WebMD shills for Monsanto & Big Pharma

WebMD shills for Monsanto, Big Pharma, and other corporate giants.  Natural News has revealed how WebMD has never seen a Monsanto product or a Big Pharma drug or vaccination that it didn’t like.  It promotes them all, without question or critical comment.  Why?

It’s the Advertising Money, Stupid
WebMD takes most of its advertising money from Big Pharma corporations like Merck, maker of the dubious shingles vaccine, the dangerous MMR vaccine, and other troublesome vaccines that are far from as safe or as effective as advertised by Merck and WebMD.  The company known as WebMD is one that clearly knows which industry giants are paying its bills.  WebMD is, in point of fact, little more than a tireless promoter of not only Big Pharma drugs and ethically-challenged Monsanto, but any and all vaccination, regardless of real science (or lack thereof) or circumstances.

Related:  Five Most Dangerous Vaccines

Passive GMO Promotion
Corporate sponsorships taint WebMD’s recommendations and “passive” promotion techniques. WebMD advertisements are often designed to look more like editorials to disguise their real intent, fooling readers into thinking that the advertising they see is actually news of some sort.

Monsanto WebMD Partnership
Monsanto uses WebMD’s influence to serve its own agenda.  Monsanto produces several sponsored “advertorials” that can easily be mistaken for “real” content rather than marketing propaganda.  Monsanto also uses independent third parties to manipulate GMO content on WebMD’s web site. (Monsanto also colludes with the EPA to play down the dangers of Roundup and promote it.)

Web MD Internet’s Most Visited Health Site
WebMD is, unfortunately for the truth, the internet’s most visited health site.  Public perception is that it’s a trustworthy source of “independent and objective” health information.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  WebMD is a thinly-disguised corporate shill masquerading as a news site.  WebMD uses its influence to shamelessly promote corporate-backed health products and protocols.

WebMD’s Journalistic Subterfuge destroys Credibility
WebMD “Partnerships” destroy any credibility the site may have once had.  Partnerships and sponsorships infect WebMD’s recommendations across the board. “Passive” promotion techniques include advertisements designed to look like editorials.  This is journalistic subterfuge at its worst, and its most sophisticated.

Web MD Rigs Phony Test for Depression
The pharmaceutical drug industry’s capture of WebMD has been clear for a long while and is nearly complete.  In just one egregious example, Dr. Mercola has reported how WebMD’s free online depression test in 2010 was rigged to make any person responding feel like she needed professional help.  The only result a test respondent could receive was that she was at risk for major depression and should discuss her options with a doctor.

That phony “test” was sponsored by Cymbalta maker Eli Lilly.  The test’s intent was obvious – to make a person inquire about antidepressants, and hopefully start taking them, preferably forever.

This advertisement dressed up as a “consumer aid” to make people go from feeling normal to depressed caught the attention of Senator Charles Grassley.  He launched an investigation, but that announcement changed no laws and apparently no perceptions.  WebMD continues to hide advertising business as usual.  Consumer Beware!

Web MD Aids Monsanto
Monsanto is one of the latest multinational corporate giants to use WebMD for its own hidden agenda.  Nearly every WebMD article now includes a Monsanto-sponsored ad that boldly declares: “It’s time for a bigger discussion about food.”  This clever propaganda then links to Monsanto’s corporate take on soil, water, and honey bee-disappearance, with no other contributor’s point of view allowed.

Marketing Strategists Tout “Advertorial Sponsorships”
Marketing strategists say “advertorial sponsorships” are the best way to sell something today.  They are designed to fool consumers, so that they don’t realize they’re being sold something.

Back in the day, before deep-pocketed advertisers called the shots and completely ruled the publishing world, the line between editorial and advertising content was clear.  You knew whether you were reading an advertisement or an editorial.  Today, readers practically need degrees in journalism and science to know what they’re reading, who sponsored it, and why.

A business has to pay for a sponsorship/advertorial just like it would a regular ad.  In some cases, businesses pay significantly more than they would for a regular ad.  But corporations consider the expense of a sponsorship/advertorial ad well worth the cost.

As Dr. Mercola explains: “The venue where your sponsored advertorial is going (in this case, WebMD and its affiliates) has no input on the content – the advertiser has full control over the text of the ‘informative’ ad.  The advertiser can control how the information is presented on the page, as opposed to having to select a regular display ad format.”

The sponsored advertorial can be used in multiple publications.  Companies can reuse a sponsored advertorial as a stand-alone ad in other places.

Native Advertising’ further Blurs the Line Between Ads and Independent Content

Another form of this type of shrouded sales presentation is called “native advertising.” The key difference between a native ad and an advertorial is that a native ad fits more seamlessly into the Website which features it, making it even less noticeable as a sales pitch.

This sneaky ad is designed to make you think you’re reading a regular content article, when in fact it’s all marketing. In the case of WebMD, the advertorial/native ad line is so thin as to be non-existent. Many of WebMD’s disclaimers are barely noticeable, and rendered in a typeset which manipulates readers into skipping them entirely.

Dr. Mercola explains:  “This all amounts to massive collusion on the part of the industries partnering with WebMD to sell THEIR health goals and products without you realizing you’ve been sold something that may or may not be in your best interest at all.”

WebMD pushes Vaccination

When it comes to vaccination, WebMD publishes only those articles which make it seem as if vaccination is a tried and true science without enormous problems, which include lawsuits for dubious vaccines like Merck’s Zostavax.  Vaccination “science” is far from settled, but you wouldn’t know that if you read only WebMD’s narow take on the subject.  The same goes for Monsanto products, and Big Pharma drugs.

WebMD shills for Monsanto & Big Pharma

If you want to find out what is really going on in the world of GMO foods, Big Pharma drugs, and vaccination safety and efficacy, the best thing you could do is avoid WebMD.  You will find little truth there not colored by WebMD’s fealty to its corporate and government sponsors.  Selah!

RELATED

Share

Shingles Vaccine Risk Benefit Analysis

Are the advertised benefits of the shingles vaccine worth the risks? Merck’s own paid-for studies show those who receive the shingles vaccine may have, at best, a 50-50 chance of avoiding shingles. Therefore, whether the vaccine can help someone is a coin flip at best. (Please keep in mind that nobody is arguing that shingles is not a potential problem. Everyone agrees on that point.) Meanwhile, Merck’s Zostavax vaccine has caused thousands of people serious “side effects.”

Shingles Vaccine Side Effects
Problems from the shingles vaccine include shingles itself, with its debilitating nerve pain (postherpetic neuralgia) and eye damage that can involve potential blindness. Many shingles vaccine lawsuits have been filed for people who were vaccinated and then developed shingles a short time afterwards. Thousands of adverse events have been reported from people who have risked taking the vaccine.

Does Zostavax prevent shingles?
Not only does Merck’s shingles vaccine provide scant protection (if any) against one’s having a shingles outbreak, it may cause problems as bad or worse than shingles itself. More than 31,000 adverse effects from Zostavax have been reported to VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It is a well accepted fact that just one to ten percent (1-10%) of adverse reactions are reported for bad drug reactions. Consequently, it is not a stretch to estimate that more than 310,000 people have likely suffered adverse events from the shingles vaccine.

300,000 Adverse Reactions to Shingles Vaccine
Anyone considering Zostavax should take some time to read a few of these horrific reactions to the shingles vaccine.

Costly Chances, Serious Adverse Events
Seniors are the primary target for the shingles vaccine. Those on Medicare expect Medicare Part D will pay for it. But if the deductible has not been met, Zostavax’ full cost plus the fee for it can range from $190 to more than$350. The patient may need to pay it all.

A review article on herpes zoster, published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) generated a comment by Roy Fried, MD. MHS regarding the number of serious adverse events (AE) after the shingles vaccine:

For persons over 60, there is a 36% increase incidence of serious adverse events (AEs) within the first 42 days when data from and FDA safety study was combined with data from the Shingles Prevention Study.

For persons over 80, Zostavax’ ability to prevent shingles or postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) was no better than placebo AND these seniors had nearly double the rate of serious AEs in the first 42 days after their vaccination.

Vaccination fails to Lessen Pain of Outbreak
Big Pharma’s highly lucrative vaccine industry always assisted by the CDC frequently promotes the idea that even if a vaccine fails to keep one from getting sick, one will have a “less severe case.” A most dubious claim with every vaccination, it is a patently false claim with Zostavax. The FDA reported that shingles-vaccinated people who still developed shingles suffered severity of pain at the same level as that experienced by unvaccinated people who contracted shingles. In addition, the vaccinated group reported experiencing pain for just two days less than the pain reported by the unvaccinated (20 days vs. 22 days).

Shingles Shot Ingredients
The shingles shot was recently found contaminated with carcinogenic glyphosate, though that is not declared on the label. This makes one wonder what else is not declared in the ingredients. What is contained is alarming enough, including porcine gelatin, MSG, and aborted fetal cells.

The Shingles shot contains:

Viral Particles: At least 19,400 PFU (plaque forming units) – 14 times more viral particles than in the chickenpox vaccine.

Animal cells:
•  Pig: porcine gelatin – 15.58mg – known to cause anaphylaxis and food allergies
•  Cow: bovine serum – known to cause anaphylaxis and food allergies
•  Aborted Human cells: MRC-5 cells
•  Antibiotic: Neomycin
•  Chemical: sodium chloride (table salt) – 4.0 mg
•  Chemical: MSG, 0.62mg
•  Chemical: sodium phosphate dibasic, 0.57mg
•  Chemical: potassium phosphate monobasic, 0.10mg
•  Chemical: potassium chloride, 0.10 mg
•  Chemical: sucrose, 31.16 mg

RELATED

Share

Five Most Dangerous Vaccines

Vaccines are, unfortunately, not as safe as advertised. More than $3 billion in injury compensation and legal fees have been paid by the U.S. government for vaccine injuries from 1989 – 2015. That money has gone to the parents of children killed by vaccines, or for lifetime care needed for vaccine-injured children. It has also gone to lawyers who have been brave enough to face a so-called “vaccine court” decidedly stacked against people injured or killed by vaccines. (Read further for the five most dangerous vaccines.)

Secret Vaccine Court

The secret vaccine court allows no legal Discovery, no chance for plaintiffs to compare a vaccinated group with an unvaccinated one. That gold-standard exercise in safety and efficacy would decidedly prove which group is healthier and which is more likely to suffer disease or death. A control group comparison would show the real dangers and the failure of vaccination to perform as advertised. Mass vaccination promoted by the CDC, and billions of dollars in vaccine profits made by Merck Pharmaceuticals –  which makes the MMR and the highly dubious shingles vaccine – would be gravely threatened in the face of scientific evidence. No vaccine has ever been shown to be safe and effective in any legitimate epidemiological analysis. Robert Kennedy and Robert De Niro just offered a $100,000 reward to anyone who can prove any vaccine safe.

Five Most Dangerous Vaccines

All vaccinations come with potentially grave risks – especially for the 98 million Americans shot with SV40, a live cancer virus that the CDC fears has contributed to the current cancer epidemic. The CDC fears it enough to have removed that information from its web site. Just because someone doesn’t drop dead after “vaccination” doesn’t mean she hasn’t been harmed, yet. (See Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm )

Though all vaccines produce harm, some vaccines have been reported to be more harmful than others. Here are the top five most dangerous vaccines by filed injury reports as of 2015. Multiply each of these by at least a factor of ten. The CDC acknowledges, and it is common knowledge, that less than 10% of these types of injuries get reported, especially when potential reporters are well aware of the hostility the vaccine court holds toward claimants:

  1. DTP – 3,982 Complaints, 696 Deaths
  2. Influenza (Flu) – 1,788 Complaints
  3. MMR – 947 Complaints
  4. Hepatitis B – 672 Complaints
  5. DtaP – 454 Complaints

Only 1,270 of the DTP cases were awarded compensation. Only 985 flu cases received compensation. The so-called “vaccine court” is entirely unaccountable, set up outside our legal system. No jury ever gets to hear the very limited evidence plaintiffs are allowed to present.

Flu Shots Loaded with Toxic Poisons

Most of the flu vaccine formulations on the market contain  toxic ingredients: squalene-based adjuvants (linked with Gulf War Syndrome), formaldehyde, monosodium glutamate, thimerosal. Thimerosal (containing mercury) is used both as a preservative and a processing agent in several vaccines, according to the FDA. The FDA itself admits that some vaccines contain up to 24.5 micrograms of mercury per 0.5 milliliter dose.

While world health authorities claim thimerosal is not harmful, that claim is ludicrous.  The World Health Organization acknowledges that studies of infant macaques monkeys and rats have found that there is indeed evidence of harm caused by clinically relevant amounts of thimerosal.  As the WHO summarizes, “preliminary evidence of behavioral neurotoxicity in infant macaques following a single dose of HBV containing a clinically relevant dose of thimerosal on day of birth.”

The same document also states “Half-life of ethylmercury in blood has been shown to be similar in human and macaque infants.” (Connect the dots, anyone?) Yet, this evidence is dismissed because of “limitations” that necessitate replication, according to the WHO. The CDC has openly admitted before Congress that they never have evaluated the toxicity of mercury in vaccines. How can it be that known neurotoxinis taint vaccinations which are increasingly forced on the public?

Thimerosal is just one of many troubling vaccine ingredients. Aluminum salts are also often used to help “stoke” the immune system into action. Aluminum is a known neurotoxic metal. It is linked with Alzheimer’s and dementia and other neurological diseases. Is a little mercury or aluminum good for us? The answer is a resounding NO; but people get right in line for their shots and continue to poison their children with them.

The society and its people are harmed by vaccinations everyday in both incremental and sometimes catastrophic ways. One would do well to study some history of vaccination to see where we’ve come from to help determine where we are headed with forced vaccination.

RELATED

Share

Vaccines Ineffective, Unsafe – 2017 Study

Vaccines are ineffective and unsafe, according to the latest research. The vaccine hoax has just been unveiled by a rigorous scientific study. Completed in May 2017, the study found NO reduction in measles, mumps, rubella, influenza or rotavirus among vaccinated children. The same study of 650 kids also found the vaccinated to be less healthy than the unvaccinated. This study’s results are also consistent with recent meta-analysis of the shingles vaccination for adults. Like the other so-called “vaccines,” Merck’s Zostavax also fails to provide any level of protection which might justify or offset its considerable “side effects.”

Study shows Vaccines may cause diseases

The study was published in the Journal of Translational Science by epidemiologists from the School of Public Health at Jackson State University. In addition to finding no disease reductions among vaccinated children, the scientists — led by renowned epidemiologist Dr. Anthony Mawson — concluded that vaccines may be the culprit in the dramatic rise of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) and chronic illnesses such as allergies, autism, ADHD.

Vaccinated Kids trade possible outcomes for guaranteed illnesses

The Jackson State scientists analyzed data from Homeschool organizations in four states. They compared the incidence of a broad range of diseases in more than 650 children, 39 percent of whom were unvaccinated.

Vaccines Ineffective, Unsafe – 2017 Study

Vaccinated kids had an increased risk of autism (4.2 times), ADHD (4.2 times), learning disabilities (5.2 times), eczema (2.9 times), and allergic rhinitis (30 times). The vaccinated did have a lower likelihood of two (apparently) vaccine-preventable illnesses (chicken pox and pertussis); however, researchers found NO reduction of other (potentially) vaccine-preventable illnesses such as hepatitis A or B, measles, mumps, rubella, influenza, meningitis, or rotavirus.

Furthermore, the researchers noted that preterm birth itself is not associated with NDDs. When preterm birth is combined with vaccination, however, they found a 6.6-fold increased risk of NDDs. The study authors note that fully vaccinated children may be trading the prevention of certain acute illnesses (chicken pox and pertussis) for chronic illnesses and NDDs such as ADHD and autism.

CDC Fails to Act

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., writing for the World Mercury Project, explained that despite the numerous requests from parents and vaccine safety advocates for  honest research regarding vaccines, the U.S. CDC has failed to act. The Jackson State scientists are therefore calling for more trustworthy scientific studies to help explain and clarify their findings.

Dr. Mawson’s findings terrify the wildly profitable vaccine industry, so vicious push back will come from mainstream media minions for Big Pharma and CDC policy. Shortly after the publication, Dr. Mawson’s study was targeted by so-called ‘Retraction Watch’ — an industry-backed disinformation outlet — to keep the study out of the eye of the public, according to GreenMedInfo. Retraction Watch is an online blog for the Center for Scientific Integrity, which receives funding from The MacArthur Foundation and other pro-business operations.

MMR Vaccine Disinformation Campaign

The MMR – measles, mumps, and rubella – vaccine controversy began with the 1998 publication of a research paper in the medical journal The Lancet. A British gastroenterologist, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, and his team found that virtually all of the autistic children in their care were suffering from inflammatory bowel disease. Dr. Wakefield did not claim then, nor has he ever, that there was a link between the MMR vaccine and autism. What he did say was that his study suggested more research should be done on a possible link. He was widely misquoted and discredited in the mainstream press (controlled by vaccine profiteers) as claiming that there was a vaccine-autism link (There is such a link, as the latest study again shows, though Dr. Wakefield never said so). His book “Callous Disregard” covers the autism cases and his press lynching. Dr. Wakefield filed a lawsuit for defamation against a hack British journalist and a newspaper that led the charge to misrepresent, misquote, and destroy him in order to discredit his research. He has been entirely exonerated along with his fellow researcher Dr. John Walker Smith.

Vaccine Profits Drive Mainstream Coverage

Dr. Wakefield is, of course, far from alone, as the billion-dollar profits of “vaccination” forever drive mainstream press coverage on the subject. Virtually every mainstream press outlet promotes mass vaccination with disease-outbreak scare stories and other tactics, while attacking anyone who questions the party line.

Anti-Vaxxer Buzz Word promotes Vaccination Superstition

“Anti-vaxxer” is the preferred buzz word meant to dismiss scientific arguments against vaccination superstition. This rhetorical fallacy (name calling) works just as “conspiracy theorist” has since it was introduced in a secret CIA memo. In 1967, the agency instructed its media shills to tattoo that term onto critics of the ludicrous findings of the Warren Commission. These tiresome terms are always employed in an attempt to humiliate people and silence meaningful dissent and discussion. They are employed to destroy civil discourse and critical thinking. Name calling is only a rank schoolyard bully ploy that should only work on one with the mind of a tapeworm. It doesn’t work on you, does it?

RELATED

 

Share

Vaccines All Contaminated with Cancer-Causing Toxins – New Study

Vaccines are all contaminated with cancer-causing, immune-system-wrecking toxins not disclosed on the labels. That is the finding of a new study released in May 2017.  No future discussion of vaccination – forced or otherwise – can be conducted without first addressing this alarming, glaring problem. How can vaccinations be “safe and effective” if they give you cancer or autoimmune disease? (One is reminded of the American Major who explained his methods in Vietnam: “We had to destroy the village in order to save it.”  Vaccine makers destroy the child in order to save it.)

Editor’s Note re: Fake Vaccine News
Drug companies that make vaccines spend $5 billion a year on advertising, so you won’t see this story in mainstream “news.” You will, of course, see nationwide coverage of the next measles “outbreak” to help sell vaccination. Those in the business of selling “news” call this “complementary copy.” News outlets create “news” that complements (helps sell) the advertiser’s products. Stories like this one that threaten product sales are strictly verboten, or banished to the back pages. Mainstream media would not be the moneymaker it is otherwise.

Vaccines All Contaminated with Cancer-Causing Toxins – New Study
The new study found that every human vaccine tested was contaminated with unsafe levels of metals and debris linked to cancer and autoimmune disease. It was published May 2017 in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination. The research was led by Antonietta Gatti of the National Council of Research of Italy and the Scientific Director of Nanodiagnostics. Researchers examined 44 samples of 30 different vaccines. They found that all the human vaccines tested showed “the presence of micro- and nano-sized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccine samples” not declared in the vaccine’s ingredients’ lists. One vaccine for cats was the only one tested that was relatively clean.

Dangerous Contaminants Not Disclosed
Researchers found lead particles in a flu vaccine, in Gardasil and Cervarix (cervical cancer vaccines), and in a meningitis C vaccine.

An infant vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and haemophilus influenzae type B was found to contain undeclared stainless steel, tungsten, and a gold-zinc aggregate. Made by GlaxoSmithKline, the infant “vaccine” is called Infarix Hexa.

Metal Contaminants Undisclosed
Writer Celeste McGovern reported other metal contaminants included platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, chromium. She wrote that, “Chromium (alone or in alloy with iron and nickel) was found in 25 of the human vaccines from Italy and France. (If you think vaccines are “cleaner” in the U.S., think again. Many U.S. vaccines are made in China and elsewhere with little to no CDC oversight. Monsanto’s carcinogenic glyphosate has been found in vaccines here.)

Leukemia-Causing Vaccine?
GSK’s Fluarix vaccine for children three years and older contained 11 metals and aggregates of metals. Similar aggregates to those identified in the vaccines have been shown to be prevalent in cases of leukemia, the researchers noted.

Many of the vaccines contained iron and iron alloys which, the researchers wrote, “can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues.”

Undesirable Elements Impact Children
The study shows how these foreign contaminants injected into children may explain a litany of apparently unrelated adverse events associated with vaccination. These contaminants may explain everything from headaches and seizures to fatigue, muscle pain, paralysis and sudden infant death syndrome. More likely than not, the researchers surmise, vaccine contaminants will “have a more serious impact on very small organisms like those of children.”

The Dark History of Vaccination
The CDC has admitted to injecting a live cancer virus into 98 million Americans. That virus, SV40, was just one of 40 viruses identified in a polio vaccine that may have been a primary culprit in the epidemic of cancer that has exploded upon us since. Any adults considering the latest advertised vaccination for themselves – like the shingles vaccine – might first be wise to do some research regarding the dark history of vaccination. The life you save may be your own, or your child’s.

RELATED
•   Dirty Vaccines: New Study Reveals Contaminants
•   Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit
•   Vaccine Hysteria Reigns
•   Vaccines All Contaminated with Cancer-Causing Toxins – New Study

Share

Vaccine Injured Families receive Billions from Secret Court

Vaccine injured families have received billions of dollars from a Secret Court. The U.S. government has quietly paid, in the last 30 years, more than $3 billion to vaccine-injured children and their families. So far in 20017, the government has paid $142 million to 337 vaccine-injured families. All had filed claims with the so-called Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VCIP). Have you heard anything of these payments from the mainstream media?

Related: Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit

Pro-Vaxxers vs. Anti-Vaxxers
Why do we hear only stories of so-called measles “outbreaks” and the dangers of “anti-vaxxers”? Why are people attacked by their neighbors or “bloggers” (many hired by Big Pharma) who think they have the right to decide whether or not to subject themselves and their children to the wonders of vaccination? Why is there never any sort of balanced discussion in the mainstream media of the history, safety, and efficacy record of vaccination?

Parents vs. Parents
Why are loving parents pitted against loving parents? Why does our society seem incapable of rational discussion regarding vaccination? Is there some sort of plan to turn this subject into an emotional quagmire that leaves people unwilling to examine the real science of vaccination? Who would it benefit to turn parent against parent? Who does it benefit to enlist pro-vaxxer parents or professional bloggers to bully, intimidate or attack anti-vaxxer parents? Even if bullying and berating could work on others, how could that be good for the whole society? What’s wrong with this picture?

Secret Vaccine Court perverts Democracy, Free Choice
Meanwhile, the arcane, secret court which runs the VCIP is overseen by unaccountable, un-elected bureaucrats. The vaccine “court” does not allow families legal “Discovery.” That means they don’t get access to the vaccine makers’ hidden evidence, which constitutes the real story of a drug or device. Every drug and medical device case turns on Discovery. A solid case simply cannot be made without it. Yet even with this enormous, undemocratic, Draconian handicap of not being allowed Discovery, vaccine-injured families have been able to collect billions for their vaccine-injured children. The lack of Discovery, however, also means that a tiny fraction of those who are really injured by vaccination actually get the compensation they deserve. If Discovery were allowed, every bad vaccine batch could potentially be uncovered, vaccine makers in China and elsewhere could be held to account, thousands of children could be saved from vaccine injuries, billions more dollars could be awarded to vaccine-injured families who deserve compensation.

Vaccine Whistleblower Lawsuit
Because vaccine makers are vaccinated by Congress from liability, they have virtually no liability or incentive to make safe or effective vaccines. Merck’s MMR vaccine simply doesn’t work for mumps, yet the company continues to reap billions of dollars from our government, from us, for that vaccine. Merck now faces a whistleblower lawsuit from a former employee who has exposed that the company’s MMR vaccine raises the risk of autism for black boy babies. How come we don’t hear about that in the news? Autism is a catastrophic disease, yet we haven’t heard a peep in the mainstream media how it raises the risk of autism. What’s wrong with this picture.

Advertising Dollars Rule Vaccination Coverage
Retired neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock has noted that all major media figures are under enormous pressure from the billions of marketing dollars spent by Big Pharma. Anyone who works in media knows the story they are supposed to tell, and the stories they are not supposed to cover. It’s an open secret that pharmaceutical companies spend more on advertising than any other industry. Is it insane to suggest that all that money doesn’t buy some “friendly copy” for vaccination cheerleaders? Is that any different than suggesting politicians are corrupted by money into acting against the interests of citizens?

Follow the Money
Follow the money. Who benefits when mainstream media fail to report on vaccine injuries? Who benefits when mainstream media hysterically trumpets the latest measles “outbreak” and completely fails to tell the whole story of vaccination? Who benefits when Big Pharma-captured congressman like Richard Pan of California and other career politicians vote to remove informed consent from parents and force vaccination on schoolchildren?

The Science on Vaccination
Retired neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock has noted, “There’s compelling scientific evidence that vaccines are not as safe as they’re being proposed. In fact, there [can be] significant, serious problems, including death, seizures, encephalitis and severe brain damage. This is well documented in medical literature.”

Vaccine Injured Families receive Billions from Secret Court
Children up to 15 months old now receive 27 doses of 11 different vaccinations. All are approved and recommended by the Center for Disease Control (CDC). The CDC has proven itself to now be a partner with Big Pharma for promoting vaccination. Its policy has been to push more and more vaccinations and to cover up, downplay, or deny anything that does not coincide with that policy. These baby vaccines include Rotavirus (RV), Hepatitis B (for the sexually promiscuous baby?), Influenza, Measles, mumps, rubella (MMR), Tetanus, diphtheria & acellular pertussis (Tdap). All these vaccines that most pediatrician push introduce foreign and toxic substances into the new baby’s bloodstream. They often cause brain swelling and, in the long term, unknown damage. Vaccine ingredients are a cornucopia of toxic horrors that would land someone in jail if they were given by anyone but your doctor. What’s wrong with this picture?

RELATED

Share

Thousands sue over Shingles Vaccine Injuries

Thousands of people injured by the Zostavax vaccine for shingles are suing Merck in Shingles Vaccine Lawsuits. The company that makes Zostavax has caused worse complications than shingles itself. “Side effects” (actual effects!) from Merck’s singles vaccine include shingles, meningitis, encephalitis, stroke, palsy, eye injuries, and many others. These so-called side effects are all features of shingles.

Zostavax was approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) despite a dearth of convincing efficacy tests. The CDC has since recommended that only those 60 and older should take the vaccine. The FDA, by contrast, approved it for people 50 and older. The CDC has also warned that those aged 50 – 59 may lose the alleged protection benefits of the vaccine by the time they reach 60.

People in their 60s are at the greatest risk of getting shingles, which is why the CDC recommends it for that age group. Meanwhile, the vaccine’s labeling does not make clear how long an injection might last (if it works at all, which is an open question). The CDC recommends that people don’t get the shot until they are at least 60,  because that’s probably when they are going to need it the most.

Shingles Vaccine Efficacy Questionable
The CDC has stated – with Merck’s encouragement through short-term studies –  that the Zostovax vaccine reduces the risk of shingles by a mere 51 percent. That paltry number makes it difficult to discern whether it works at all for anyone. Two unconvincing studies by Merck provide flimsy cover for whether the vaccine works at all or is worth the risk.

Shingles Vaccine Injury Lawyer

Attorney David Matthews, whose law firm is handling shingles cases, said injuries from the Zostavax vaccine are many and varied. Shingles vaccine injuries can vary from a person’s contracting shingles to going blind in one eye, suffering brain damage or paralysis in the extremities, or even dying.

Mr. Matthews said, “Merck failed to warn about Zostavax’ serious side effects and the vaccine doesn’t do what Merck claims it does.” (Related: Shingles vaccine made with pig gelatin, MSG and residual components of human DNA from an aborted fetus. Why?)

Merck Comments

Responding to a Natural News story, a Merck spokesperson said, “Nothing is more important to Merck than the safety of our medicines and vaccines.”

If so, then why are thousands of people experiencing ailments associated with the disease the vaccine is supposed to cure? Part of the problem appears to be that the vaccine is made from a live shingles virus. Is Zostavax causing more harm than good? According to Shingles vaccine lawsuits, that is exactly what is happening.

Zostavax Background

•   Zostavax was approved by the FDA in 2006.
•   Zostavax pulled in $749 million in sales for Merck in 2016.
•   Zostavax is the only approved shingles vaccine in the United States.

Meanwhile, GlaxoSmithKline is working on a second shingles vaccine called Shingrix. GSK is still seeking FDA approval for its new vaccine.

RELATED

 

Share

To Vaccinate or Not To Vaccinate?

To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? That is the question. Is it nobler to follow your own doctor’s or pediatrician’s advice? Is it noble to believe the slings and arrows of media gatekeepers hyping measles or Zika hysteria to promote vaccination? Or is it nobler to study the science for one’s self, to think for one’s self, to decide for one’s self whether vaccination is a good thing or not?

We live in a world where it is possible to “phone it in,” to virtually phone in our lives. Many do two or three things at once, perhaps none of them well, at that clip, and this is precisely the point. If we read on the home computer, say, while talking to a friend on the phone, while petting the cat, we can’t be wholly engaged in any one activity. We can’t do one thing well or study it properly in a distracted way.

The problem with learning about vaccination is that we don’t have the luxury of phoning it in. Learning about vaccination is not something we can do while trying to do other things at the same time. It is a very complex subject, one rife with dark emotional arguments, knee-jerk name calling and, of course, fear. This is not an atmosphere that encourages the shining light of learning.

It’s All About FEAR
Every salesman knows that inspiring fear in the mark (or customer) is about short-circuiting Reason. Runaway fear derails Reason, stimulates the fight or flight response, and makes frightened people respond. This includes most of the population, probably most people in the history of the world. Wars, which usually make no sense except for anyone save arms merchants and politicians acting to pad their friends’ business coffers, are typically started in this manner. (Remember the “Weapons of Mass Deception.”) Throughout history, people have been triggered to act out of fear, and to demonize as the “other” all those who haven’t jumped aboard the fear train to drink the Kool-Aide.

Death & Disease Fears for Both Sides
It’s all about fear for those selling vaccination, but it’s also (at least partly) about fear for those opposed to it. The difference in the two sides is that the former rely primarily on fear. They typically try to shame and bully and use name calling fallacies (Anti vaxxer!) to undermine any real discussion of the facts. The latter (those damn ‘anti vaxxers’) use fear too, but they rely more on Reason and Science. The rubber hits the road right there. It’s always easier to get people to act on an emotional response rather than on a reasonable one, even to turn people against their own neighbors, friends, families, with an emotional argument. Even if that argument is completely unbacked by Logic or Reason.

Stubborn Facts
Vaccination facts are something else again, and they are not alternative facts. There are factual reasons that can tell us why it makes sense not to vaccinate, to avoid vaccination altogether. Dr. Suzanne Humphries gives you those facts in her book, “Dissolving Illusions.” But it’s a long book, full of history and science and boring old Reason, so many will likely not bother to read it. (You can’t read and engage with a good book while doing 2-3 other things.)

Sarah, the Healthy Home Economist

Sarah, the Healthy Home Economist, gives a more condensed version of the argument against vaccination. Her essay, “Six Reasons To Say NO to Vaccination,” lays out incontrovertible facts which show vaccination as a pretty insane choice.

Sarah’s Six Reasons to Just Say No

1. Pharmaceutical companies can’t be trusted
Remember HRT? Vioxx? How about 35 other FDA-approved drugs from Big Pharma pulled from the market in the last 30 years or so? Merck, maker of MMR vaccine, the Zostavax Shingles vaccine (which doesn’t work but could make you blind), Gardasil, and other dangerous vaccines, is embroiled in at least two whistleblower lawsuits. Former Merck scientists claim the company faked vaccine data in order to keep lucrative government contracts in the billions of dollars.

2. ALL vaccines are Loaded with Chemicals and Heavy Metals
MSG, antifreeze, phenol, formaldehyde (cancer causing), aluminum (Alzheimer’s, seizures, etc.), glycerin (toxic to kidney, liver, lungs, etc.), lead, cadmium, sulfates, antibiotics, acetone (nail polish remover), neomycin, streptomycin. And THIMERISOL, more toxic than mercury.

A January 2017 study found that ALL vaccines tested were contaminated with heavy metals NOT DECLARED ON THE INGREDIENTS. Any questions?

3. Vaccinated Children Unhealthiest, Most Chronically Sick
Surveys of 12,000 children in the U.S. and Europe revealed the truth of the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children debate. The great vaxxed are more chronically ill than the great unvaxxed. The VAXXED have higher rates for autism, ear infections, ADHD, asthma, allergies (some 30% higher than unvaxxed) and other health problems.

Vaccination Linked with Mental Illness
Yale and Penn State research has demonstrated a strong link between vaccination and mental illness in children. Some 95,000 children analyzed by the Dept. of Public Health Services at Penn State University College of Medicine and Yale University showed the awful truth of vaccination injuries. Vaccinated children showed a strong association with development of brain-related autoimmune and inflammatory disorders: ADHD, OCD, depression, bipolar, anorexia, chronic tic disorder.

4. Other Countries Waking Up to Vaccine Dangers
No country vaccinates more children per capita than the U.S., which stands a woeful #33 in infant mortality rate. How is vaccination helping us again? Japan formerly also had a terrible infant mortality rate, but when it raised its minimum vax age to 2, Japan’s infant mortality rate jumped to No. 3 in the world. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome – SIDS – is most likely caused by vaccination, as poor parents who have experienced it already know. Australia suspended the flu vaccine for children under 5 in 2010 after a huge number were being raced to emergency rooms with febrile convulsions and other vaccine reactions within hours of the jab.

The shingles vaccine doesn’t work, which is likely why the UK continues to not offer it to children, and it triggers the risk of shingles epidemic for adults.

5. Many Troublesome Vaccines have already been removed from market
in 2002, GlaxoSmithKline removed the Lyme Disease vaccine from the market after several vaccinated victims reported symptoms worse than the disease itself. The Rotavirus was removed in 1999 due to life-threatening bowel obstruction or twisting of the bowl. (The label change warning came too late for many, in 2007)

Gardasil, another unnecessary vaccine for a problem that is seldom life-threatening, is a nightmare that has sadly killed or crippled hundreds of young people.

FACT: If these vaccines have problems, all of them likely have problems, as vaccine makers follow the same basic formula when they come up with each new witch’s brew of a shot.

6. You can Always get Vaccinated; You can Never Unvaccinate.
‘First, do no harm,’ is the golden rule for doctors. That’s not how the vaccination works for the thousands of people it has injured or killed. The whole idea of pumping toxins directly into the bloodstream is questionable at best; just plain absurd, or criminal, at worst, especially for children. To assault a newborn with these toxic chemicals is tantamount to insanity, to cruel and unusual punishment, like the absurd practice of circumcision, another dirty little secret, unnecessary and dangerous for defenseless babies, but profitable for their “professional” handlers.

RELATED

Share

Government removes Informed Consent for Drugs, Vaccinations

It is indeed a government of wolves, as John Whitehead has written. In one of its latest ploys to partner with corporations to Lord it over us all, the U.S. government has removed informed consent for drugs and vaccinations. The so-called ‘21st Century Cures Act’ contains a sneak attack on informed consent potentially affecting every citizen of the U.S. The new law includes language that allows the government to experiment on any of us. If the government decides it “needs” to experiment on you or your children, it has now been written into law that it may do so.

Nazi Parallel
As Hitler rose to power in Nazi Germany, he steadily eroded citizens’ rights using pliant politicians, corrupted judges and the thin veneer of “law.”  The very same thing is now happening in our country. If this sounds alarmist, so be it. This is happening right now while the country sleepwalks through another tirade from the Tweeter in Chief or watches the latest game.

The new law, the so-called 21St Century Cures Act, passed by the Obama administration, contains this Draconian language:

Section 3024
“Informed consent waiver or alteration for clinical investigations.
* Amends the FD&C Act to add an exemption from informed consent requirements for clinical trials that pose no more than minimal risk and where appropriate safeguards protecting the rights, safety, and welfare of subjects are in place.”

Orwellian Doublespeake
How ludicrous can Orwellian Doublespeak get?  The law simply removes any right you thought you had to informed consent. Who gets to decide what ‘minimal risk’ is? Pharmaceutical companies making the vaccines or the drugs for the experiment on you? The same government that tells you drinking fluoridated water is good for you, lies to you about the vaccine dangers (virtually none, if you believe your government), stops funding for schools that don’t comply with Big Pharma-driven vaccine mandates?

“I have certain rules I live by. My first rule: I don’t believe anything the government tells me. Nothing. Zero.” – George Carlin

Drug Experiments on You
Section 3024 further contains this language:
“(b) Drugs – Section 505 (;) (4) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355 (I) (4) is amended by striking ‘except where it is not feasible or it is contrary to the best interests of human beings’ and inserting ‘except where it is not feasible, it is contrary to the best interests of such human beings, or the proposed clinical testing poses no more than minimal risk to such human beings and included appropriate safeguards as prescribed to protect the rights, safety, and welfare of such human beings.’”

Minimal Risk and You
So no more informed consent for American citizens for vaccines and drugs. Any citizen can now be part of a “clinical trial” if a drug rep, Big Pharma executive,  lobbyist or corporate drug lawyer who helped write this lovely section – or some other shill for drug and vaccine profits – decides.  That person or persons will decide what “minimal risk” is acceptable for you. Never mind your own education, physical or immunological limitations, or anything else. You no longer have the right to decide, or even to consider for yourself what ‘minimal risk’ might be for you or your children.

The Herd
Thanks to this “Act,” you now have no more rights where the “greater good” is concerned. Your rights will now be determined by whomever is in charge of determining what “minimal risk” is for “the herd.”  And in case you haven’t “heard,” Herd Animal, “herd immunity” is a giant, unsupportable fallacy. So you can take whatever you think you know about vaccination, that crap you’ve heard second or third hand from the mealy mouth of some multi-million dollar vaccine profiteer like Paul Offit, or some other goon, and do a little research for yourself. Learn something. Save yourself and your children and the rest of humanity from the flying monkeys endlessly sent by Big Pharma to do what they will to us.

The Media Circus of Flying Monkeys
The very same media that sold you on all these now obvious lies – the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, the connection of Saddam Hussein and Sept. 11, the wonders of poisoning your water and leaching lead from your water pipes with fluoride, the joy of making your kid autistic with vaccination, the safety of genetically modified food, the not-so-bad pollution (that kills at least 100,000 people outright every year) – those same flying monkeys who try to tell you what is and what is not fake news, those flying monkeys, have failed completely to bring you this story of your vanishing rights to informed consent. This is nothing less than the end of democracy as we once knew it. If there were any real news outlets in the mainstream liars club, this story would be the lead every day until people paid attention and rose up and the law were reversed to reflect the will of the people to govern themselves.

Medical Devices cleared of Informed Consent

The so-called 21St Century Cures Act also gives medical device makers possible exemptions from informed consent.  If those devices are deemed by someone (not you) to be of “minimal risk,” of course. Never mind that the FDA-cleared disasters of transvaginal mesh or hernia mesh, both of which dramatically harmed tens of thousands of people, were considered by ‘the deciders’ to be of “minimal risk.”

With no informed consent, how does anyone know whether they are part of an experiment? We were never informed by government or anyone else that those others could now waive our informed consent.

Minimal Risk FDA-Approved Drugs pulled from Market
Thirty five (35) FDA-approved drugs have been pulled from the market since the 1970’s. The government said every one of these drugs was “minimal risk.” One “minimal risk” drug, Vioxx, is thought to have killed some 250,000 people. (Thank God Vioxx was only a “minimal risk” drug.)

“MINIMAL RISK drugs, kill at least 100,000 a year. Minimal risk drugs, anyone?

Now this government is spraying the skies with Naled (for the ludicrously overhyped Zika virus scare) and Dibrom (a cute little reversible anagram for “Morbid”) and other poisons to “help” us. Many people paying attention are protesting their forced poisoning, and the poisoning of their pets and gardens. The so-called 21St Century Cures Act is a fig leaf of cover for these insane experiments. In each case the cure is worse than the “disease,” which, of course, is virtually always brought about by environmental causes – immune systems weakened by dirty radiated water, filthy air, vaccines loaded with toxic adjuvants (including mercury and Nagalese), genetically modified “food,” poisoned public discourse, toxic politics, toxified people.

Purge Needed
It is time to purge the system of these toxins. These politicians must be brought to do the bidding of those of us who have to drink the poisoned water, eat the lousy food, read and listen to the phoney news. We know who the real newsfakers are. All we need do is turn on our television sets. The news that passes for reality is about as real as the so-called “reality” shows.

RELATED

Share

Merck Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit Filed

Merck is being sued for its alleged shingles vaccine. A Nevada woman filed a Merck shingles vaccine lawsuit against Merck on February 23, 2017. The woman said she suffered several injuries as a result of Merck’s Zostavax Shingles Vaccine. Her petition said she suffered an eye injury, high blood pressure, and other personal indignities from Merck & Co.’s Zostavax.  Law 360 reported that this lawsuit appears to be the first filed over Merck’s artificial immunity shot for shingles. The case was filed in Philadelphia’s Court of Common Pleas.

Failure to Warn
The plaintiff says in her petition that the Zostavax vaccine’s patient information sheet and label and prescribing information failed to warn of the risk of viral infection. Her complaint referenced several reports that followed the vaccine’s introduction in 2006. The reports linked Zostavax to viral infections leading to disease of the central nervous system.

Shingles Warning Label Added

Merck added a warning to Zostavax’ label in August 2014, which said the vaccine could raise one’s risk of getting shingles, but that warning never reached the plaintiff, according to her petition. There can typically be lag time between the announcement of a label change and any label changes actually taking effect; so  legal arguments in the case will at least partly concern whether that label change ever reached the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff said in her petition: “Despite this information and the potential correlation between being administered the Zostavax vaccine and developing an infection within a relatively short period of time, leading to the development of shingles or varicella-zoster virus pneumonia, Merck failed to properly address and provide this information both to patients and the medical providers prescribing the vaccine.”

Shingles Vaccine approved by FDA

The shingles vaccination is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of shingles in people 60 and older. The plaintiff received the shot in November 2014, according to her petition. Shortly afterwards, she said she developed a headache, dizziness, blurred vision. Her complaint said she continues to suffer from injuries to her right eye, elevated blood pressure, headaches, and dizziness. She said the only warnings she received with documentation that accompanied the vaccine indicated the possibility of rash and itching at the injection site.

Vaccine Safety Questioned in Scientific, Medical Journals
The plaintiff in her petition blames Merck & Co. for making and marketing the vaccine when it was aware of the infection risks. She referenced several scientific and medical journals that have questioned the vaccine’s safety.

Merck Shingles Vaccine Lawsuit Filed
The complaint includes claims for negligence, design defect, failure to warn, breaches of express and implied warranties, fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment. The plaintiff also seeks punitive damages.

Shingles Vaccine Attorney

The plaintiff’s attorney said, “We’ve been looking at this potential case for sometime, and we believe it is highly meritorious. (We) believe the vaccine is at best 50 percent effective. Either it is not effective, or it has caused shingles and other issues, like in this case, where it has caused a serious opthamological complication.”

Shingles Vaccine from Jacked-up Chickenpox Vaccine

The shingles vaccine shot for artificial immunity is primarily a more potent version of Merck’s chickenpox vaccine, Varivax.  Zostavax came from Merck’s European joint vaccine venture with Sanofi.  Merck and Sanofi disbanded in 2016.

The case is Bentley v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al, case number 161004102 in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.

RELATED

Share