Clinton Backs Monsanto, GMOs

Many people who Hillary Monsanto Moneysupported Hillary Clinton for President apparently didn’t know or perhaps don’t care that she is a longtime supporter of Monsanto and GMO foods. (Bernie Sanders, by contrast, is most decidedly NOT a GMO Yes man.) Monsanto’s bid to monopolize the world’s seed supply is part and parcel of the globalists’ attempt to eliminate all viable borders between nation states. Proponents of Monsanto’s carcinogenic glyphosate know no borders, recognize no fence lines, abide no dissent.

Monsanto, which is in process of being bought by the war criminal Bayer Company (if corporations are people, as the US Supreme Court ruled, why can’t they be prosecuted as people?), collects politicians around the world with various campaign donations, personal favors, and a long list of tit for tat arrangements under the table.

Mrs. Clinton – Monsanto Lawyer

In Mrs. Clinton’s case, her Monsanto connections began above board when she represented the company as a lawyer with the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock. She has since, for good reason, been called the queen of Monsanto, taking some $335,000 for just one speaking fee from a Monsanto front group.

Monsanto is tight with both the Democrat and Republican parties. When the US illegally invaded Iraq in 2004, part of the conditions of our “helping” that country rebuild was that Iraqi farmers plant only Monsanto’s GMO seeds, the kind with the pesticide engineered inside (so that you eat it), the kind the company prosecutes farmers for collecting and trying to replant.

U.S. Government forces Monsanto on Iraqis

Yes, the US Government and Monsanto dictated that in Mesopotamia, where man first tilled the soil thousands of years ago – and so presumably knew something about farming – Iraqi farmers could henceforth sew only GMO seed. They could use only Monsanto or other chemical and biotech business’ poison products; that was the condition for our  “help” in rebuilding the mess we made of their country. By any measure, this forcing them to farm only Monsanto crap is a war crime. The results have been predictably terrible in Iraq’s arid soil. Studies have long shown that GMO seeds need more water, not less, and more pesticide, not less, unlike the promotional brochures’ promise. For many decades, Iraq produced the finest produce in the Middle East, until Monsanto and its toxic glyphosate was forced on the decimated and shell-shocked population.

New World Order for Monsanto

For the Obama Liaruninitiated, this is how the New World Order works. It uses the US government to wage war, murder a country’s people and leaders, all in order to take their resources (oil, opium, shipping port access, what else you got?) and also make the country safe for Monsanto, Coca-Cola, United Fruit, and other international mega-business concerns. (Required Reading: General Smedley Butler’s War is a Racket).

The NWO uses our military to secure big paydays for military contractors, Monsanto, Big Pharma (it’s the liability-free vaccines, stupid), Wal-Mart and other giant business monsters. The NWO uses our military to do it all in the name of Democracy. It’s a very transparent, duplicitous ploy, and it shows no signs of slowing.

The dark punch line is that not one single country that our CIA and military have been used to destabilize has made a success of any sort of Democracy, which has always been the ruse we operate under. Not Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, The Phillippines, Grenada, Haiti, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Lybia, not one single country which we have invaded to “help” has been improved by our “help.”

Murder Inc. – coup d’états r us

In fact, the opposite is true. Since 1953 when CIA pulled its first major coup, orchestrating the overthrow of Iran’s leader and elected government, everything the CIA and US government has meddled in has turned out for the worse for that country. The 1953 Iranian coup d’état was the CIA-orchestrated overthrow of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. He had committed the unpardonable sin of imagining his oil should be owned by his people. He sought to audit the documents of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), a British corporation (now part of BP, which destroyed our Gulf Of Mexico forever, adding Corexit to finish the poisoning job) and to limit the company’s control over Iranian petroleum reserves. When AIOC refused to co-operate with the Iranian government, the parliament (Majlis) voted to nationalize Iran’s oil industry and expel foreign corporate representatives. That triggered a CIA-sponsored bloodbath.

U.S. Oil CIA Ties

Britain instigated a worldwide boycott of Iranian oil, while using Iranian agents to undermine Mosaddegh’s government. In August 2013, 60 years after, CIA finally admitted it was in charge of both the planning and the execution of the Iranian coup, including the bribing of Iranian politicians, security and army high-ranking officials, as well as pro-coup propaganda. The agency justifies it on its web site “as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.”

The CIA and US Government pulled a similar trick in 1954, this time with a democratically elected leader. The American version of Murder Inc. (Eh, Michael Hastings?) destroyed the government of Guatemala and orchestrated the murder (falsely ruled a suicide) of its leader, Jacobo Arbenz. The CIA even admits on its own web site that their role in this horror “came to be widely seen as shameful. (The) governments that followed the 1954 coup in the subsequent five decades were far more repressive than Arbenz’s elective government. Even intelligence scholar Christopher Andrew, an Eisenhower admirer, describes the Guatemala affair as a “’disreputable moment.’”

A Disreputable Moment
Hillary Clinton’s Monsanto association has been more than a disreputable moment, but hopefully her pro Monsanto stance takes some of the sting out of her defeat for democrats. If you care about our food supply, care about a government-connected company dictating what kind of food a nation can or cannot grow, her defeat is hopefully some sort of defeat for Monsanto. Maybe Trump will do something about the unconscionable way that FDA was steamrolled by Michael Taylor and other Monsanto-FDA turn-style turncoats who used their positions with FDA and their executive jobs with Monsanto to blur the lines between the fox and the henhouse.




Power Morcellator Investigation by Government

The U.S. Government morcellator uterine cancerAccountability Office (GAO) has still not issued any statement regarding its investigation into power morcellators used for hysterectomy or uterine fibroids. The GAO announced in Sept. 2015 that it would investigate controversy which had stemmed from wide use of power morcellators, and subsequent morcellator lawsuits. These gynecological devices are known to spread undetected cancers during hysterectomies and myomectomies.

Congressional Letter to GAO
The GAO’s action came after a dozen members of Congress wrote a letter requesting that the agency investigate. The legislators wrote the GAO a letter dated August 2, 2015:

“Hundreds, if not thousands, of women in America are dead because of a medical device known as a laparoscopic power morcellator. (This) device can take a Stage 1 treatable cancer immediately to a Stage 4 terminal cancer. For too many women, this routine procedure ended with a death sentence.”

The representatives’ letter was signed by Reps. Mike Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), Ralph Abraham (R-La.), Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), Bill Pascrell, Jr. (D-N.J.), Lou Barletta (R-Pa.), Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.), Anna G. Eshoo (D-Calif.), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), Chris Smith (R-N.J.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), and Rick Larsen (D-Wash.).

FDA Limits Morcellator Use
FDA severely limited power morcellator use in November 2014, a year after doctors and patient advocates Amy Reed and Hooman Noorchashm launched a vigorous campaign against the device.

Morcellator National Security Threat
Dr. Amy Reed became a power morcellator victim after one was used on her for a hysterectomy. Her husband, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm then became something of a whistleblower. He announced that morcellators were a national security threat, given that 1 in 350 women have undetected uterine cancer prior to hysterectomy or fibroid removal. When that woman with undetected cancer undergoes surgery with a morcellator, her cancer can be morcellated – sliced and diced – into millions of pieces which are then spread everywhere throughout the uterus. The result can be aggressive uterine cancer or other type of cancer that can be fatal.

Doctors push Back
Some doctors, meanwhile, have pushed back against the proposed morcellator ban. The morcellator offers the convenience of a less invasive procedure. Fewer sutures are needed in using the morcellator, compared with the old methods used for hysterectomy and myomectomy or fibroid removal. The problem remains, however, that the ovarian cancer testing which doctors have used prior to surgery in order to diagnose possible cancer has not proven reliable.

Morcellator Lawuits
Against this backdrop, morcellator lawsuits have been filed across the country for women with undetected cancer who then underwent surgery with a power morcellator, only to find that the machine spread and worsened their undetected cancer.

Power Morcellator Investigation by Government

Meanwhile, the power morcellator investigation by the U.S. government continues. Stay tuned for further developments. . .



Exploding Air Bag Lawsuit filed in Texas

A woman nearly Takata admits Airbags Defectivekilled by an exploding air bag in an otherwise minor traffic accident has filed a lawsuit against Takata and Honda. The petition seeks more than $1 million in damages.

Related: Air Bag Lawsuit Lawyer

The Takata air bag exploded Sept. 11, 2016, in the low-speed crash of a 2002 Honda Civic. The defective bag sent shards of metal into Serena Martinez, 42 in Fort Bend County, Texas. The shrapnel severely cut her chest and arm.

Ms. Martinez said she is lucky to be alive. The metal shards narrowly missed a major artery as they pierced her chest instead of her neck.

Related: Takata Air Bag Blinds Man

“I thought I was going to bleed to death,” said Ms. Martinez. “I don’t understand how something that was supposed to protect me (caused) my injuries.”

Exploding Takata Airbag

The air bag in the 2002 Civic was made by Takata Corp., a Japanese auto parts company that enjoys 30% of the world’s airbag market. Takata air bags are inflated by explosive ammonium nitrate in a metal canister. The problem can occur if the ammonium nitrate burns all at once. That occurrence can then blow the canister into metal shrapnel that can penetrate passengers and injure or kill them.

Exploding Airbag Deaths

Exploding Takata air bags are believed to be implicated in the deaths of at least 16 people, while more than 50 injuries have been reported, most of them in America. The potentially fatal aibag problem has triggered the largest safety recall in U.S. history – some 70 million airbag inflators sold by 15 automakers.

Humidity, Moisture Related Problems

Air bag injury lawyers allege that Takata has known for decades ammonium nitrate can be dangerously unstable, especially with moisture exposure. Most explosions have occurred in hot and humid regions in the U.S. By year 2019, regulators want Takata to recall all of its airbags which use ammonium nitrate with no drying agent.

Exploding Air Bag Lawsuit filed in Texas

Ms. Martinez lawsuit was filed October 31, 2016 in state district court in Houston, Texas.

Takata Air Bag Settlement in Houston

A confidential Hondasettlement was recently reached in a similar case. On March 31, 2016, 17-year-old Huma Hanif was killed in a 2002 Honda Civic near Houston. She rear-ended another auto in a low speed accident, but her Takata air bag exploded and sent metal shrapnel into her neck. Ms. Hanif died at the scene of that accident.



New Laser Technique removes IVC Filters

Despite thereIVC Filter Graphic being no evidence blood clot filters help the overall population, or that they increase mortality for trauma patients, some 250,000 IVC filters are implanted in people yearly. Even more concerning, many of these devices are not removed as soon as they should be. Research has meanwhile shown that the longer IVC filters remain in the body, the more likely they are to cause problems.  Fortunately, help may be on the way.

New Technology could save Lives

New technology is showing some promise, paving the way for the possible safe removal of IVC filters. New technology and methods could potentially save thousands of lives.

FDA recommends Quick IVC Filter Removal
Studies estimate that only 8% of IVC filters are removed from patients within 3.8 years of their being implanted. The FDA, meanwhile, recommends IVC filters be removed 24 to 59 days after being implanted.

The problem is that IVC filters aren’t always easy to remove, even within the recommended window; and the longer they remain implanted, the more difficult they can be to remove. IVC filters like those made by C.R. Bard, Cook Medical, and Cordis Corporation, have been named in blood clot filter lawsuits which allege they are prone to perforating the inferior vena cava wall. They can also migrate throughout the body and fracture, causing their parts to embed into vital organs. One client at Matthews & Associates Law Firm, which represents people who have filed IVC filter lawsuits, has an IVC filter embedded in a kidney. The entire kidney will likely need to be removed to safeguard the person’s life.

When an IVC filter fails within a person’s body, it can be extremely difficult to remove the device. Besides the kidneys, pieces can lodge in the heart or lungs,  and devices that have perforated the vena cava wall often can’t be removed without causing further damage.

Serious, Life-threatening Complications

IVC filters left inside one’s body can cause serious, life-threatening complications, including internal bleeding or strokes. Patients left with the defective devices may live in constant fear that the wrong movement could jar a jagged piece loose and cause fatal damage. Into this fearful scenario comes this hopeful news.

Five-Year Study shows Promise for Filter Removal

A five-year study examined the safety and efficacy of using advanced laser technology to remove previously irretrievable IVC filters. Endovascular laser-assisted retrieval has been applied to successfully remove several different types of IVC filters. Researchers who worked in the study believe that nearly all defective IVC filters can be removed using this laser technology.

New Laser Technique removes IVC Filters

More clinical studies need to be performed using this procedure, which for now appears able to give many thousands of people hope for a better, healthier future unencumbered by IVC filter fears.



5.0 Oklahoma Earthquake damages Buildings

Another OklahomaOK 5.0 Quake earthquake damaged homes and businesses Sunday. On November 6, 2016 at  7:44 CST, a quake measuring 5.0 on the Richter scale rattled central Oklahoma. The epicenter was near Cushing, some 50 miles northeast of Oklahoma City. The shock was felt as far away as Dallas, Kansas City and Little Rock, Ark.

Pictures of the damage were shown in social media; debris lay piled up at the base of commercial buildings.

Pipeline Crossroads of the World

Cushing (pop. 7,900) is home to the world’s largest oil storage facility, Cushing Tank Farms. The city calls itself the “Pipeline Crossroads of the World.”

Scientists have linked Oklahoma’s sharp uptick in earthquakes to underground disposal of wastewater from oil and gas production. In the process of fracking, millions of gallons of water and frack chemicals are pumped into the earth in order to fracture the shale rock far below and force out “natural” gas. That fracking fluid is then extracted and pumped deep into the earth at another location, which experts think is what triggers the quakes.

Oklahoma experienced roughly one or two earthquakes a year for some 100 years. That all changed in 2009 with the introduction of widespread fracking throughout the state. More than 50 earthquakes fractured the state that year and every year since. More than 300 quakes rattled the Sooner state in 2010.

Earthquake Lawsuits

Property owners who have seen their homes and businesses damaged by the quakes have begun to file earthquake lawsuits against the fracking companies they believe responsible for the damages.



Vaccine Agenda pushed by CBS

Nov. 7, 2016 —EyeLies The vaccine agenda is pushed by CBS. 60 Minutes viewers were treated last night to pro-vaccine propaganda from the old network. 60 Minutes ran a segment promoting the morally-challenged CDC and trumpeting the creation of a Zika vaccine to cure the wildly overhyped threat of Zika. CBS and the CDC also shill for Merck’s nightmare HPV vaccine Gardasil as well as the highly dubious shingles vaccine.

CBS Credibility Problems

CBS has had credibility problems at least since newsman Dan Rather lied to the entire nation. (CBS has since lied so much it’s hard to keep up.) On Nov. 25, 1963, Mr. Rather proclaimed to the whole country that he had seen the Abraham Zapruder film. He claimed the film demonstrated that John F. Kennedy’s head moved violently forward as he was shot from behind in Dallas.  Six years later, when the whole country had viewed the same film, everyone saw that Mr. Rather and CBS had lied. LIED. We all saw Mr. Kennedy’s head move violently backward with the final fatal shot.

Related: Birth Defects not caused by Zika

Film proves CBS Lies

That violent backward movement definitively proved that our President was shot at least once from the front, which in turn showed that there had been a probable conspiracy involving more than one shooter. The House Select Committee on Assassinations thus ruled that “John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.” (HSCA-1979)  CBS was thus outed as, at best, an untrustworthy news source, and, at worst, a shadow government disinformation puppet. In the words of old Latin: ‘Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus’ – False in one, false in all.

Research shows Zika not cause of Microcephaly

CBS continues its lying traditions with its Zika coverage. The lying eye network should at least research Zika virus history if it wishes to reclaim some semblance of credibility.  Amid the mad Zika hysteria put forth by CBS and other mainstream outlets shilling for Big Pharma’s vaccine “fixes,”  Brazilian doctors have quietly announced that the Zika virus, which has been around since at least 1947, is not solely and perhaps not even partly to blame for microcephaly, the small-headed baby syndrome.  Most of the women who have given birth to damaged babies lived in poverty stricken agricultural areas which use massive amounts of banned Monsanto pesticides. Most were also forcibly vaccinated while pregnant with a T-DAP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) vaccine. That mandated vaccination of pregnant women in northern Brazil that began in October 2014 perfectly paralleled the dramatic rise in microcephaly.  As insane as it may sound, the CDC also supports vaccinating pregnant women.

12,000 Zika cases in Pregnant women with no birth defects

According to a report from the New England Complex Systems Institute (NECSI), the very idea that Zika causes microcephaly is very much in doubt. The institute cites a New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) Study which followed nearly 12,000 Colombian women infected with the Zika virus. The data has shown no positive correlation between Zika and the small-headed baby birth defect.

An analysis revealed the rate of microcephaly to be what would be expected in any area, whether Zika is a factor or not, which is 2 cases in 10,000 births. According to NECSI:

“This gives a consistent interpretation that there is no direct link between Zika and microcephaly except for random co-occurrence.

We note that the base rate of microcephaly in the absence of Zika is 140 per year in Colombia, which is consistent with the approximately 50 microcephaly cases in the first [four] months of 2016, only [four] of which have been connected to Zika. When interpreting Zika as the cause, background cases must be subtracted.”

By June 2016, 11 total microcephaly cases had been reported in women with Zika infections in Colombia. If Zika and microcephaly are linked, NECSI pointed out that the total number of microcephaly cases should rise dramatically in the next few months, reaching more than 10 microcephaly-Zika births each week.

Poisoned Drinking Water

The government began poisoning Brazil’s water in an insane attempt to combat the overhyped threat of Zika, which may be increasing birth defects and continuing a vicious cycle that more vaccination could worsen.

NECSI also suggested, “An alternative cause of microcephaly in Brazil could be the pesticide pyriproxyfen, which is cross-reactive with retinoic acid, which causes microcephaly, and is being used in drinking water.”

Insane Naled Spraying

Meanwhile, Zika hysteria ginned up by CBS and other mainstream outlets has led to illegal spraying of the nerve toxin Naled in Miami and other areas of southeastern America. Miami residents are protesting their forced CDC poisoning. How soon before the CDC begins forcibly poisoning us all? We are all shrunken-headed babies now.

Vaccine Agenda pushed by CBS

Why the vaccine push? It’s the money, stupid. Vaccines make companies like Merck and others billions of dollars. People who work for the CDC often  move through the revolving door into “private practice.” Dr. Julie Gerberding went from director of CDC directly to president of Merck.  She merrily passed “Go” and made several millions more than the requisite $200. The CDC during her tenure had green-lighted several Merck products such as its dubious Gardasil and Zostovax shingles vaccines that have made the company billions.

Vaccines are the perfect business. They represent public risk for private profit; we take all the risks, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and other multi-national drug makers rake in all the profits. Vaccine makers are vaccinated by Congress against liability when their vaccines hurt or kill people, as they often do. Pay no attention to those flu vaccine deaths. Prepare for an avalanche of vaccine propaganda obscuring the real issues, such as the putrid CDC plan to remove our most basic human right of informed consent.



North Oklahoma Earthquake 4.5

A 4.5 magnitudePawnee Quakes earthquake that struck northern Oklahoma Nov. 1, 2016 may finally move OK lawmakers into considering restrictions on some oil and gas drillers shaking the state.  The endless quakes have led some residents to file Oklahoma earthquake lawsuits for property damage.

Oklahoma’s alarming increase in earthquakes since runaway fracking began in 2008 has some state lawmakers interested in the connection between fracking operations for “natural” gas and subsequent earthquake damage. Most oil and gas specialists not funded by Big Oil now believe that the injection of underground wastewater deep into the earth is the most likely culprit. Conventional oil drilling in Oklahoma for more than 100 years never resulted in the huge uptick in earthquakes that perfectly paralleled the introduction of new oil and gas fracking methods.

North Oklahoma Earthquake 4.5

Fortunately, no damage was reported from this week’s 4.5 magnitude earthquake. In September 2016, an Oklahoma record-setting 5.6 earthquake  spurred some residents into calling for change.

The Associated Press reported this week that Oklahoma Corporation Commission plans a response to the Nov. 1 earthquake. Some state regulators are considering new restrictions on oil and gas activity.

Pawnee Nation sues Frackers

The long-suffering Pawnee Nation, however, rattled by the latest quakes, is not waiting any longer for sensible treatment. In late October 2016, according to The The Stillwater Press, the Pawnees announced plans to sue four energy companies: New Dominion, Sandridge Exploration and Production, Chesapeake Operating, Devon Energy Production Company.

 Andrew Knife Chief told the Stillwater News Press that much of the problem stems from local government’s lack of power:

“The City of Pawnee can’t pass any kind of city resolution banning underground injection control wells within a certain distance of the city or whatnot,” Knife Chief said. He hopes, however, that the Pawnee Nation’s sovereign authority could help in a lawsuit.

“That same restriction doesn’t apply to us,” he said. “(On) Oct. 22 of 2015, the Pawnee Nation business council passed a resolution calling for a moratorium on fracking activities.”

While Oklahoma’s governor and most experts not on Big Oil’s payroll recognize a link between fracking and the huge increase of Oklahoma’s earthquakes, oil money continues to deny a connection between fracking and earthquakes.

Oklahoma Corporation Commission sees Frack Link

The Oklahoma Corporation Commission, meanwhile, has conceded: “Researchers largely agree that wastewater injection into the Arbuckle formation poses the largest potential risk for earthquakes in Oklahoma,” according to the group’s September Earthquake Response Summary.



Shingles Vaccine fails 98-99%

The shinglesZostovax vaccine fails 98-99% of the people targeted to take it. To arrive at that conclusion, one needs look only so far as the studies which Merck Pharmaceuticals trotted out for FDA when the shingles vaccine was approved in 2006.

Doctor sees Shingles Vaccine Fails

Dr. David Brownstein set out to do what most doctors should do before prescribing a vaccine to their patients. He worked to discover whether the shingles vaccine made sense for them to take. Rather than simply scan Merck’s shiny promotional brochures or peruse slick shingles vaccine television commercials (along with the rest of us), Dr. Brownstein performed a bit of cursory research, apparently a novel concept for many doctors. Novel, at least, for those who push the shingles vaccine.

Do I need the shingles vaccine?

Dr. Brownstein then wrote a letter to the American Family Physician Journal. He explained to the editor that the question, “Do I need the shingles vaccine?” was one of the most common in his practice. He wrote the letter to help others decide whether the shingles shot was a good idea.

Pity that Dr. Brownstein’s letter went unpublished by the Journal. Every doctor in the country should be made to read it. Dr. Brownstein’s letter reviewed the shingles vaccine article: Prevention of Herpes Zoster in Older Adults, by Jared Kocher, published November 1, 2016. Mr. Kocher summarized the Cochrane Review as such, “The herpes zoster (shingles) vaccine has demonstrated effectiveness in preventing shingles in older adults.”

Related: Natural Foods may help treat Shingles.

Shingles Vaccine helps 1 in 50 People

Author Kocher stated that 50 people aged 60-69 had to be vaccinated in order to prevent one case of shingles. For those over 70, 100 had to be vaccinated in order to help just one person. Therefore, the numbers show that the shingles vaccine is ineffective for 98 of 100 people aged 60-69, and ineffective for 99/100 in those over 70, because 99 of 100 received no benefit.

“I am incredulous that anyone looking at this data could proclaim that the shingles vaccine was effective,” wrote Dr. Brownstein. “In fact, it wasn’t. According to the data, the shingles vaccine was a 98-99% failure.”

At $200 per shot, 50 people aged 60-69 would have to be vaccinated to prevent two cases of shingles, at a cost of $10,000 per case. For those over 70, 100 would need to be vaccinated to prevent one case of shingles, at a cost of $20,000. “Clearly, this vaccine is not cost effective in these tough economic times,” wrote Dr. Brownstein.

Author Kocher also summarized the adverse effect risk of the vaccine. For every 2.8 vaccines given, one person was harmed. In addition, for every one hundred people vaccinated, one had a severe adverse reaction such as rash, fever and/or hospitalization.

Beyond all sense of reason, Mr. Kocher nevertheless concludes the shingles vaccine is “safe, effective and well tolerated. . .”  One needs to ask Mr. Kocher, “For whom?” The one person in 50 that it may work for?

Shingles Vaccine fails 98-99%

One would need to be mentally challenged not to see the conclusion Dr. Brownstein draws, that any conclusion regarding the subject should read that “the herpes zoster (Shingles) shingles vaccine is neither safe, effective, nor well tolerated.”



Talc Powder causes Cancer, says Jury

Talc powder JJ-TALCcauses cancer, said a jury in St. Louis on October 27, 2016. The jury ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay a California woman more than $70 million, after ruling that Johnson’s baby powder caused her ovarian cancer. It was the fourth time a jury has agreed with the plaintiff’s argument that talc used for feminine hygiene can cause ovarian cancer, and also agreed that it caused the cancer of the woman who brought a lawsuit.

Johnson accused of Negligent Conduct

This trial that began Sept. 26 was brought by Deborah Giannecchini of Modesto, California. Ms. Giannecchini was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2012. Her lawsuit accused Johnson & Johnson of “negligent conduct” in making and marketing its baby powder.

Johnson loses all four Talc-Cancer Jury Verdicts

“Four juries have now ruled that Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder can cause cancer,” said attorney David Matthews, whose firm handles J&J talc cancer lawsuits. “How many more huge verdicts will it take before the company fairly settles these cases?”

Related: Cancer Risks hidden, Jury told

J&J says Talc Powder Safe

In a statement provided to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, J&J spokeswoman Carol Goodrich said the company sympathizes with women and families impacted by ovarian cancer, but added, “We will appeal today’s verdict because we are guided by the science, which supports the safety of Johnson’s Baby Powder.”

Two earlier talc cancer trials in St. Louis rendered a combined $127 million in verdicts against J&J. In New Jersey, however, two recent talc-cancer lawsuits were unilaterally dismissed by a judge who didn’t want a jury to hear the case. Judge Johnson (with a name to add irony to insult) ruled that no reliable evidence exists to link talc to ovarian cancer. This potentially deadly form of cancer accounts for some 22,000 of the 1.7 million new cancer cases expected to be diagnosed in the U.S. this year, according to the Post Dispatch.

2,000 Talc Cancer Lawsuits

Some 2,000 women have filed similar talc-cancer lawsuits. Matthews & Associates and other law firms are reviewing thousands of other potential cases.

Company-sponsored research has found no link or only a weak link among women who use talcum powder for feminine hygiene and then develop ovarian cancer. Some health groups have declared talc harmless.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys, however, have shown juries research evidence which began linking talcum powder to ovarian cancer back in the 1970s. Case studies have indicated that women who regularly use talc for feminine hygiene can face up to a 40 percent increased risk of developing ovarian cancer.

Plaintiffs have also accused Johnson & Johnson of targeting overweight, Black and Hispanic women for talc sales – women who are already at highest risk for ovarian cancer.  Plaintiffs have presented trial evidence showing this to be the case.

Ovarian Cancer Risk Factors
Factors known to increase a woman’s risk of developing ovarian cancer include age, obesity, estrogen therapy, not bearing children, genetic mutations, and a personal or family history of cancer; though recent research has shown that cancer is not usually linked to genetic dispositions.

Possibly Carcinogenic – IARC

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies feminine hygiene use of talc as “possibly carcinogenic.” The National Toxicology Program, made up of segments of several different government agencies, has not fully reviewed talc, according to the Post Dispatch.

Talc Overview
Talc is a mineral mined from deposits around the world. The soft mineral is crushed into white powder and used in cosmetics and other personal care products to absorb moisture. J&J began using it circa 1894, when it launched its J&J Baby Powder. Talc is also used in many other products, which include paints and plastics.



Natural Immunity Superior to Vaccination

Though some Mercury Safetymedical textbooks funded by Big Pharma donations may claim natural immunity is no different from artificial immunity, the fact is simple and clear: natural immunity is far superior to any artificial immunity allegedly given by “vaccination.”

Alleged Vaccinations

Allegedly is the adverb we want. It is perfectly fair to ask whether some vaccines work at all, or whether they are worth their risks, such as the shingles vaccine. Or the oral polio vaccine, which its inventor Jonas Salk testified in 1976 was the “principal if not sole cause” of all reported polio cases in the U.S. since 1961. The CDC admitted the same thing in 1992.

Natural Immunity

Naturally acquired immunity is magnificent, multifaceted, mysterious –  scientists are still learning about it today. We are born with natural immunity, a gift conferred upon us by our maker. It works GREAT, if we are kept healthy, well fed, and given clean water to help purge our bodies of the sins of our toxic “environment” overrun with corporate polluters and poisoned GMO foods.

Our immune response is a complex interaction between molecules, cells, and organs. It is efficient. It is able to protect us from outside threats as well as internal cells.

Non-specific vs. Specific Immunity

Our immune system can be classified into two parts: non-specific (innate, immediate response) and specific (acquired or antigen specific). These complex parts are constantly communicating and interacting, as is our entire immune system.

When we attain an infection naturally, the virus/bacteria/fungus must penetrate physical barriers (skin), chemicals factors (nasal secretions/membranes, saliva), biological features (gastrointestinal tract flora).

The non-specific components of immunity make up most of our immune resistance systems. Back in the 1980’s, a team at Paris’ Pasteur Institute showed 98% of the immune response triggered at the early stages of infection is non-specific. (Nature Medicine, April 2000)

Specific Immunity – Vaccine Induced

An injectable vaccine bypasses these barriers. In this direct bloodline assault, none of the body’s cells, organs or molecules – which are part and parcel of the body’s primary non-specific response – is activated.

Bad Science

The whole theory of vaccination is arguably erected on an edifice of flawed science. Vaccination is based on the premise (and the superstition, because nothing proves vaccination theory as fact) that we can “trick” our bodies into becoming immune to a disease without suffering any consequences.

The non-specific defense system, the body’s best, developed through thousands of years of evolution, responds immediately to protect the body from all foreign substances, whatever they may be. The non-specific system reduces the workload of the specific defense system by preventing the entry and spread of micro-organisms throughout the entire body. (Essentials of Anatomy and Physiology)

What is Immunity?

Immunity means the protection against infectious disease by either specific or non-specific mechanisms. The word immunity pertains to the immune system or immune response, according to Dorland’s Medical Dictionary.

Direct to Bloodstream Entry

Vaccines are injected directly into muscles, directly into the human bloodstream. This unnatural toxic assault bypasses the body’s natural defense. Pathogens most naturally enter through the mouth or nose, both of which are heavily lined with mucous membranes, packed with IgA, which is the key defender against viral infections. (Essentials of Medicine)

In the triggering of natural immunity, a remarkable number of biological events occur which prompt the body’s miraculous ability to develop true immunity. All of this occurs before the virus or bacteria comes in contact with the person’s bloodstream.  And all of this is bi-passed, short-circuited by vaccination.

Antibody Production does NOT mean Protection

The sole intent of a vaccine is to elicit an antibody reaction. Vaccine makers and their doctor cheerleaders claim the vaccine is “effective” when antibodies are identified in the bloodstream. But antibodies’ presence in the bloodstream has absolutely no correlation to immunity, as witnessed by the fact that the flu shot can give one the flu (as unwittingly proven to millions of people on national television by Dr. Oz and Piers Morgan), and the shingles vaccine can give someone shingles, as proven by the warning label the FDA required Merck to include on its Zostovax shingles vaccine. There is zero proof that elevated antibody titers confer immunity or protection from disease.

Natural Immunity Superior to Artificial Immunity of Vaccination

You read that right: No proof exists anywhere to show a link between antibody count and disease incidence. Researchers have found highly resistant people with extremely low antibody counts, as well as people who developed the disease to which they had high antibody counts.

Dr. Alec Burton discovered that children born with a-gamma globulinemia (inability to produce antibodies) develop and recover from measles and other infectious or contagious disease almost as quickly as other children. (Dr. Alec Burton, published by the British Medical Council)

Life-Long Immunity, a Memory

One of the fundamental features of the immune system is its ability to respond and remember an invading virus or bacteria.

A problem occurs here with the use of vaccines because T cells (memory cells) are extremely slow learners. The most recent research shows that the ability for a T cell to remember requires many encounters instead of one initial exposure.

“It is true that natural infection almost always causes better immunity than vaccines. Whereas immunity from disease often follows a single, natural infection, immunity from vaccines occurs only after several doses.” (Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia)

“The antigens contained in many injectable vaccines will not produce an immune response sufficient enough to confer protection against infection. Of the 23 vaccines currently in routine use, 20 are delivered by injection and stimulate only systemic immunity.”  (Avant Immunotherapeutics)

“It is dangerously misleading and indeed the exact opposite of the truth to claim that a vaccine makes us “immune’ or protects us against an acute disease, if in fact it only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically, with the result that our responses to it become progressively weaker and show less and less tendency to heal or resolve themselves spontaneously.” Dr. Robert Moskowitz, Dissent in Medicine)

Vaccines Inferior to Nutrition, Rest,  Sanitation

Vaccines are promoted by Big Pharma, the CDC, the AMA and an alphabet soup of government entities tethered to Big Pharma funds. Nutrition, rest, proper sanitation and clean water are far more important for anyone wishing to remain healthy in the continuing onslaught that poisons our air, food, water and social and political climates.