Is there really a Massive Flu Outbreak? Lies unravel Scandal

If there really is a “massive flu outbreak” – as all the mainstream news sources are telling us there is – chances are good that it has been caused by vaccinated people shedding the vaccine-unleashed virus, or by the flu vaccine itself causing flu-like symptoms.  Cogent arguments that question the flu vaccine’s effectiveness can be made given what we know of the vaccine’s faulty design (explained below), along with the CDC’s history of feeding us wild lies regarding deaths from the flu.  Worse, and what carries real freight in any argument questioning the effectiveness of the flu shot, is this: most cases reported as “the flu” are not the flu at all.

Flu Vaccine Industry Threatened by Science

It sounds insane, but it’s true, and no less a publication than the British Medical Journal has admitted it: The flu we thought we knew is usually not the flu.  This fact has been found by examining hundreds of thousands of people diagnosed with “the flu.”  The implications of that stagger the mind. They threaten the entire multi-billion-dollar flu shot industry, along with international drug cartels (legal in name only) like Merck (which also makes the dubious shingles vaccine) and GlaxoSmithKline, which have partnered with the CDC as well as U.S. politicians to sell us all the flu vaccine. The U.S. Government has spent billions of our tax dollars on less than worthless, but always potentially injurious, flu vaccines.

The Emotional Shot
The convoluted flu shot scandal cannot be explained in a palatable, Twitter-friendly sound bite; so most people will fail to read the fine print, just like most ignore the litany of those so-called “side effects” muttered at the end of a drug commercial.  Images of happy people playing flash in the mind, direct to the heart, to the emotional center, the reptilian hindbrain long on fear (and anger) and short on creative solutions. Better not to listen too attentively, or look too closely.  Better to let the emotions short-circuit the reasoning faculties, present the purest path to persuasion.

We accept the pretty pictures and ignore the muttered warnings at our peril.  100,000 people die every year from prescription drugs. The number injured from vaccinations is much higher, according to the Vaccine Adverse Reports System (VAERS), which all experts know records adverse events from a mere 1-10% of the actual total.  Those who don’t sicken quickly or drop dead in an obviously causal manner following vaccination may instead be struck with chronic illness, as any nasty vaccine adds a heavy load to the human body’s already toxic burden.

Flu Vaccine Causes Flu
Dr. Oz and Piers Morgan proved on national television that the flu “vaccine” causes the flu. Using Mr. Morgan as a guinea pig, the TV doctor had attempted to show us all that one cannot get the flu from the vaccine.  Mr. Morgan rolled up his sleeve on TV and Dr. Oz “inoculated” him with the influenza virus. And then God himself intervened. In a matter of days, the experiment wildly backfired. It succeeded only in revealing the larger truth, that the vaccine not only does not prevent the flu; the vaccine can and does cause the flu, or at least malicious symptoms which mimic “the flu.”

When the Flu is not the Flu
The term “the flu” always deserves quotation marks, because it turns out that what we usually call the flu is not the flu at all. It turns out that some 84% of people who were diagnosed with the flu did not have the flu at all.

Writing in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) online, Dr. Peter Doshi pulls back the CDC wizard’s curtain to reveal a monstrous fraud at work.  Dr. Doshi explains that hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients every year in the U.S. and tested in labs.  Of these “flu” samples, only a small percentage show the presence of an actual influenza virus.

Marketing Vaccines by Marketing Disease
Here’s the exact quote from Dr. Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):

“…[E]ven the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.”

(Cough, fever, chills, sore throat, muscle aches, weakness – all the basic flu symptoms can be caused by many factors that have nothing to do with a flu virus.)

Flu Vaccine Policies Based on Fiction

Dr. Doshi told the British Medical Journal that health officials “risk losing credibility by continuing to promote the fiction that mandatory influenza vaccine policies are based on solid evidence.  They are not, and it is time for healthcare institutions to do their own rigorous assessment of the evidence rather than continue this dangerous game of follow the leader.”

Sixteen Percent! (16%) Actually Have the Flue
This means that most Americans diagnosed by doctors with flu have no flu virus in their bodies. This means that most people who believe they have the flu, or who have been told by their doctors that they have the flu, do not have the flu.  (You can’t make this stuff up.)

As Jon Rappoport writes in nomorefakenews.com, “[E]ven if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those ‘flu cases’ that aren’t flu cases.”  That means the so-called “flu vaccine” could not possibly work.

Flu Vaccine 10% Effective
Health officials admit that this year’s flu vaccine is only 10% effective, yet they recommend you take the shot anyway. (Seriously? Seriously.) The shot is even less effective for the elderly, and has been so for the last several years, but that’s another fact you rarely, if ever, read or hear in the mainstream media putsch for total flu vaccine compliance. (Did you know some doctors are bonused by some insurance companies if they talk a certain percentage of their patients into vaccine compliance?) Elderly people taking the yearly flu shot also raise their risk of Alzheimer’s, likely because aluminum in the shot has been implicated in that disease. Children who take the flu shot are drastically more likely to suffer in any pandemic because the flu shot compromises their developing immune systems.  Any Science 101 class presented by any teacher with any basic understanding of biology would teach us that the flu shot does not strengthen the immune system; it weakens it, leaving any body tainted with the toxic flu vaccine cocktail at greater risk of contracting the disease du jour.

Virus Mutates in Chicken Eggs
Mr. Rappoport explains that this year’s flu vaccine is ineffective because of chicken eggs. Researchers have discovered that the flu virus placed in the vaccine mutates in chicken eggs. So by the time a person submits to the flu shot, she’s not being protected against this year’s seasonal flu virus. She’s being protected against a mutated virus that isn’t causing the flu this year. There’s a whole lot more to the story, of course – there always is with the “science” behind vaccination – but vaccines have been made using chicken eggs for the past 70 years. That means the flu vaccine has been ineffective for at least the last 70 years or so. That means the flu vaccine has NEVER worked as advertised.

The CDC’s Rank Dishonesty (Lying by any other name)
The CDC continues to push for mass vaccination by using the same basic tactic drug companies use to sell their dubious drugs: instill fear in the target.  In December 2005, the British Medical Journal online published another shocking report from Dr. Peter Doshi.  It’s one that should have put the Centers for Disease Control out of business, because CDC “experts” used to tell the press that the flu killed 36,000 Americans every year.

US Flu Deaths more PR than Science
Dr. Doshi’s report was titled, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412).  He wrote:

“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001 – 61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”

Did we read that right?

Like rolling a small pea under shuffling walnut shells, the CDC used a street-hustler’s sleight of hand to create one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths.  What?  Why? For what purpose?  For whose benefit?  (Most decidedly not ours.)  The CDC did it because they duplicitously and disingenuously make the absurd assumption that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.  It’s a glaring nonsensical non sequitur if ever there was one, because pneumonia has many causes.

18 Flu Deaths per Year (maybe), NOT 36,000

More pointedly, of all the flu and pneumonia deaths rolled into one big phony ball in a street hustler’s crooked game, a mere 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.

Therefore, the CDC could not say, with any assurance whatsoever, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001.  Total deaths from the flu was NOT 36,000. It was 18. Eighteen deaths.

Average of 1,350 flu deaths per year; NOT 36,000
Dr. Doshi continued his assessment of the CDC’s published flu-death statistics, in figures for flu separated out from pneumonia: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).”

This death toll is obviously far shy of the old 36,000 figure, and we don’t know how many of those flu deaths followed vaccination, or whether some or most of those 1,350 per year had been vaccinated.  This is one of the many glaring examples which shows the CDC actively engaged in promoting vaccination at the expense of the truth, and of our health, our lives.

And when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even further.

Cochrane: Widespread Manipulation on Influenza Vaccines

The Cochrane Collaboration reviewed all relevant data on flu vaccines. It concluded that there was considerable bias in prestigious journals towards studies funded by the very industry profiting from mass influenza vaccination. Cochrane found that influenza vaccine data was skewed by “widespread manipulation of conclusions.”  The Cochrane Collaboration concluded with a warning in all caps with bold letters.  Cochrane concluded, somewhat shockingly, by admitting that even their own bleak conclusions about the flu vaccine were shy of the real mark, given the bias in reporting from industry. It seems clear now that only industry bias keeps the whole flu shot scam afloat, like a cuttlefish squirting ink to hide from all those who would see it for what it is. The Cochrane Collaboration concluded its bleak influenza vaccine review with huge caveats.

“WARNING:

This review includes 15 out of 36 trials funded by industry (four had no funding declaration).  An earlier systematic review of 274 vaccine influenza studies published up to 2007 found industry funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological quality and size.  Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conditions favorable to the vaccines.  The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies.  The content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in light of this finding.”

Is there really a Massive Flu Outbreak? Lies unravel Scandal

The flu vaccine is all smoke and mirrors, promotion and hype, as the CDC – like the drug companies with which it partners – serves not us U.S. citizens but some other agenda.  Few in their right mind would submit to a flu shot if they knew just how dishonest the CDC has been in protecting our health, and how the flu shot has likely never worked as advertised and promoted by an unwavering propaganda campaign.

Related

Share

Lawsuit Settlements with Opioid Distributors & Makers

The federal government has recently settled several multi-million-dollar cases with opioid makers and distributors.  The government has recovered nearly $300 million in damages.  That may seem like a significant number, but it’s a very small drop in the bucket considering the heavy personal costs of the opioid crisis, which has killed more than 200,000 people from 2000-2016.  Every day, 52 Americans die from opioid painkiller overdoses, according to the CDC.  In purely financial terms, the crisis created by drug companies like McKesson has cost county and state governments billions of dollars.

Many other opioid lawsuits have since been filed by states’ attorneys general, and many more cases are expected to reach settlements, but here is a tally of recent settlements.

Lawsuit Settlements with Opioid Distributors & Makers

2017 – McKesson Corporation, the nation’s largest drug distributor, paid $150 million in a civil penalty for violating the Controlled Substances Act.  McKesson had failed to report “suspicious orders” for oxycodone and hydrocodone, such as those suspicious in frequency, size, or other patterns.  Government investigators wanted a $1 billion fine as well as criminal charges brought against McKesson.  They got only the small million fine and no charges.  The Washington Post reported that one DEA agent said, “We feel like our system was hijacked.”  It was hijacked, twice, first by McKesson and  and then by the nominal fine.  The Justice Dept. boasts it as a “record settlement“;  but it is inarguably paltry, given the real damages, and the fact that it was the company’s second offense.*

Related:  DEA Whistleblower – Justice Dept. coddled McKesson

Were the three strike rule in effect for corporations (which the Supreme Court ruled in the infamous Citizen’s United are people), as it is for comparatively tiny drug pushing offenders, the company would be put in jail for life upon its next transgression.

2017 – Mallinckrodt Plc, an oxycodone maker, agreed to pay $35 million to resolve U.S. investigations into its monitoring and reporting of suspicious orders of controlled substances. (Reuters has the story.)

2017 – Costco Wholesale agreed to pay $11.75 million to resolve allegations that its pharmacies violated the Controlled Substances Act. Costco improperly filled prescriptions for controlled substances. (See Justice Department Costco)

2017 – Cardinal Health reached a $20 million settlement with the state of West Virginia regarding the distribution of opioids between 2007 and 2012. In one six-year period, Cardinal and other wholesalers sent 780 million hydrocodone and oxycodone pills to West Virginia. That’s 433 per state resident. That time period saw 1,728 fatal overdoses from opioids in the state.  Columbus Business First has that story.

2016 – Cardinal Health, Inc. agreed to pay the U.S. $44 million to resolve allegations that it violated the Controlled Substances Act in Maryland, Florida and New York. Cardinal Health failed to report suspicious orders of controlled substances to pharmacies in those states.  The Washington Post has that story.

2015 – Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, agreed to pay Kentucky $24 million to settle a lawsuit that accused Purdue of misleading the public about the addictiveness of the prescription opioid.  CBS News has that story.

*2007/2008 – McKesson was fined $13.3 million by the Justice Dept. for mishandling prescription medicines, in a crime similar to its mishandling of opioids in its 2017  settlement.  (See the Justice Dept. announcement.)

McKesson vowed to do better, but failed.  Five months after the 2008 settlement, the board’s audit committee was notified of “serious deficiencies” in its system to spot suspicious opioid shipments, according to the Washington Post.  McKesson’s internal auditors claimed that some customers hadn’t yet been assigned thresholds for large orders that would trigger a review, and there was insufficient documentation to back up decisions to alter such limits for existing customers.  It’s a typical corporate ploy, to claim the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing.  But the sheer number of opiod orders, as in West Virginia (above) and elsewhere, renders that defense absurd.  Failure to follow through on promises included in the 2008 fine was largely what led to McKesson’s being fined again in 2017, for the paltry sum of $150 million.

Related

Share

The Flu Vaccine Hoax is Over

The year 2017 brought a treasure trove of new scientific evidence that proves once and for all that the flu vaccine hoax is over.  If you believe the flu vaccine works and is worth the risks of taking it, you simply haven’t read the latest research.  If you rely primarily on mainstream news for your flu vaccine information, you do so at your peril.

Top Five Reasons Why the Flu vaccine is a Bad Choice:

1.  The flu vaccine doesn’t work because of the way it is developed.

2.  The flu jab raises the risk of catching other types of flu.

3.  The flu vaccine raises the risk of dementia.

4.  No scientific studies prove the flu vaccine has ever been worth the risks of taking it.

5.  No significant scientific studies prove that those who take the flu vaccine and then get the flu (often from the vaccine itself) suffer less debilitating symptoms than refusing the shot would have rendered.

Related:  Shingles Vaccine?  Really?

Fake Vaccine News from Media Partners
News doesn’t get any more fake than the tiresome advertorial blitzkreig used to sell the so-called flu vaccine every year.

The flu vaccination business is a multi-billion-dollar cash cow gobbled up and regurgitated by all major media. CBS, NBC, ABC, MSNBC, Fox News, CNN, The New York Times, TIME, Reuters, USA Today – pick your news poison: they all rely on millions of dollars in advertising from pharmaceutical companies. Big Pharma is their number one client advertiser, and nothing pays Big Pharma like cheap vaccines. Cheap for them, as most are made in China (which has killed our pets with poisoned dog food, sickened us in our homes with toxic drywall; yet we trust the communist Chinese to pump mercury, aluminum, squaline and other toxins directly into our bloodstreams?)  Not so cheap for us, as we suffer the long-term costs of the flu shot to our financial, physical and emotional health.

Related:  Enormous Lies about Basic Vaccination

Vaccine Makers Vaccinated against Liability
Unlike other drug company products, vaccines offer a get-out-of-jail free card for vaccine makers, which have been vaccinated against liability by U. S. Government fiat, via the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Act.  Consequently, vaccine makers have nearly zero incentive to make vaccines safe and effective.  That little “detail” probably explains why no vaccine has ever been proven safe and effective. In 2017, Robert De Niro and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. offered a $100,000 reward to anyone who can prove any vaccine is safe and effective. Nobody has been able to do so and claim the reward.

Vaccine Industry Whitewashes Problems
What passes for government vaccine science is in reality propaganda produced by a corporate partnership between drug companies, the CDC, and mainstream media. There is no conspiracy here, folks.  It is an open secret.  Once something becomes a multi-billion-dollar industry, it takes on a life of its own, as it employs so many thousands of people with vested interests in maintaining the status quo.  (Somebody’s baby always needs new shoes.)

The CDC, in fact, uses our tax dollars to fund pro-vaccine groups  and trolls that ignore the latest science as they spew propaganda and misinformation online.

1. The flu vaccine doesn’t work because of the way it is developed.
As Jon Rappoport explains in a Nov. 2017 blog, referencing a PLOS Journal story published earlier that month, the chicken eggs used for culturing clinical isolates and for vaccines don’t work because “the influenza virus often mutates to adapt to being grown in chicken eggs, which can influence antigenicity and hence vaccine effectiveness.”

In addition, only a small percentage of the hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples taken from sick people every year contain the flu virus. This sounds insane but it’s true, and it knocks any notion of the flu vaccine’s effectiveness right out of the park.  Most diagnosis of the flu are not the flu, and there is no evidence whatsoever that taking a flu shot to check the influenza virus does anything at all to affect all those unknown sicknesses that are not the flu.

In fact, the opposite is true.  Taking the flu vaccine has been show to raise the risk of susceptibility to other viruses, like all of those who are sick with something besides the flu who are convinced it is the flu that they have.

2. The flu jab raises the risk of catching other types of flu. Vaccines suppress the immune system, period.  The long-term result is a weakened immune system which leaves the influenza jabbed person vulnerable to other types of flu, which are legion.

3. The flu jab raises the risk of dementia. The flu vaccine is laced with mercury, a known neurotoxin for which no safe dose exists.  It also contains aluminum, linked with Alzheimer’s, and glyphosate, implicated in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and kidney and liver problems.

4. No scientific study proves the flu vaccine is worth the risks of taking it. In fact, in almost any honest assessment, the flu shot has been shown to be virtually useless for the elderly. The flu vaccine has recently been implicated in miscarriages for pregnant women taking the shot. Few things are more insane than vaccinating a pregnant woman with anything, yet the CDC recommends that pregnant women take the flu shot. It would be laughable if it weren’t downright criminal to recommend such a thing.  See Dr. Russell Blaylock on vaccinating pregnant women.

5. No significant scientific studies prove that those who take the flu vaccine and then get the flu (perhaps from the vaccine itself) suffer less debilitating symptoms than not taking the shot would have rendered.  Even in the disinformation and misinformation and all the propaganda that litters the web from the CDC and other vaccine pushers, the best you will find is that taking the flu jab “may reduce” the symptoms if one then gets the flu. The American Society for Microbiology floats this  study after looking at only 155 people. Long recognized as an absurdity by thinking people, the vaccine industry finally realized they needed some evidence, however flimsy, to show the symptoms for the vaccinated were less severe. So they’ve come up with this little tidbit, that the vaccine may (italics ours) reduce the severity of flu symptoms.

That’s the best they’ve got?  Yeah, that’s the best they’ve got.  May is a well-known weasel word long used and abused by advertisers and snake oil salesmen of every stripe to appear to be making a claim.  In reality, may makes no claim at all.  It’s toothless propaganda.

The Flu Vaccine Hoax is Over
With the end of net neutrality ushered in by the FCC with a 3-2 vote along party lines last month, it will become harder and harder to dig out the truth of the ineffectiveness and the dangers of the flu vaccine on the web, but we must keep trying.  Our survival depends on it.  The end game for all of this vaccine propaganda and disinformation is to eventually force vaccination on all of us.  They’ve already killed informed consent in California.  Let’s wake up in 2018, before it’s too late to protect our inalienable rights.

Related

Share

Aspartame poisoning President Trump, many others

Aspartame poisoning is back in the news because President Trump drinks 12 diet sodas a day.  People on both sides of the political aisle are concerned for the man’s health, especially as he now contemplates war with North Korea, a possible nuclear conflagration that could destroy us all.  The U.S. President’s mental and physical health is a topic that concerns every man, woman, and child in the U.S. (as well as the world); and this is not another media attack piece on President Trump.  (Let’s all please be adults on this subject.)

Mainstream media, or at least Newsmax (and to some extent the Washington Post and N.Y. Times) has recently brought the issue to the fore (again).  Outlets have covered the carcinogenic and neurodegenerative effects of the 12 Diet Cokes a day that President Trump drinks.  Many sane people hope the attention will finally force the FDA to take aspartame off the market.  Removing this poison is a real possibility if mainstream media sites (whether full of fake news or not) keep covering the subject.

If those publications sound too far left for you, please consider that the ultra right-wing preacher Pat Robertson has also warned his flock about the dangers of aspartame, and one of the world’s leading experts on the subject has also sounded the alarm about aspartame poisoning.

Excitotoxins: The Taste that Kills
Perhaps most prominently, a Texas neurosurgeon named Dr. Russell Blaylock has said Mr. Trump’s aspartame consumption could lead to dementia and cancer.  Dr. Blaylock’s politics lean decidedly to the Right, so this is not, in any fashion, another concerted media attack on President Trump.  Dr. Blaylock’s book – Excitotoxins: The Taste that Kills – is arguably the most scientifically relevant treatise on the subject of aspartame.

Why an Aspartame Name Change?
Op-Ed News has noted, meanwhile, that ASPARTAME is being renamed AMINOSWEET by its makers AJINOMOTO.  Writer Stephen Fox legitimately asks, “What reason could Ajinomoto possibly have to rename ASPARTAME?”  Indeed.

NewsMax (with 1 million circulation in NYC) published an article by Sylvia Booth on Monday, Dec. 18, 2017.  Ms. Booth wrote:

“Media reports of President Donald Trump’s love of fast food, Diet Cokes, and extra desserts have dogged him since the primaries – a questionable diet he does little to deny. A recent New York Times article stated he drinks 12 Diet Cokes a day. Is Trump’s Diet Coke habit a real danger to his health? And if so, what business is it of ours? (She) inquired of the right person, Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock, former professor of Neurosurgery at the University of Mississippi Medical School.”

Dr. Blaylock responded: “Yes, drinking Diet Coke, especially in the large amounts reported, is a definite danger to his health. And since he’s our president, his health is our business, too.  If I were President Trump’s physician, I’d advise him to do whatever it takes to ditch diet drinks.”

Aspartame Harms the Brain
Several studies have shown that aspartame used in Diet Coke harms the brain.  Additionally, Mr. Trump is 70 years old; the damaging effects can be more pronounced on older folks.

Mr. Trump will end Demented on Aspartame
“The evidence of the damage they do is profound, and if he doesn’t get off this stuff, he’s going to end up demented,” says Dr. Blaylock, adding that he has seen “people who had to be institutionalized with dementia because they drank large amounts of aspartame.”

Aspartame raises Cancer Risk
Besides causing neurological problems, aspartame also increases cancer risks.

Dr. Blaylock said, “Two big cancers, lymphoma and leukemia, are the two most associated with diet drinks, but another big danger is pancreatic cancer.  Pancreatic cancer is exploding because people are drinking tons of these drinks.

They don’t just drink one a day; they are swilling massive amounts of it. President Trump can break this addiction. All he needs is to be convinced that he’s killing himself, and that his habit may ruin his mind.”

Quitting Aspartame Improves Brain Power
Dr. Blaylock said he has weaned several people off of aspartame, “and they were amazed at how their brain power improved, and how much more clearly they could think.”

Many studies have found diet drinks increase the risks of many dangerous conditions, especially those associated with aging.

Aspartame increased the risk of many maladies, including:
•  cancer
•  obesity
•  diabetes
•  stroke
•  insomnia
•  cardiovascular disease
•  weakened bones

Some mainstream media have covered the dangers of aspartame in the past, and Mr. Trump’s diet soda habit has gotten many to turn away from the artificial sweetener, the excitotoxin with a taste that kills.  Mr. Trump is decidedly stubborn, but let’s hope that he finds a good doctor and takes helpful advice to save his brain and his health.  Our lives may depend on it.

Op-Ed News

Mr. Fox in an Op-Ed News piece hopefully points out that the aspartame alert has brought some mainstream media papers into the fold (pun intended).

The Washington Post ran a story on the subject, albeit a minor one.  WaPo did at least mention the aspartame connection to stroke and dementia, writing:

“People who drank diet soda daily were three times more likely to develop stroke and dementia than those who consumed it weekly or less, according to a study published in April in the journal Stroke. The study found those who consumed at least one artificially sweetened drink a day, compared to less than one a week, were three times as likely to have an ischemic stroke from blood vessel blockage. They were also three times as likely to be diagnosed with dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. The effect of diet sodas persisted even if the researchers controlled for factors such as diabetes or high blood pressure.”

But of course WaPo had to follow with the obligatory disclaimer defense from industry lobbying groups like, the American Beverage Association, which said, “Low-calorie sweeteners have been proven safe by worldwide government safety authorities as well as “hundreds of scientific studies.”

Those “hundreds of studies” were virtually all done at the behest of the beverage industry, but the Post failed to point out that little fact, the same way it consistently fails to point out misleading material behind Monsanto defense statements about the company’s carcinogenic Roundup. Monsanto, coincidentally, formerly owned aspartame through its G.D. Serle affiliate. Monsanto has been in the business of poisoning food for a very long time.

Some things never change.

Related

•  Aspartame gets Mainstream Coverage

•   Monsanto Lawsuit

•  Roundup Cancer Lawsuit

•  Fox News on Aspartame Poison

•  Aspartame poisoning President Trump, many others

Share

How Big Pharma buries Vaccine Problems

Big Pharma buries vaccine problems the old fashioned way, with advertising money. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a fact. It is a cold, hard fact admitted by the CEO of the most watched news show on American television. It is a fact that should make any thinking person of only average intelligence (or perhaps even slightly below average intelligence) question whether or not the real story of anything ever appears on what most of us sloppily call “the news.”

Jon Rappoport reports from his web site “No More Fake News” just how Big Pharma controls the news and buries pharmaceutical drug and vaccine problems.

Big Pharma spends $3.2 Billion on TV Ads
Over the last 11 months, pharmaceutical companies have spent a staggering $3.2 billion on TV ads. In that time, Big Pharma has easily outspent all other industry advertisers combined. Big Pharma is without advertising peer.  It is easily “the news’” biggest customer.  Its money buys what editors call “friendly” or “complementary copy.”  Several billion dollars also buys a lot of silence on drug and vaccine safety issues.  That silence it buys, the missing information, the stories squelched, may be the most damaging aspect of all.

Mercury in Vaccines Problem Censored by “The News”
The extent of censorship became quite clear recently when Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. produced a film called “Trace Amounts,” about the mercury, aluminum and other toxic ingredients used in vaccines.  In an effort to garner some promotion for his film, he spoke to several network heads, including Roger Ailes, who was then CEO of Fox News (before his recent retirement following sexual harassment claims.)

The son of the murdered Senator Robert F. Kennedy asked Mr. Ailes, whom he had known since he was 17 years old, to give his film some spot somewhere on one of Fox’ 24-hour news stations.

Robert F Kennedy, Jr. said Mr. Ailes was very sympathetic with the toxic mercury issue.  Mr. Kennedy said he told the Fox News CEO, “‘I just want to go on one of your shows.  Nobody will allow me to talk about this or debate me.’  He [Ailes] said to me, ‘I can’t allow you on any of them. I’d have to fire any of my hosts that allowed you on my station.’  Because he said, ‘My news division gets up to 70% of advertising revenues during non-election years from the pharmaceutical companies’.”

Mr. Rappoport points out that foundations like Rockefeller and Gates make the medical/pharma agenda part and parcel of the Globalist agenda.  The end goal is total control of the news that people hear and the medical treatment they are allowed to pursue.  Insurance companies work with the AMA, pharmaceutical companies and their lackeys in the U.S. Congress and the courts to ensure that only medical procedures that benefit companies in the Globalist loop will be paid for by insurance. They’ll pay hundreds of thousands to kill you with chemotherapy (with a 97% failure rate), or pay for your worthless flu or dangerous shingles vaccine shot; but they won’t pay for an $18 vitamin B-12 shot, a simple massage, chelation therapy, or whatever other alternative procedure you might like to choose.  If you don’t think that healing has become a crime in some cases, you simply haven’t read enough. Read: When Healing Becomes a Crime for a good primer on the broken medical system.

Few people, for one example among dozens, know that the AMA lost a multi-million-dollar damage lawsuit after they conspired to discredit chiropractors. The AMA wanted to destroy the competition, and the game has gotten a lot dirtier now, and more under the radar, unless you are paying attention.

Rappoport asks: “How can you control billions of people, erase national borders, destroy untold numbers of communities and their traditions, wage senseless wars, send millions of jobs out of industrial countries to Third World backwaters, and build a de facto global management system – unless you can also debilitate, weaken, confuse, toxify, and thus pacify those billions of people?

The pharmaceutical empire is instrumental in this dirty work.

John D. Rockefeller and Dale Carnegie set out a hundred years ago to capture the medical industry. Using the diabolical Flexner Report and other ruses, they sought to establish a monopoly on medical treatment and the drugs which people would be allowed to use.  It was the beginning of a medical monopoly, of patenting dangerous and worthless drugs for profit, the beginning of the end for medical freedom and sound human health and the freedom for people to choose their own treatment.  Rockefeller and Carnegie used useful idiots like Morris Fishbein and the creation of the AMA to accomplish their goal, which they’ve largely succeeded in achieving.  Today Rockefeller medicine vultures squat over the rotting carcass of western medicine, exemplified in the gleaming medical palaces that are towering monuments to the loss of the tens of billions of dollars wasted on the so-called “War on Cancer,” a near total loss in what was and is a perverted ruse.

Related:  Rockefeller Medicine

Mr. Rappoport has long reported how “Rockefeller medicine” has led to some 106,000 deaths in the U.S. every year from government-approved medicines.  In the US and Europe, 330,000 die every year from correctly prescribed drugs, while 6.6 million are hospitalized, and some 80 million report adverse events following the “approved” and “proper” use of drugs and vaccines. These are all likely conservative estimates.

So why does everybody keep watching “the news”?  Old habits are tough to break.  We have been lied to for so long it is accepted by most of us, apparently, as business as usual.  That attitude can  be bad for one’s health.  It certainly is a sad situation in America, where our most heavily advertised people are the most obese and unhealthy in the world, and our children are the most vaccinated and the sickest in any modern society.

How Big Pharma buries Vaccine Problems

One must do a lot of research on the web today to learn something of importance, to remain healthy.

“Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty,” as Jefferson said.  So be it.

Related

Global Vaccine Cartel wreaks Destruction

•   Shingles Vaccine eye Damage

•  Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit

•  Vaccine Hysteria Reigns

•  How Big Pharma buries Vaccine Problems

Share

Vaccination Truth, Fake News, Internet Freedom

Vaccination truth is tightly tied with the current fight for net neutrality.  Corporations threatened by the truth want to slow it down on your browser, or make it disappear from google search results altogether. Those who do not have the truth on their side must resort to propaganda, either to control the spin or to turn black into white, war into peace, death into liberation. Already organic search results will bring up disinformation sites (like the dreadful ‘Snopes,’ for one).  In very recent history, fake news outlets like CNN, CBS, the Washington Post, New York Times and many other mainstream outlets delivered shameless propaganda, pure lies, to help war profiteers manufacture a casus belli for the Iraq invasion.  There are few crimes more treasonous or serious than manufacturing a fake casus belli which commits your country to an ill-advised war. For outlets like these, proven news fakers, to call fake news on legitimate “alternative news” sources (isn’t whatever one chooses to watch an ‘alternative’?) is quite simply ludicrous. (CNN’s latest lie is simply another in an endless litany.)

The old weapons of mass destruction lie regarding Iraq, which all the mainstream outlets repeated despite any evidence to back it, got our country into its longest-running war.  It has resulted in the deaths of at least a million people who never did us any harm, nor even had the means to do so. The fake news that sealed our fate and stole our nation’s bounty has also made our country an international pariah.   We could not have been brought this low without the aid of fake news.  Wrap yourself in Old Glory and bang your chest all you want and hate some enemies (real or imagined) as you will, nobody in this world survives without friends.  We have been made decidedly poorer, morally and financially, all of us, thanks in large part to our fake news outlets, which continue to misinform and disinform us daily, about almost everything.

The Truth Spills Out Regardless
The truth, regardless of the sea of fake news that never ends on our “Smart” TV screens and much of the internet, has a funny way of spilling out.  Corporations know this. The fight over net neutrality is a fight for truth vs. propaganda. If corporations have their way, they will slow down any and all information that doesn’t back their bottom line. The current battle over internet freedom is also a watershed moment for vaccination truth.

Follow the Money

The vaccine market today is worth close to $24 billion.  A report titled ‘Global Human Vaccines Market 2016-2020’ gives an in-depth view of the possible revenues and emerging global market trends.  It says that by 2020 the vaccine market will be worth $62 billion.  That much money will buy a lot of advertising, and friendly promotional coverage.

No Conspiracy. An Open Secret.
The internet has taught us all many things that we likely would not have learned otherwise. The internet is obviously a huge moneymaker for corporations, but it is also a two-edged sword for them. The fight for vaccination truth is one very big front in this battle. The U.S. government has paid out billions of dollars to vaccine-injured children and their families saddled with vaccine-crippled children, but they never run that story in the mainstream news. Why not? Conspiracy? No, it’s all an open secret.

Vaccination Lies Promoted, Covered up by CDC, Big Pharma, MSM
Whistleblowers at the CDC and former employees of Merck Pharmaceuticals have shown us that we are being lied to about the safety and efficacy of vaccination. One fugitive author of a fraudulent vaccine safety report still used by the CDC to justify forced vaccination on our children is still at large, while his handiwork, his web of lies, is still used by the CDC to justify mass vaccination.

Shingles Vaccine Lawsuits
Meanwhile, shingles vaccine lawsuits are being filed by people who have lost their eyesight from the live shingles vaccination made by Merck. Many have developed shingles FROM the vaccination, just as many develop flu from the influenza vaccine (so-called).

Flu Vaccine causes Flu
Piers Morgan showed us how to develop flu from vaccination on national television. He took the flu shot from Dr. Oz on his show. The two were supposed to show all of us yokels how the flu shot not only did not cause the flu, but was safe and would prevent it. The little tableaux accidentally gave the whole game away when Morgan soon came down with the flu after taking the shot. Dwight Yoakum joked with him about it on a subsequent episode. He must not have gotten the memo to keep that on the down low.

Sacrifice the Children?
What gives? Are the vaccine injured children sacrifices we give to the Gods to keep the rest of us healthy, like Druids throwing children into the bog so that the Gods may grant us fecundity?  Is it all okay just so long as you and your children submit to the government-approved vaccinations and are not (apparently) injured by them?

Vaccines are Safe and Effective Myth
The biggest, most tiresome myth we endlessly hear is that vaccines are safe and effective. Vaccines are not safe, as even a casual reading of any vaccine package insert reveals. Thousands of adverse events from vaccination are reported to the VAERS database each year, including many deaths following vaccination. The numbers reported to VAERS are merely 1-10% of the actual adverse events. Everyone who knows anything about vaccination or adverse drug events knows this is true. Therefore, there are a bare minimum of 10,000 adverse events from vaccination yearly, and likely more than 100,000.

Congress: Vaccines Unavoidably Unsafe
The U.S. Congress, which gave us the 1984 Childhood Immunization Act – which vaccinated vaccine makers against liability, hence removing any incentive they had to actually make vaccines safe OR effective – has called vaccines “unavoidably unsafe.”  How can vaccines be both safe (as most of our doctors tell us they are) and unavoidably unsafe?  Why do we accept these blatant contradictions as some sort of gospel truth?  How can we?  Have we all mastered the absurd art of “Doublespeak” as seen in George Orwell’s 1984?  Do we take our shots and risk our health and lives, and the lives of our children, because fake news master CNN says so? Because Fox News reporters say so? Because Rachel Maddow says we should? Because Comedy Central makes fun of “anti-vaxxers”? Do we accept as science today whatever our mainstream outlets – be they left or right leaning – say is science?

Vaccines are not Effective
No definitive science has ever shown that any vaccine has ever been proven effective on human beings. There is no definitive science which proves any vaccines is effective, that any vaccine actually works, that any one vaccine is worth the risk of taking it. So how does it come to pass then, that vaccine makers and their partner, the CDC – which owns 57 vaccine patents itself, is also in the business of vaccination, part of the market supply chain – how DO they claim vaccines are effective?

Vaccine Safety Depends on the Meaning of “is”
It is more than a little like Bill Clinton saying, “It depends on what the meaning of is is.” In the vaccine makers world – a parallel universe ungoverned by sensibility, honesty, or practicality – a vaccine is said to be “effective” when it can be shown to trigger antibodies to the disease the vaccinated person has been shot with. But. . . wait for it. The presence of antibodies in no way correlates with immunity. That’s right. There is NO scientific evidence anywhere to prove that simply producing antibodies as a result of the artificial immunity resulting from vaccination gives one any immunity at all, to anything.

Vaccine Autism Link
It is a well accepted myth that vaccines don’t cause autism. Why is that? Vaccines DO cause autism, and the U.S. Government has admitted it. The government has paid vaccine-injured children and the parents of those poor children who developed autism following vaccination. Our government has paid out more than $3 billion dollars for vaccine-related injuries, including those in which vaccines were linked with autism. See it here: Project Censored: U.S. Vaccine Court paid $3 Billion to Vaccine Injured Families

Vaccine Autism Link is Real
In March, 2008 the U.S. Government conceded that mercury containing vaccines can cause autism in children.

A child named Hannah Poling got autism from vaccinations. At 18 months old, she was given shots for nine diseases. Two shots contained thimerosal. Within 48 hours of the shots, Hannah became ill. She lost her ability to walk. She couldn’t sleep through a night. Within three months, she showed signs of autism. The shots resulted in a brain disorder “with features of autism spectrum disorder.” (That’s as close as they ever get to admitting it, hedging as much as they can to help continue the tiresome ruse.) The US Department of Health and Human Services determined that Hannah’s family is entitled to compensation from the federal vaccine injury fund. Put together by the U.S. Congress in 1984 to save drug companies from real liability, this “fund” is built on taxpayer money made from the sale of toxic vaccines. More than 5,000 vaccine autism cases are pending right now in the Federal “Vaccine Court.”

The Danish Study Hoax still cited by CDC and MSM
Fugitive Poul Thorsen is the “author” of the Danish Autism Study (a complete myth) that attempted to prove vaccines and autism have no correlation; scientifically referred to as the “Denmark Study.” After using fraudulent data to distort the truth about the human health dangers of being injected with mercury in vaccines, and more specifically the MMR vaccine combination, Thorsen, leader of the fraudulent study, was deified by the CDC as a genius who had discovered something monumental. Then. . . Newsflash! It was all shown to be a big cover up, which the CDC is still using so it doesn’t have to admit its own research had found out about the autism/mercury link back in 2004. See also the William Thompson whistleblower case shown in the film Vaxxed.

Vaccination Truth, Fake News, Internet Freedom

Here’s the punch line. Even though Thorsen is a wanted criminal today, for embezzlement, he remains even now as the central figure behind the CDC’s claims disputing the link between autism spectrum disorder (the whole array of central nervous system, neurological and brain dysfunctions) and mercury in vaccines (and flu shots-still). Even now. So the CDC is now just as guilty of fake news as the mainstream media news fakers.

Related

•  Vaccine Lottery: Sacrifice the Children

•  Shingles Vaccine?  Really?

•  Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit

•   True Disclosure.: The Real vaccine Story

•  Vaccination Truth, Fake News, Internet Freedom

Share

Talc Asbestos Case settled by Colgate-Palmolive

Another talc asbestos case was recently settled by Colgate-Palmolive. On October 30, 2017, the consumer products giant once again chose to pay for the link between the company’s Cashmere Bouquet talcum powder and deadly asbestos exposure.

The New York-based company was sued by a Pennsylvania woman who developed mesothelioma after using the talcum powder product for more than 20 years.  According to court filings, Colgate-Palmolive avoided a trial in a New Jersey state court by reaching the undisclosed settlement.

Plaintiff Carol Schoeniger alleged that Colgate-Palmolive failed to warn her of risks associated with using Cashmere Bouquet.  She claimed that inhaling the asbestos-contaminated talc product caused her cancer.

Ms. Schoeniger’s case is the latest of several in which talc users accuse talc product makers of selling them products that pose serious health risks.

More than 170 Talc Cancer Mesothelioma Cases
Colgate-Palmolive faces more than 170 lawsuits from people who claim the company sold them talcum powder that contained asbestos.  The company has resolved 43 talc asbestos cases so far in 2017, according to Bloomberg News.

Talcum powder was routinely in American homes for more than 100 years. Colgate-Palmolive made Cashmere Bouquet from 1871 to 1985, marketing it until 1995.

Moisture Phobia drives Talc Sales
Some sort of moisture phobia appears to lurk behind the human craze for talc.  Despite this talc asbestos lawsuit and others involving a talc link to ovarian cancer, talc is still sold today and used in many products.  People seem drawn to its ability to absorb moisture and soften the skin in some areas.

Talc with Asbestos
Prior to the 1970s, reports showed some talc products contained traces of asbestos dust, a result of talc and asbestos minerals often appearing near each other in the natural world.

Long Latency Period for Mesothelioma

Inhaling or ingesting asbestos fibers can lead to serious health problems, including asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma.  The latency period for these diseases is usually decades. It may take 20-30 years or more for people exposed to asbestos-contaminated talc products to exhibit symptoms of talc-related problems.

Related:  Talc Powder Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Judith Winkel Case Precedent
In 2015, a California jury awarded Judith Winkel $13 million over her mesothelioma claim tied to Cashmere Bouquet.  That was the first verdict against Colgate-Palmolive for asbestos exposure from commercial talcum powder.  But few know what she was actually awarded in damages, as Ms. Winkel later agreed to a confidential settlement with the company.

Cashmere Boquet Talc
Cashmere Bouquet contained talc mined by Imerys Talc North America, the world’s leading talc producer.  Imerys’ Yellowstone open-cast mine in Montana is the country’s biggest talc mining operation.

Talc Asbestos Case settled by Colgate-Palmolive

A spokeswoman for Imery’s, Gwen Myers, told Bloomberg in an email: “Imerys’ firm position is that talc is safe, and that position is backed by the consensus of government agencies and professional scientific organizations that have reviewed the safety of talc.’’

Colgate-Palmolive Files Motion with Philadelphia Court
The company has asked a judge to reconsider dismissing the first asbestos-related talc case in Philadelphia after the court rejected the testimony of two key experts for the plaintiffs.  Colgate-Palmolive filed a motion for summary judgment Oct. 23.

Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Idee Fox barred the experts from testifying in October in the case of Brandt v. Colgate-Palmolive.  The Philly-filed lawsuit alleges Sally Brandt developed mesothelioma from using asbestos-contaminated talcum powder from 1954 to 1970.

California Appeals Court Reverses Summary Judgment
In a separate but related case, a California appeals court reversed a summary judgment Oct. 20 in a Colgate-Palmolive asbestos lawsuit.

The three-justice panel of the California Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3, ruled the trial court made a mistake in granting Colgate-Palmolive summary judgment over allegations that Cashmere Bouquet contained asbestos and caused plaintiff Mary Lyons to develop mesothelioma. Ms. Lyons was diagnosed in October 2015.

In the unanimous decision, the appeals court ruled Ms. Lyons had provided enough evidence to warrant a trial, which is pending.

“All or most of the Cashmere Bouquet that [Lyons] used almost daily for 20 years contained harmful asbestos,” said Justice Stuart Pollak in the 3-0 ruling.  Judge Pollak also noted there was no evidence Ms. Lyons had been exposed to asbestos from any other source.

Related

•  Talcum Mesothelioma Cancer Lawsuit

•  Talc Powder Ovarian Cancer Link

•  Talcum Powder Cancer Attorney

•  Talc Asbestos Case settled by Colgate-Palmolive

 

Share

Nurses fired for fighting Vaccine Mandates

More people arguably die from taking the flu shot – or are injured by it – than die from the flu each season. But that hasn’t stopped hospitals from forcing flu shots on their employees.  Some are fighting back.  Many nurses who have seen vaccine damaged people up close are fighting back. The nurses are claiming their right to informed consent, which is the first rule of medicine.  Informed consent is also a basic human right. Nazi doctors who experimented on prisoners were executed for violating that rule in WWII.  Removing  informed consent violates the Nuremberg Code, which begins with informed consent. Nevertheless,  nurses are now being fired for having the temerity to claim that basic right.  How have we reached this tipping point?

Vaccine Damage trumps Fear-Mongering Propaganda

More and more people are discovering that vaccination can come with a litany of dangerous health problems which can be much worse than whatever malady the vaccine maker claims its vaccine will prevent.  Big Pharma’s answer to this elephant in the room that threatens billions of dollars in profits has been to have congress vaccinate them against liability lawsuits.  Their next move was to have those same congressional lackeys force vaccination on more and more people.  This represents quite a nice little business model.  Unless one traffics in illegal weapons’ sales or illicit drugs, there’s not a better one in the world.  Mandatory vaccination means nearly limitless profits with near zero accountability.

Secret Vaccine Court works outside Democratic Law

Yes, the so-called “vaccine court,” a secret government tribunal that allows plaintiffs no discovery, has paid out more than $3 billion to vaccine-injured children or their surviving families. That “court,” however, refuses to pay nearly 80 percent of its claimants.  The victims are mostly made toothless by being forbidden to conduct legal discovery.  Anyone not allowed legal discovery faces a nearly insurmountable task of proving up a case.

Is there a Safe Vaccine Anywhere?

Any real court which would give vaccine-injured plaintiffs a chance to prove up their cases.  That would give the whole vaccine game away.  Robert DeNiro (who has a vaccine-injured son) and Robert Kennedy, Jr. offered up a $100,000 reward to anyone who can prove any vaccine safe and effective.  That reward goes unclaimed.  No science exists to prove any vaccine is safe or effective. Congress, in one of its rare truthful moments, has called vaccination “unavoidably unsafe.”

Simple refusal to let somebody shoot a witches’ brew of toxins (mercury, aluminum, squaline, pig cells, etc.) into your bloodstream should suffice to end the discussion. But unfortunately, it no longer does. More and more states are falling in line with the great nanny state of California.  Meanwhile, the nurses’ refusal to claim their rights is costing many of them their jobs. Why is this huge story being buried by the mainstream media? Follow the money.

Money Drives Vaccine Mandates
Anything that doesn’t help promote mass vaccination, that doesn’t support state-sponsored propaganda that all vaccines are safe and effective, fails to make the news. The news is mostly paid for by Big Pharma advertising dollars, by the same companies that make billions of dollars from forcing vaccinations on people That’s not mere cynicism talking. That’s life. Truth.

Most people tend to believe whatever they think is in their best interests. Corporations think the same way, in spades, the only difference being that they have the money to control the debate and further their own interests. Big Pharma has used its billions in profits to buy news outlets, politicians, judges, bloggers, all manner of internet trolls, and what else you got? (Are you an out- of-work writer? Look around and you can easily find a job as an internet troll. How tough can it be to tell people they are nuts for thinking vaccination is related to autism, or any other health problem, despite thousands of parents reporting that they saw it with their own eyes. All you need do is repeat the propaganda that there is no evidence vaccines cause autism. If they point out a former CDC scientist, William Thompson has blown the whistle on the agency’s faking the data which did show a vaccine autism link, you can just ignore that fact and carry on repeating your talking points, the same ones used all over the mainstream media.)

Advertising Money Screams

John Lennon said money doesn’t talk, it screams.  That was never truer than with advertising money.  Merck, makers of the dangerous MMR vaccine and the worthless but dangerous shingles vaccine, spent $205.5 million on advertising in 2014: $95 million on TV ads, $74.1 in magazines, $35 million in newspapers, $467,000 in radio (a half million is plenty for radio; nobody listens to it anymore).

More than $205 million in advertising money will easily buy you what marketers call “complementary copy.” It can also buy you silence, or a serious slant against anything that threatens the vaccine gravy train. It’s like the old joke about borrowing money from a bank. If you borrow enough, the banker becomes your partner. Advertisers with enough money become partners with the media they support. It is a very simple formula. There’s no conspiracy theory here. It is an open secret. But it’s not too secret.

In our age, if you don’t like a fact, you can just pay some money and make it go away.  Those with enough money can make something seem true even if it’s not.  (See also:  Operation Mckingbird, which continues today).  If you own enough congressmen, you may even be able to convince some people that we invaded Iraq to implant democracy there, that we do “regime change” in other countries because we think that’s what is best for them, or that “Citizen’s United,” letting the Koch brothers and other corporate chieftains spend unaccountable millions in state and national elections, has been good for the country.

The nanny state of California began this outrage. California legislators removed informed consent for childhood vaccinations, hence forcing a long list of vaccines on their schoolchildren. It fails to make the mainstream news that the list of mandated vaccines grows longer and longer yearly, in direct proportion to American schoolchildren growing sicker and sicker. It also fails to make the news that Big Pharma lobbyists work hand in fist with the CDC and the money-hungry U.S. Congress, lengthening that list every year, to further pad drug maker profits for Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and other vaccine profiteers.

Nurses fired for fighting Vaccine Mandates

Nevertheless, many people are still fooled by the ludicrous claim that when they get the flu after taking the shot, the “symptoms” are not as bad as they would have been had they not taken the shot.  These are likely the same people who watch infomercials, or sit in the audiences of them, mouths agape, to help sell products to easily duped others.

Related

•  Vaccination History, Thinking Person

•  Flu Vaccine Deaths Mount

•  Shingles Vaccine? Really?

•  Shingles Vaccine eye Damage

•  Vaccine Hysteria Reigns

•  Mother Jailed for Refusing Vaccinations

•  Nurses fired for fighting Vaccine Mandates

Share

Onglyza Heart Failure Warning leads to Lawsuits

In 2016, the FDA called for stronger heart-failure warnings on the Onglyza label of AstraZeneca’s Type 2 diabetes drug. Since then, AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb (AZ’s former partner) have been hit with 14 lawsuits over Onglyza’s heart-failure risks.

Filed in the District of New Jersey, the lawsuits claim the drugmakers failed to warn users that Onglyza and a related combination product called Kombiglyza XR can cause cardiac arrest, congestive heart failure and death.

The New Jersey Law Journal reports plaintiffs charge that the Big Pharma duo began marketing Onglyza in 2009 before conducting clinical trials to see whether the drug increased users’ cardiac risks. Plaintiffs say the two ignored 2008 FDA guidance that urged drug companies to “demonstrate that” new therapies “will not result in an unacceptable increase in cardiovascular risk.”

An AstraZeneca spokeswoman said in a statement that the company “is confident in the safety and efficacy of Onglyza, when used in accordance with the FDA approved label, which has been established through clinical trials. We will vigorously defend against the allegations made by the plaintiffs.”

Some 150 to 200 Onglyza cases are pending so far across the U.S., but that number could eventually reach the thousands.

Onglyza Heart Failure Warning leads to Lawsuits
Onglyza’s heart risks most recently made the news in April 2016 when the FDA insisted the drug’s label include a warning of increased heart-failure risk. It wasn’t the only drug that regulators targeted, however. The FDA also required Takeda to update the labels for fellow DPP-4 Nesina and combinations Kazano and Oseni.

Januvia Outcomes Study for Merck
Merck’s DPP-4 drug Januvia did not suffer the same fate as Onglyza. A 2015 outcomes study seemed to exonerate Januvia. Later in 2015, a new analysis of the trial called TECOS – showed that even Type 2 diabetes patients with cardiovascular disease and a history of heart failure could take Januvia without increasing their risk of CV complications.

In April 2017, however, the FDA shot down Merck’s attempt to add the TECOS results to the labels of Januvia and combination drugs Janumet and Janumet XR.

DPP-4 is not the only diabetes class where AstraZeneca’s drugs face heart-related questions. The company is now running an outcomes study designed to show whether its SGLT2 drug Farxiga can match rival Jardiance (from Eli Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim) at cutting the combined incidence of heart attack, stroke, and cardio-vascular-related death in high-risk patients.

Related
•  Onglyza Lawsuit

•  Onglyza Diabetes Drug linked to Heart Failure

•   Onglyza Heart Failure Warning leads to Lawsuits

•  Onglyza Heart Warnings Needed, says FDA

•  Dangerous Drugs

Share

Mother Jailed for Refusing Vaccines

A Michigan mother who refused to vaccinate her son was sentenced by a judge in October 2017 to seven days in prison.

Detroit-area mother Rebecca Bredow told local ABC News affiliate WXYZ that a judge had ordered her to vaccinate her 9-year-old son. The Associated Press reported Oct. 4 that Ms. Bredow was sentenced by Judge Karen McDonald. The judge ruled that Bredow’s ex-husband (the son’s father) “gets a say” in the decision. Part of that say, apparently, was the judge’s belief she had some “right” to sentence a mother to prison for exercising her parental rights to do what she thinks best for her child.

Parents Disagree on Vaccinations

Sadly, the estranged couple disagree on vaccination of their son, and the father was able to manipulate the legal system into putting his former wife behind bars for exercising her own parental rights.

The two parents have shared custody of their two children, but Ms. Bredow is the primary caregiver. Ms. Bredow told the judge that she takes “full responsibility” for her actions, but that she is philosophically opposed to vaccinating her son.

Judge assumes Mother Role

Ms. Bredow told the judge:  “I am an educated vaccine-choice mother and I have signed vaccine waivers and have been fully compliant with all state laws for both of my children for every school year,” she said.   The judge appeared very unsympathetic, prompting Ms. Bredow’s family members to suspect she handed down the sentence to make a point.

Judge Karen McDonald clearly has too much say in the lives of Michigan citizens.  In a tape of the trial, she orders,  “I want to make it perfectly clear: We’re leaving here today.  Dad’s picking the child up and he’s going to be vaccinated regardless of what Mom did or didn’t do.”

So the real mother’s wishes don’t count in the judge’s view.  But the fake mother, the judge, will not have to deal with the repercussions of the vaccines if something goes wrong.  As Joel Dorfman of the group Michigan for Vaccine Choice says: “If this child is injured because of being given eight immunizations, who do you think is going to take care of the child?  The judge?”

WXYZ reported in October 2017 that Ms. Bredow was “sentenced for contempt of court.”

The judge had given the mother one week to get her son vaccinated, but she did not follow the demand, citing her first amendment rights, her parental rights, her basic human rights, and her and her son’s right of informed consent.

The Nazi health network in Michigan which had informed on Ms. Bredow found that she had been ignoring their forced vaccination edicts for a while.  Documents the news station obtained state that a court previously asked Ms. Bredow to get immunizations for her son in November 2016, but she refused to bow to the court’s pressure.

Imprisoned Mother backs Informed Consent
“I would rather sit behind bars for standing up for what I believe in than giving into something I strongly don’t believe in,” she said during a television interview with WXYZ.  “God forbid he were to be injured by one of the vaccines, then what – that’s what scares me.”

Ms. Bredow has said she is not opposed to vaccines, but she believes it was the right decision for her family.

Many States now preempt Citizen’s Rights
In the United States, policies for childhood immunizations are controlled by the state.  (Much like the old Nazi system, “the state,” claimed to control its citizens from cradle to grave.)  The National Vaccine Information Center lists Michigan as one of more than a dozen states that allows all three vaccination exemptions: religious, philosophical and medical grounds.  Most states in the U.S. no longer permit families to forgo vaccines for philosophical reasons.  California has killed informed consent altogether, largely with the help of career politicians like Richard Pan, who took money from Merck, maker of the dubious MMR vaccine. Merck makes billions of dollars in vaccination profits, and it has been vaccinated against liability by the U.S. Congress and the corporation-controlled Supreme Court.  Vaccine makers, hence, have zero incentive to make vaccines that work, or that are not unavoidably unsafe.

Current Michigan state law requires students in all schools to have certificates of immunization for admittance into kindergarten, seventh grade or a new school district.

Michigan’s Corporate Control harms Citizens

If the state of Michigan really cared about the health of its citizens, maybe it would overturn its state representatives overturning Michigan law so that Michigan citizens injured by drugs or medical devices no longer have redress to sue the companies which made dubious products that injured or killed them. If Michigan really cared about the health of its citizens, maybe it would not have brain damaged thousands of children and adults in Flint by allowing private enterprise to poison the city water supply.

Mother Jailed for Refusing Vaccines

More than any state in the nation, Michigan backs corporate control over citizens’ rights. Those who care about their health or their human rights would be wise to move out of Michigan, or vote out their career politicians beholden to corporate money. Their lives may depend on it.

Bad Precedent

How many people see just what a horrible precedent this sets?  If a judge can erase a real mother’s wishes to do what she believe best for her child – regardless of where you stand on the vaccination issue – what can’t a judge decide?  We are at the door of medical tyrrany.  It is time to wake up and take back our right to informed consent, and take back our country from politicians beholden to Big Pharma profits.  Our human rights and our health depend on our ability to make our own health choices, not have them determined by political whores and activist judges.

Related

•   Vaccine Hysteria Reigns

•  Sacrifice the Children:  The Vaccine Lottery

•   Shingles Vaccine?  Really?

•  Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit

•  Mother Jailed for Refusing Vaccines

 

Share