that a local law is preempted under Hawaii law if it covers the same subject matter covered within a “comprehensive state statutory scheme” that shows an intent to be “exclusive and uniform” throughout the state.

The panel also upheld the lower court’s decision not to ask the Hawaii Supreme Court to offer its opinion on the issue of “implied preemption,” finding the state’s test “rather well-defined.”

Attorney Paul Achitoff of Earthjustice represented the Center for Food Safety and other environmental groups who intervened in the Syngenta case. He said the court interpreted Hawaiian law wrong and that the county rules should have been allowed to stand.

Mr. Achitoff said that despite striking down the specific ordinances because of Hawaii’s laws, the Ninth Circuit was generally supportive of the ability of states to pass their own regulations on genetically engineered crops and pesticides.

“It makes it clear that Hawaii’s Legislature, if it chooses, can solve these problems,” he said. “So we’ll continue working in that direction.”

A Fight for us All

God bless you, Mr. Achitoff, and the poisoned peoples of Maui. You are fighting for all of us born with the God-given right to refuse to be poisoned in an ongoing experiment that violates rules established at Nuremburg. We never consented to becoming subjects in Monsanto’s experiment in mass poisoning.

Related

Share

Talc Powder Mesothelioma Verdict $18 Million

A California man received a talc red metal talcpowder mesothelioma verdict of $18.06 million  last month.  A jury in Los Angeles gave the award to the former aide of ex-Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley. After being exposed for decades to asbestos in talcum powder, the man was diagnosed with aggressive cancer last year. The latency period for mesothelioma can be 30-40 years.

Following a six-week trial, a jury of 12 people delivered the verdict against talc supplier Whittaker Clark & Daniels on Oct. 19, 2016. The jury found the company 30 percent at fault for the man’s mesothelioma cancer.

Confidential Settlement
Superior Court Judge Charles Palmer dismissed the jury after the plaintiff and the talc maker reached a confidential settlement after the verdict, but before the case’s punitive damages phase, which would also have been in the hands of the jury.

Talc Powder contained Asbestos

The plaintiff, Philip Depoian, 68, of West Hills, California, said he was diagnosed with mesothelioma in May 2015. He blamed his meso diagnosis on his exposure to asbestos over several decades. His exposure began in 1948, he testified, when he visited his father’s barber shop for haircuts in Pasadena, Calif.

Mr. Depoian worked as Mayor Bradley’s assistant for 20 years. He is also a retired political operative, a veteran of several campaigns.  With his cancer at the advanced stage, he has undergone 30 rounds of chemotherapy so far. He is also taking part in a clinical trial at the National Cancer Institute in Maryland.

Multiple Talc Exposures

Mr. Depoian filed his personal injury lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court in January, 2016. His legal petition claimed he was exposed to asbestos or products that contained asbestos from about 1948 to 1993. Mr. Depoian said he used several products containing talc, including Old Spice, Clubman, Kings Men, Mennen Shave Talc.

Talc in Cosmetics, Foods, Gums, Tablets
Talc is a hydrous magnesium silicate that is part of many cosmetics, foods, gums, and tablets. According to the FDA, asbestos can be found close to talc during the mineral’s mining process.

FDA: Talc Suppliers Declined to Provide Samples
In 2009-10, FDA conducted a survey of four talc suppliers and analysis of various products including eye shadow, blush, foundation, face powder, and body powder. The agency found no asbestos contamination in those products, but it also acknowledged product samples were limited, and that five of the nine suppliers it contacted declined to provide any samples. A Statement on the FDA’s web site reads:

“For these reasons, while FDA finds these results informative, they do not prove that most or all talc or talc-containing cosmetic products currently marketed in the United States are likely to be free of asbestos contamination. As always, when potential public health concerns are raised, we will continue to monitor for new information and take appropriate actions to protect the public health.”

Asbestos fibers can still be found in plenty of products on store shelves. No adequate testing methodology has been designed which can assure the public talcum powders do not contain asbestos.

Talc Powder Mesothelioma Verdict $18 Million

The jury deliberated for one day before arriving at its verdict. The jury found that Whittaker, Clark & Daniels marketed its talc as asbestos free without conducting proper testing.

Clubman Talc maker American International Industries was found 10 percent at fault, Colgate-Palmolive as successor to Men Shave Talc 10 percent at fault, Cyprus Amax Minerals 40 percent at fault, and Old Spice talc maker Shutlon 10 percent at fault.

According to a news release, the parties reached a confidential settlement Oct. 26, after the verdict but before the trial’s punitive damages phase.

Legal Commentary

Attorney David Matthews, whose law firm handles talc cancer cases nationwide, said the company must have anticipated a very large punitive damage award in order to settle the case.

Defendants

Whittaker Clark & Daniels was the only named defendant by the trial’s end.

Mr. Depoian’s original complaint listed defendants as American International Industries; Brenntag North America; Brenntag Specialties; Calaveras Asbestos; Colgate-Palmolive; Cyprus Amax Minerals; Dana Classic Fragrances; Georgia-Pacific; Helen of Troy; Kaiser Gypsum; Metropolitan Life Insurance; Pfizer; Procter & Gamble; Shulton; Soco-West; Unilever United States; Union Carbide; Whittaker Clark & Daniels; Wyeth Holdings.

Related

Share

Clinton Backs Monsanto, GMOs

Many people who Hillary Monsanto Moneysupported Hillary Clinton for President apparently didn’t know or perhaps don’t care that she is a longtime supporter of Monsanto and GMO foods. (Bernie Sanders, by contrast, is most decidedly NOT a GMO Yes man.) Monsanto’s bid to monopolize the world’s seed supply is part and parcel of the globalists’ attempt to eliminate all viable borders between nation states. Proponents of Monsanto’s carcinogenic glyphosate know no borders, recognize no fence lines, abide no dissent.

Monsanto, which is in process of being bought by the war criminal Bayer Company (if corporations are people, as the US Supreme Court ruled, why can’t they be prosecuted as people?), collects politicians around the world with various campaign donations, personal favors, and a long list of tit for tat arrangements under the table.

Mrs. Clinton – Monsanto Lawyer

In Mrs. Clinton’s case, her Monsanto connections began above board when she represented the company as a lawyer with the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock. She has since, for good reason, been called the queen of Monsanto, taking some $335,000 for just one speaking fee from a Monsanto front group.

Monsanto is tight with both the Democrat and Republican parties. When the US illegally invaded Iraq in 2004, part of the conditions of our “helping” that country rebuild was that Iraqi farmers plant only Monsanto’s GMO seeds, the kind with the pesticide engineered inside (so that you eat it), the kind the company prosecutes farmers for collecting and trying to replant.

U.S. Government forces Monsanto on Iraqis

Yes, the US Government and Monsanto dictated that in Mesopotamia, where man first tilled the soil thousands of years ago – and so presumably knew something about farming – Iraqi farmers could henceforth sew only GMO seed. They could use only Monsanto or other chemical and biotech business’ poison products; that was the condition for our  “help” in rebuilding the mess we made of their country. By any measure, this forcing them to farm only Monsanto crap is a war crime. The results have been predictably terrible in Iraq’s arid soil. Studies have long shown that GMO seeds need more water, not less, and more pesticide, not less, unlike the promotional brochures’ promise. For many decades, Iraq produced the finest produce in the Middle East, until Monsanto and its toxic glyphosate was forced on the decimated and shell-shocked population.

New World Order for Monsanto

For the Obama Liaruninitiated, this is how the New World Order works. It uses the US government to wage war, murder a country’s people and leaders, all in order to take their resources (oil, opium, shipping port access, what else you got?) and also make the country safe for Monsanto, Coca-Cola, United Fruit, and other international mega-business concerns. (Required Reading: General Smedley Butler’s War is a Racket).

The NWO uses our military to secure big paydays for military contractors, Monsanto, Big Pharma (it’s the liability-free vaccines, stupid), Wal-Mart and other giant business monsters. The NWO uses our military to do it all in the name of Democracy. It’s a very transparent, duplicitous ploy, and it shows no signs of slowing.

The dark punch line is that not one single country that our CIA and military have been used to destabilize has made a success of any sort of Democracy, which has always been the ruse we operate under. Not Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, The Phillippines, Grenada, Haiti, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Lybia, not one single country which we have invaded to “help” has been improved by our “help.”

Murder Inc. – coup d’états r us

In fact, the opposite is true. Since 1953 when CIA pulled its first major coup, orchestrating the overthrow of Iran’s leader and elected government, everything the CIA and US government has meddled in has turned out for the worse for that country. The 1953 Iranian coup d’état was the CIA-orchestrated overthrow of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. He had committed the unpardonable sin of imagining his oil should be owned by his people. He sought to audit the documents of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), a British corporation (now part of BP, which destroyed our Gulf Of Mexico forever, adding Corexit to finish the poisoning job) and to limit the company’s control over Iranian petroleum reserves. When AIOC refused to co-operate with the Iranian government, the parliament (Majlis) voted to nationalize Iran’s oil industry and expel foreign corporate representatives. That triggered a CIA-sponsored bloodbath.

U.S. Oil CIA Ties

Britain instigated a worldwide boycott of Iranian oil, while using Iranian agents to undermine Mosaddegh’s government. In August 2013, 60 years after, CIA finally admitted it was in charge of both the planning and the execution of the Iranian coup, including the bribing of Iranian politicians, security and army high-ranking officials, as well as pro-coup propaganda. The agency justifies it on its web site “as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.”

The CIA and US Government pulled a similar trick in 1954, this time with a democratically elected leader. The American version of Murder Inc. (Eh, Michael Hastings?) destroyed the government of Guatemala and orchestrated the murder (falsely ruled a suicide) of its leader, Jacobo Arbenz. The CIA even admits on its own web site that their role in this horror “came to be widely seen as shameful. (The) governments that followed the 1954 coup in the subsequent five decades were far more repressive than Arbenz’s elective government. Even intelligence scholar Christopher Andrew, an Eisenhower admirer, describes the Guatemala affair as a “’disreputable moment.’”

A Disreputable Moment
Hillary Clinton’s Monsanto association has been more than a disreputable moment, but hopefully her pro Monsanto stance takes some of the sting out of her defeat for democrats. If you care about our food supply, care about a government-connected company dictating what kind of food a nation can or cannot grow, her defeat is hopefully some sort of defeat for Monsanto. Maybe Trump will do something about the unconscionable way that FDA was steamrolled by Michael Taylor and other Monsanto-FDA turn-style turncoats who used their positions with FDA and their executive jobs with Monsanto to blur the lines between the fox and the henhouse.

Related

 

Share

Vaccine Agenda pushed by CBS

Nov. 7, 2016 —EyeLies The vaccine agenda is pushed by CBS. 60 Minutes viewers were treated last night to pro-vaccine propaganda from the old network. 60 Minutes ran a segment promoting the morally-challenged CDC and trumpeting the creation of a Zika vaccine to cure the wildly overhyped threat of Zika. CBS and the CDC also shill for Merck’s nightmare HPV vaccine Gardasil as well as the highly dubious shingles vaccine.

CBS Credibility Problems

CBS has had credibility problems at least since newsman Dan Rather lied to the entire nation. (CBS has since lied so much it’s hard to keep up.) On Nov. 25, 1963, Mr. Rather proclaimed to the whole country that he had seen the Abraham Zapruder film. He claimed the film demonstrated that John F. Kennedy’s head moved violently forward as he was shot from behind in Dallas.  Six years later, when the whole country had viewed the same film, everyone saw that Mr. Rather and CBS had lied. LIED. We all saw Mr. Kennedy’s head move violently backward with the final fatal shot.

Related: Birth Defects not caused by Zika

Film proves CBS Lies

That violent backward movement definitively proved that our President was shot at least once from the front, which in turn showed that there had been a probable conspiracy involving more than one shooter. The House Select Committee on Assassinations thus ruled that “John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.” (HSCA-1979)  CBS was thus outed as, at best, an untrustworthy news source, and, at worst, a shadow government disinformation puppet. In the words of old Latin: ‘Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus’ – False in one, false in all.

Research shows Zika not cause of Microcephaly

CBS continues its lying traditions with its Zika coverage. The lying eye network should at least research Zika virus history if it wishes to reclaim some semblance of credibility.  Amid the mad Zika hysteria put forth by CBS and other mainstream outlets shilling for Big Pharma’s vaccine “fixes,”  Brazilian doctors have quietly announced that the Zika virus, which has been around since at least 1947, is not solely and perhaps not even partly to blame for microcephaly, the small-headed baby syndrome.  Most of the women who have given birth to damaged babies lived in poverty stricken agricultural areas which use massive amounts of banned Monsanto pesticides. Most were also forcibly vaccinated while pregnant with a T-DAP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) vaccine. That mandated vaccination of pregnant women in northern Brazil that began in October 2014 perfectly paralleled the dramatic rise in microcephaly.  As insane as it may sound, the CDC also supports vaccinating pregnant women.

12,000 Zika cases in Pregnant women with no birth defects

According to a report from the New England Complex Systems Institute (NECSI), the very idea that Zika causes microcephaly is very much in doubt. The institute cites a New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) Study which followed nearly 12,000 Colombian women infected with the Zika virus. The data has shown no positive correlation between Zika and the small-headed baby birth defect.

An analysis revealed the rate of microcephaly to be what would be expected in any area, whether Zika is a factor or not, which is 2 cases in 10,000 births. According to NECSI:

“This gives a consistent interpretation that there is no direct link between Zika and microcephaly except for random co-occurrence.

We note that the base rate of microcephaly in the absence of Zika is 140 per year in Colombia, which is consistent with the approximately 50 microcephaly cases in the first [four] months of 2016, only [four] of which have been connected to Zika. When interpreting Zika as the cause, background cases must be subtracted.”

By June 2016, 11 total microcephaly cases had been reported in women with Zika infections in Colombia. If Zika and microcephaly are linked, NECSI pointed out that the total number of microcephaly cases should rise dramatically in the next few months, reaching more than 10 microcephaly-Zika births each week.

Poisoned Drinking Water

The government began poisoning Brazil’s water in an insane attempt to combat the overhyped threat of Zika, which may be increasing birth defects and continuing a vicious cycle that more vaccination could worsen.

NECSI also suggested, “An alternative cause of microcephaly in Brazil could be the pesticide pyriproxyfen, which is cross-reactive with retinoic acid, which causes microcephaly, and is being used in drinking water.”

Insane Naled Spraying

Meanwhile, Zika hysteria ginned up by CBS and other mainstream outlets has led to illegal spraying of the nerve toxin Naled in Miami and other areas of southeastern America. Miami residents are protesting their forced CDC poisoning. How soon before the CDC begins forcibly poisoning us all? We are all shrunken-headed babies now.

Vaccine Agenda pushed by CBS

Why the vaccine push? It’s the money, stupid. Vaccines make companies like Merck and others billions of dollars. People who work for the CDC often  move through the revolving door into “private practice.” Dr. Julie Gerberding went from director of CDC directly to president of Merck.  She merrily passed “Go” and made several millions more than the requisite $200. The CDC during her tenure had green-lighted several Merck products such as its dubious Gardasil and Zostovax shingles vaccines that have made the company billions.

Vaccines are the perfect business. They represent public risk for private profit; we take all the risks, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and other multi-national drug makers rake in all the profits. Vaccine makers are vaccinated by Congress against liability when their vaccines hurt or kill people, as they often do. Pay no attention to those flu vaccine deaths. Prepare for an avalanche of vaccine propaganda obscuring the real issues, such as the putrid CDC plan to remove our most basic human right of informed consent.

Related

Share