Vaccine Injuries hidden by Media

Lies of omission vaccine-epidemiccan be just as damaging as blatant stated lies. You know, like those mainstream media outlets – CNN, The New York Times, Washington Post, etc. – gave us about Iraq harboring weapons of mass destruction (Read: distraction). Vaccine injuries are hidden by mainstream media deeper than those non-existent WMDs. The media bury vaccine injuries by omitting them entirely from the “news.” (In similar fashion,  mainstream newsfakers lied about Bernie Sanders by blacking him out, as proven by a Harvard study.)

Mainstream Media Vaccine Injury Lies

The only thing you ever hear from mainstream media is the endless lie that no evidence links vaccines and autism. For the thousands of kids and their parents suffering autism after vaccination, it is an unconscionable, hateful lie.  The country’s so-called “vaccine court” has paid out more than $3 billion to vaccine injured children and their families. The court paid a multi-million dollar award in the Hannah Poling case, though likely only because her father was a neurosurgeon whose personal knowledge couldn’t be denied, unlike 80% of the vaccine-injured kids and their families who are turned back by the same secret court. Many people die from the flu shot every year. Many have died from Merck’s nightmarish Gardasil vaccine.  Many have died following the so-called Zostavax, a shingles vaccine. More than two dozen studies suggest a link between vaccines and autism.

Vaccine Safety Study pulled from Web

One of the latest vaccine safety studies was a peer-reviewed scientific study that showed a link between vaccines and health. The study examined vaccinated vs. unvaccinated kids, which no study had done in this manner before. The study showed vaccinated kids three times more likely than unvaccinated ones to be diagnosed with autism and other neurological disorders and health problems. This study, however, was pulled from the internet after being heavily criticized by shills and trolls for the $50 billion vaccine industry.

666 Children
The results vaccineworkedof this first-ever study to compare the health of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated kids was accepted November 2, 2016, then published online in Frontiers in Public Health. The study compared kids’ health by surveying 412 mothers of 6-12 year olds. Nearly 40 percent of the total of 666 children had never been vaccinated, a control group adequate to provide a comparison against children who had been vaccinated.

No Control Group?
For years Big Pharma and its CDC enablers and revolving door opportunists like Julie Gerberding have argued that establishing a control group for vaccination is unethical, under the bloody assumption (unbacked by any evidence whatsoever) that vaccines work as their makers say they do, and that they cause no harm to the vaccinated that is not ‘balanced’ by the harm which failing to vaccinate the masses would cause. It’s the funky logic of a Vaccine Lottery which sacrifices some children for the good of all (in the parallel universe of Big Pharma and the CDC where people are not ends in themselves), at least in theory, if the bastards who support the larger agenda for their own enormous profits were even halfway honest with us at all, given the FACT that so many children and adults are injured and/or killed by vaccination.

(Related: See the movie Big Pharma and the CDC don’t want you to see: Vaxxed.)

Like a warplane that takes more flak as it threatens its target, the latest study published just this year took so much criticism from lobbyists and mainstream media hacks that it was then unpublished by the journal. One can only ask why. The answer is easy. If the study is sound, it represents earth-shattering evidence that suggests the entire vaccine paradigm and program is fundamentally flawed. But that couldn’t be the case, could it?

The study abstract stated:

“A total of 415vaccine-epidemic mothers provided data on 666 children, of which 261 (39%) were unvaccinated. Vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDDs (defined as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and/or a learning disability).”

The study further concluded:

“In this study based on mothers’ reports, the vaccinated had a higher rate of allergies and NDD than the unvaccinated. Vaccination, but not pre-term birth, remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors. However, pre-term birth combined with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.”

The Authors

The authors were certainly not heavyweights in the field, which is mostly controlled by experts paid by Big Pharma, people like Paul Offit, who has made millions from creating at least one “vaccination” himself, and promoting the whole CDC vaccination program from bully pulpits endlessly provided by the MSM.

The paper was peer-reviewed by Linda Mullin Elkins, a chiropractor at Life University, and Kelly Hsieh from the University of Illinois at Chicago. It was edited by Amit Agrawal at Gandhi Medical College in India.

The initialvaccinate-this backlash came from public comments which claimed the study was poorly designed, (It’s true that any study can be designed to get the results one wants. Right, CDC? Right, Big Pharma?). Criticisms also claimed that relying on mothers for self reporting was faulty. The study was further criticized as “antivaccinationist” and “bogus.” The usual“anti-vaxxer” name calling predominated, as it always does when a study threatens the CDC’s pro-vaccination program, Big Pharma profits, and MSM drug company advertising money. Not for a nickel does the mainstream media parrot the junk science backing forced vaccination.

Dr. Graham Downing, a Neuro-musculoskeletal and Functional Medicine consultant in the UK, has found that vaccinating pregnant women increases inflammation in their bodies and also increases the risk of releasing inflammatory markers in their fetuses/infants. Such releases include phenotypes, which can alter an individual. Dr. Russell Blaylock has also explained at length why there can be nothing more insane than vaccinating a pregnant woman.

Vaccine Injuries hidden by Media

Investmentwatchblog.com reports that this first study into vaccinated versus unvaccinated children has not only been unpublished by Frontiers In Public Health, but also taken down from the internet. To aid in the free flow of information which used to be a hallmark of our democracy, we have cached the study here:

screen-shot-2016-11-28-at-09-36-00

Related

Share