Vaccine Agenda pushed by CBS

Nov. 7, 2016 —EyeLies The vaccine agenda is pushed by CBS. 60 Minutes viewers were treated last night to pro-vaccine propaganda from the old network. 60 Minutes ran a segment promoting the morally-challenged CDC and trumpeting the creation of a Zika vaccine to cure the wildly overhyped threat of Zika. CBS and the CDC also shill for Merck’s nightmare HPV vaccine Gardasil as well as the highly dubious shingles vaccine.

CBS Credibility Problems

CBS has had credibility problems at least since newsman Dan Rather lied to the entire nation. (CBS has since lied so much it’s hard to keep up.) On Nov. 25, 1963, Mr. Rather proclaimed to the whole country that he had seen the Abraham Zapruder film. He claimed the film demonstrated that John F. Kennedy’s head moved violently forward as he was shot from behind in Dallas.  Six years later, when the whole country had viewed the same film, everyone saw that Mr. Rather and CBS had lied. LIED. We all saw Mr. Kennedy’s head move violently backward with the final fatal shot.

Related: Birth Defects not caused by Zika

Film proves CBS Lies

That violent backward movement definitively proved that our President was shot at least once from the front, which in turn showed that there had been a probable conspiracy involving more than one shooter. The House Select Committee on Assassinations thus ruled that “John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.” (HSCA-1979)  CBS was thus outed as, at best, an untrustworthy news source, and, at worst, a shadow government disinformation puppet. In the words of old Latin: ‘Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus’ – False in one, false in all.

Research shows Zika not cause of Microcephaly

CBS continues its lying traditions with its Zika coverage. The lying eye network should at least research Zika virus history if it wishes to reclaim some semblance of credibility.  Amid the mad Zika hysteria put forth by CBS and other mainstream outlets shilling for Big Pharma’s vaccine “fixes,”  Brazilian doctors have quietly announced that the Zika virus, which has been around since at least 1947, is not solely and perhaps not even partly to blame for microcephaly, the small-headed baby syndrome.  Most of the women who have given birth to damaged babies lived in poverty stricken agricultural areas which use massive amounts of banned Monsanto pesticides. Most were also forcibly vaccinated while pregnant with a T-DAP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) vaccine. That mandated vaccination of pregnant women in northern Brazil that began in October 2014 perfectly paralleled the dramatic rise in microcephaly.  As insane as it may sound, the CDC also supports vaccinating pregnant women.

12,000 Zika cases in Pregnant women with no birth defects

According to a report from the New England Complex Systems Institute (NECSI), the very idea that Zika causes microcephaly is very much in doubt. The institute cites a New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) Study which followed nearly 12,000 Colombian women infected with the Zika virus. The data has shown no positive correlation between Zika and the small-headed baby birth defect.

An analysis revealed the rate of microcephaly to be what would be expected in any area, whether Zika is a factor or not, which is 2 cases in 10,000 births. According to NECSI:

“This gives a consistent interpretation that there is no direct link between Zika and microcephaly except for random co-occurrence.

We note that the base rate of microcephaly in the absence of Zika is 140 per year in Colombia, which is consistent with the approximately 50 microcephaly cases in the first [four] months of 2016, only [four] of which have been connected to Zika. When interpreting Zika as the cause, background cases must be subtracted.”

By June 2016, 11 total microcephaly cases had been reported in women with Zika infections in Colombia. If Zika and microcephaly are linked, NECSI pointed out that the total number of microcephaly cases should rise dramatically in the next few months, reaching more than 10 microcephaly-Zika births each week.

Poisoned Drinking Water

The government began poisoning Brazil’s water in an insane attempt to combat the overhyped threat of Zika, which may be increasing birth defects and continuing a vicious cycle that more vaccination could worsen.

NECSI also suggested, “An alternative cause of microcephaly in Brazil could be the pesticide pyriproxyfen, which is cross-reactive with retinoic acid, which causes microcephaly, and is being used in drinking water.”

Insane Naled Spraying

Meanwhile, Zika hysteria ginned up by CBS and other mainstream outlets has led to illegal spraying of the nerve toxin Naled in Miami and other areas of southeastern America. Miami residents are protesting their forced CDC poisoning. How soon before the CDC begins forcibly poisoning us all? We are all shrunken-headed babies now.

Vaccine Agenda pushed by CBS

Why the vaccine push? It’s the money, stupid. Vaccines make companies like Merck and others billions of dollars. People who work for the CDC often  move through the revolving door into “private practice.” Dr. Julie Gerberding went from director of CDC directly to president of Merck.  She merrily passed “Go” and made several millions more than the requisite $200. The CDC during her tenure had green-lighted several Merck products such as its dubious Gardasil and Zostovax shingles vaccines that have made the company billions.

Vaccines are the perfect business. They represent public risk for private profit; we take all the risks, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and other multi-national drug makers rake in all the profits. Vaccine makers are vaccinated by Congress against liability when their vaccines hurt or kill people, as they often do. Pay no attention to those flu vaccine deaths. Prepare for an avalanche of vaccine propaganda obscuring the real issues, such as the putrid CDC plan to remove our most basic human right of informed consent.



Shingles Vaccine fails 98-99%

The shinglesZostovax vaccine fails 98-99% of the people targeted to take it. To arrive at that conclusion, one needs look only so far as the studies which Merck Pharmaceuticals trotted out for FDA when the shingles vaccine was approved in 2006.

Doctor sees Shingles Vaccine Fails

Dr. David Brownstein set out to do what most doctors should do before prescribing a vaccine to their patients. He worked to discover whether the shingles vaccine made sense for them to take. Rather than simply scan Merck’s shiny promotional brochures or peruse slick shingles vaccine television commercials (along with the rest of us), Dr. Brownstein performed a bit of cursory research, apparently a novel concept for many doctors. Novel, at least, for those who push the shingles vaccine.

Do I need the shingles vaccine?

Dr. Brownstein then wrote a letter to the American Family Physician Journal. He explained to the editor that the question, “Do I need the shingles vaccine?” was one of the most common in his practice. He wrote the letter to help others decide whether the shingles shot was a good idea.

Pity that Dr. Brownstein’s letter went unpublished by the Journal. Every doctor in the country should be made to read it. Dr. Brownstein’s letter reviewed the shingles vaccine article: Prevention of Herpes Zoster in Older Adults, by Jared Kocher, published November 1, 2016. Mr. Kocher summarized the Cochrane Review as such, “The herpes zoster (shingles) vaccine has demonstrated effectiveness in preventing shingles in older adults.”

Related: Natural Foods may help treat Shingles.

Shingles Vaccine helps 1 in 50 People

Author Kocher stated that 50 people aged 60-69 had to be vaccinated in order to prevent one case of shingles. For those over 70, 100 had to be vaccinated in order to help just one person. Therefore, the numbers show that the shingles vaccine is ineffective for 98 of 100 people aged 60-69, and ineffective for 99/100 in those over 70, because 99 of 100 received no benefit.

“I am incredulous that anyone looking at this data could proclaim that the shingles vaccine was effective,” wrote Dr. Brownstein. “In fact, it wasn’t. According to the data, the shingles vaccine was a 98-99% failure.”

At $200 per shot, 50 people aged 60-69 would have to be vaccinated to prevent two cases of shingles, at a cost of $10,000 per case. For those over 70, 100 would need to be vaccinated to prevent one case of shingles, at a cost of $20,000. “Clearly, this vaccine is not cost effective in these tough economic times,” wrote Dr. Brownstein.

Author Kocher also summarized the adverse effect risk of the vaccine. For every 2.8 vaccines given, one person was harmed. In addition, for every one hundred people vaccinated, one had a severe adverse reaction such as rash, fever and/or hospitalization.

Beyond all sense of reason, Mr. Kocher nevertheless concludes the shingles vaccine is “safe, effective and well tolerated. . .”  One needs to ask Mr. Kocher, “For whom?” The one person in 50 that it may work for?

Shingles Vaccine fails 98-99%

One would need to be mentally challenged not to see the conclusion Dr. Brownstein draws, that any conclusion regarding the subject should read that “the herpes zoster (Shingles) shingles vaccine is neither safe, effective, nor well tolerated.”



Natural Immunity Superior to Vaccination

Though some Mercury Safetymedical textbooks funded by Big Pharma donations may claim natural immunity is no different from artificial immunity, the fact is simple and clear: natural immunity is far superior to any artificial immunity allegedly given by “vaccination.”

Alleged Vaccinations

Allegedly is the adverb we want. It is perfectly fair to ask whether some vaccines work at all, or whether they are worth their risks, such as the shingles vaccine. Or the oral polio vaccine, which its inventor Jonas Salk testified in 1976 was the “principal if not sole cause” of all reported polio cases in the U.S. since 1961. The CDC admitted the same thing in 1992.

Natural Immunity

Naturally acquired immunity is magnificent, multifaceted, mysterious –  scientists are still learning about it today. We are born with natural immunity, a gift conferred upon us by our maker. It works GREAT, if we are kept healthy, well fed, and given clean water to help purge our bodies of the sins of our toxic “environment” overrun with corporate polluters and poisoned GMO foods.

Our immune response is a complex interaction between molecules, cells, and organs. It is efficient. It is able to protect us from outside threats as well as internal cells.

Non-specific vs. Specific Immunity

Our immune system can be classified into two parts: non-specific (innate, immediate response) and specific (acquired or antigen specific). These complex parts are constantly communicating and interacting, as is our entire immune system.

When we attain an infection naturally, the virus/bacteria/fungus must penetrate physical barriers (skin), chemicals factors (nasal secretions/membranes, saliva), biological features (gastrointestinal tract flora).

The non-specific components of immunity make up most of our immune resistance systems. Back in the 1980’s, a team at Paris’ Pasteur Institute showed 98% of the immune response triggered at the early stages of infection is non-specific. (Nature Medicine, April 2000)

Specific Immunity – Vaccine Induced

An injectable vaccine bypasses these barriers. In this direct bloodline assault, none of the body’s cells, organs or molecules – which are part and parcel of the body’s primary non-specific response – is activated.

Bad Science

The whole theory of vaccination is arguably erected on an edifice of flawed science. Vaccination is based on the premise (and the superstition, because nothing proves vaccination theory as fact) that we can “trick” our bodies into becoming immune to a disease without suffering any consequences.

The non-specific defense system, the body’s best, developed through thousands of years of evolution, responds immediately to protect the body from all foreign substances, whatever they may be. The non-specific system reduces the workload of the specific defense system by preventing the entry and spread of micro-organisms throughout the entire body. (Essentials of Anatomy and Physiology)

What is Immunity?

Immunity means the protection against infectious disease by either specific or non-specific mechanisms. The word immunity pertains to the immune system or immune response, according to Dorland’s Medical Dictionary.

Direct to Bloodstream Entry

Vaccines are injected directly into muscles, directly into the human bloodstream. This unnatural toxic assault bypasses the body’s natural defense. Pathogens most naturally enter through the mouth or nose, both of which are heavily lined with mucous membranes, packed with IgA, which is the key defender against viral infections. (Essentials of Medicine)

In the triggering of natural immunity, a remarkable number of biological events occur which prompt the body’s miraculous ability to develop true immunity. All of this occurs before the virus or bacteria comes in contact with the person’s bloodstream.  And all of this is bi-passed, short-circuited by vaccination.

Antibody Production does NOT mean Protection

The sole intent of a vaccine is to elicit an antibody reaction. Vaccine makers and their doctor cheerleaders claim the vaccine is “effective” when antibodies are identified in the bloodstream. But antibodies’ presence in the bloodstream has absolutely no correlation to immunity, as witnessed by the fact that the flu shot can give one the flu (as unwittingly proven to millions of people on national television by Dr. Oz and Piers Morgan), and the shingles vaccine can give someone shingles, as proven by the warning label the FDA required Merck to include on its Zostovax shingles vaccine. There is zero proof that elevated antibody titers confer immunity or protection from disease.

Natural Immunity Superior to Artificial Immunity of Vaccination

You read that right: No proof exists anywhere to show a link between antibody count and disease incidence. Researchers have found highly resistant people with extremely low antibody counts, as well as people who developed the disease to which they had high antibody counts.

Dr. Alec Burton discovered that children born with a-gamma globulinemia (inability to produce antibodies) develop and recover from measles and other infectious or contagious disease almost as quickly as other children. (Dr. Alec Burton, published by the British Medical Council)

Life-Long Immunity, a Memory

One of the fundamental features of the immune system is its ability to respond and remember an invading virus or bacteria.

A problem occurs here with the use of vaccines because T cells (memory cells) are extremely slow learners. The most recent research shows that the ability for a T cell to remember requires many encounters instead of one initial exposure.

“It is true that natural infection almost always causes better immunity than vaccines. Whereas immunity from disease often follows a single, natural infection, immunity from vaccines occurs only after several doses.” (Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia)

“The antigens contained in many injectable vaccines will not produce an immune response sufficient enough to confer protection against infection. Of the 23 vaccines currently in routine use, 20 are delivered by injection and stimulate only systemic immunity.”  (Avant Immunotherapeutics)

“It is dangerously misleading and indeed the exact opposite of the truth to claim that a vaccine makes us “immune’ or protects us against an acute disease, if in fact it only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically, with the result that our responses to it become progressively weaker and show less and less tendency to heal or resolve themselves spontaneously.” Dr. Robert Moskowitz, Dissent in Medicine)

Vaccines Inferior to Nutrition, Rest,  Sanitation

Vaccines are promoted by Big Pharma, the CDC, the AMA and an alphabet soup of government entities tethered to Big Pharma funds. Nutrition, rest, proper sanitation and clean water are far more important for anyone wishing to remain healthy in the continuing onslaught that poisons our air, food, water and social and political climates.



Doctors oppose Forced Vaccinations

Many ethical vaccine-dangerdoctors oppose forced vaccinations, but you won’t find that news in any mainstream media reports. Funneling millions of dollars of lobbying money into the coffers of both politicians and media outlets (it’s the advertising, Dummy), Big Pharma has worked hard to demonize anyone who questions the safety or efficacy of any vaccine. Money buys a lot of “loyalty” from politicians and media moguls who work together to keep themselves and Big Pharma in the chips.

Vaccine “Ethics”
Few people understand that there has never been a single study to verify the safety and efficacy of any vaccine. Not one! No reliable study has ever proved that any vaccination has ever worked on any population. Random controlled clinical trials, the gold standard required of any drug released on the market, have never been done on any vaccine. The reason, vaccine profiteers, pushers and their media shills tell us, is because it would be unethical to have a control group of folks not vaccinated to test that group against the group that is. Unfortunately for these shills, we have something like a control group, the Amish who refuse to vaccinate and who have virtually no autism in their communities, save among those vaccinated children they have adopted. Read Sheryl Attkisson’s “Where are the Autistic Amish?” Pro vaxxer shills call it “anecdotal” and therefore irrelevant. They also call the thousands of parents who report their child regressing into autism after vaccination “anecdotal.” You look at all the evidence and decide for yourself.

Pro-Vax Profiteers – Media Darlings

Of course mainstream media darling Paul Offit  – a pro-vax profiteer – and others making millions of dollars from vaccines will point out that the Amish also live with less pollution, fewer foods poisoned with Monsanto pesticides, and other environmental insults visited upon most non-Amish Americans; so they can’t be considered a “true” control group. Sure, some epidemiologist testifying for Big Pharma at a rate of $500 an hour could make a solid Sophist argument against the Amish as a control group. Sure, a well-paid “expert” (Read: lackey) could shoot ink from his pen like a cuttlefish shooting ink from its ass to cloud the facts. Such a well-paid person could try to disprove any such notion that the Amish could be considered a control group compared with vaccinated people. Some people will say anything if you pay them enough.

Vaccine Propaganda Assault muddies Issues
No matter how much most of us lay people are buried in the propaganda assault from some doctors who would demonize all those who wish to choose for their children for themselves whether or not they will vaccinate, there are still doctors who believe in their Hippocratic oath: first do no harm. (There is no question whatsoever that vaccines can and do cause grievous harm.) There are doctors who believe that informed consent is the first rule of medicine. A failure to offer their patients/victims informed consent is the crime that got some Nazi doctors hanged at the hands of a Nuremberg court that followed WWII. Have we really fallen so far as to have forgotten the lessons of that war, of the horrors visited upon people whom the Nazis felt they were smarter than and were thereby ordained (by the devil, clearly) to lord it over and force to take their “therapy”?

First, do no harm
There are, thankfully, several doctors who have not allowed the medical mafia that runs the healthcare system in our country to overwhelm their humanity and moral code. Without that code, we are lower than any animal or being in the universe. Our moral code, or at least the possibility of applying a moral code to all our actions, is the only thing, finally, that makes us superior to any animal in the world. No animal but man tortures another unmercifully, or drops incendiary bombs on others and wipes out entire families or races of people. No animal but man is even capable of the kinds of cruelty man has visited upon his fellow man and other creatures in this world, and nothing has changed under the sun in all the time our kind has been on this earth.

Doctors oppose Forced Vaccinations

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations: Should Their Views be Silenced? is the name of a 51-page book available on Kindle edition. You can read Amazon reviews from nurses, pediatricians and other doctors to give some idea of its content and sensibility. It is a fair primer on vaccination and its safety or lack thereof.

Book Reviews
One nurse says she has seen firsthand how doctors ignore the reality of horrible vaccination “side effects.” Another says he can no longer participate in giving vaccinations to anyone, though that risks losing his job. He says he “simply cannot do it any longer and look myself in the mirror.”

A pediatrician says, “I’m so glad to read about other docs who are not blindly pushing a flawed vaccine product and schedule on patients. There must be accountability for vaccine injuries and they must not be mandatory,” in order to preserve informed consent.

Another reviewer says, “I am humble to be in the range of these upstanding people who speak in the old American tradition, speak your true mind. ‘Iat justitia ruat caelum’ is a Latin legal phrase, meaning ‘Let justice be done though the heavens fall.’  The maxim signifies the belief that justice must be realized regardless of consequences.”

Dr. Russell Blaylock
One reviewer notes a neurosurgeon referenced in the book: “[Dr.] Blaylock’s work is amazing – and for anyone who is truly looking for answers, his expertise as a neurosurgeon will probably put you on the side of waiting until 2 for any childhood vaccines. There are some truly amazing people fighting the good fight, and having watched this for years, their commitment to families and children is now making a difference.”

Making a Difference
The decision to vaccinate, or not to vaccinate, or to at least delay vaccination, may be the most important one people may ever make for themselves and their children. It’s well past time for all thinking Americans to do their own research into the history of vaccination and decide for themselves whether or not vaccination is a good idea grounded in empirical science.




Vaccines Unavoidably Unsafe and Safe

Only in a world where war BayerGascriminals like Henry Kissinger can “earn” Nobel Peace prizes. Only in a world where corporate criminals like Bayer that bankrolled Hitler and used Jews for slave labor can continue to “earn” so much profit that they can buy up criminal enterprises like Monsanto. Only in such a cockeyed world can this statement be “true”: Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe and safe.

Supreme Court: Vaccines Unavoidably Unsafe

It took a great actor-salesman like Ronald Reagan to sign away the legal rights of the vaccine-injured and make it seem somehow palatable, at least to millions of people not paying attention. Later, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” – Bruesewitz v.Wyeth LLC, 131 S. Ct. 1068, 179 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2011).  At the same time (the hand quicker than the eye), the same high court also affirmed that drug companies should be vaccinated against state civil liability lawsuits filed by vaccine-injured children or the survivors of those children killed or injured by vaccines. The so-called “vaccine court” remains a possible avenue of compensation, but 80% of the cases filed there are turned back by the court, which is not really a court at all but a shadowy government tribunal unaccountable to the light of constitutional law.


Following the corporate-friendly reign of Reagan, vaccine profiteers like Paul Offit are endlessly trotted out by mainstream media (the ‘Ministry of Truth’ in Doublespeak) to tell us vaccines are “safe and effective,” that vaccine injuries don’t happen at all, or that vaccine injuries are worth it for the health of the herd. (Artificial herd immunity is a myth; please do some research.) Mr. Offit and others of his ilk always fail to mention that more than $3 billion of government money has been paid out to hundreds of children (and their “lucky” parents) injured by MMR vaccines and other “unavoidably dangerous” vaccines.  There is obviously a GIANT disconnect. How does a reasonable human being fill this gap?

Would that this were some very large conspiracy theory. This is history, simple history, and “he who controls the past controls the present.”

George Orwell – 1984

In George Orwell’s masterwork of a future nightmare, 1984 (published in 1949), the populace is completely controlled by the Fascist marriage of government and industry, just as it is increasingly controlled today with ploys such as the forced vaccination CDC is working to unleash on us all. In Orwell’s “fiction,” as in our “reality,” one must acquire the “skill” of Doublethink to make sense of events. In 1984, Love is Hate, War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery.


“Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and hence of guilt.” (

The Ministry of Peace promotes War; the Ministry of Truth, Lies; the Ministry of Love, Torture; the Ministry of Plenty, Starvation. Today Orwell could add the Centers for Disease Control – the CDC – which promotes poor health via forced vaccination, fluoridated water, polluted air, etc.

World Upside Down

If none of this makes, sense, welcome to the New World Order, which is all upside down, like modern-day politics. Most Democrats despise Hillary Clinton because they know what she really is, a consummate politician who will say one thing but do another, who enriches herself with the sleazy Clinton Foundation, who will say or do anything to get ahead. Meanwhile, many or even most Republicans despise their “choice,” Donald Trump, largely for similar reasons, and for his sociopathological narcissism that certainly rivals and perhaps even “trumps” that of Mrs. Clinton.

But in this upside down world that old Ronald Reagan helped turn on its head, that fails to protect children from dirty or dangerous or lethal vaccines, adults still have some types of tort law protection, such as vaccine injury via the worthless shingles vaccine. At least some avenues of justice still remain open in our broken world.



Merck not Vaccinated against Shingles Vaccine Lawsuits

Vaccine makers Zostovaxare vaccinated against liability for useless, unnecessary or dangerous vaccines “recommended” (read: forced) on children. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 shields vaccine makers from being pursued in civil court by survivors of children killed or injured by vaccines, such as Merk’s dubious MMR vaccine or its ill-fated Gardasil vaccine. Adult vaccines, however, are another story; so Merck is not vaccinated against shingles vaccine lawsuits.

Protect Adults, Suffer the Children

For adults, Congress had the brains to encourage vaccine profiteers to make adult vaccines safer by leaving 200 years of tort law in place; vaccine-injured adults therefore retain the right to sue vaccine makers for personal injuries. For children, Congress lacked the brains (and heart) to encourage that same due diligence.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury act of 1986

National Vaccine Information Center co-founders worked with Congress to produce the dubious 1986 Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34). This Act acknowledges vaccine injuries and deaths are real. It also acknowledges vaccine-injured kids and their families deserve financial help, if only to pay for the horrors of vaccine deaths or injuries. But therein lies the problem.

Government Remedy Woeful

The “help” offered by the 1986 Act is most disingenuous and woeful. It sets up a highly questionable “vaccine court,” which is not really a “court” at all. It is instead a secret tribunal in which some 80% of hapless victims (fools guilty of trusting their government and the drug companies that partner with it) are turned away with no compensation whatsoever. The tiny percentage of those who “win” at this esoteric kangaroo court are “compensated” by the federal government through our tax dollars. The vaccine “court” has grudgingly awarded a total of more than $3 billion to several hundreds of injured parties, but don’t expect to find a peep about that from your favorite MSM outlet, which counts Big Pharma as its No. 1 advertiser (read: employer). Conspiracy Theory? No, Friend; these are facts. Look them up. Connect the dots. Big Pharma spends more advertising money than any other entity in the world. Do you bite the hand that feeds you? (If so, you’re probably homeless. God bless you.)

The number of injuries brought before the vaccine court so overwhelmed the money allotted to compensate victims that the court just arbitrarily (because it could) decided it would not pay some 80% of the vaccination victims seeking redress.

Nowhere is the absurdity of the 1986 Act and the so-called vaccine court more on display than in a tale of two fathers who contracted polio through the useless polio vaccine.

Polio Vaccine Dangerous, Defective
Most of the entire vaccination facade has been built on the myth of polio’s being wiped out by vaccination. Dr. Jonas Salk himself admitted in 1977 that every case of polio in the U.S. diagnosed after 1961 was a result of vaccination. You read that right.

Polio incidence rose dramatically in several places after the introduction of the polio vaccine in 1953. Polio also dropped as much among people who avoided the polio vaccination as much as it did in those who took it.

Six New England states reported increases in polio one year after the Salk vaccine was introduced, ranging from more than doubling in Vermont to Massachusetts’ astounding increase of 642%. In Wisconsin polio cases increased by a factor of five. Idaho and Utah halted vaccination due to the increased incidence and death rate. In 1959 in Massachusetts, 77.5% of paralytic cases had received 3 doses of IPV (injected polio vaccine).

In 1962 U.S. Congressional hearings, Dr. Bernard Greenberg, head of the Dept. of Biostatistics for the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, testified that not only did the cases of polio increase substantially after mandatory vaccinations – a 50% increase from 1957 to 1958, and an 80% increase from 1958 to 1959 – but the statistics were deliberately manipulated by the Public Health Service to give the opposite impression. The polio vaccine “miracle” was not universally swallowed. In Europe, countries that refused mass vaccination dropped their polio rates just as well as those that employed it.

Polio from vaccinated kids

Many, many people contracted polio via vaccination. The only difference was that those who got polio from the vaccination could be compensated prior to 1986, while those who contracted polio from vaccination after 1986 were completely out of luck, unless they could find a lawyer (poorly compensated by vaccine court rules) willing to take a long chance for them at the secretive “vaccine court.”

Two American fathers contracted polio from their infant daughters who received oral polio vaccines. Both men were likely infected by changing their daughters’ diapers. Neither man took the oral polio vaccines; but their infant daughters did.

$22.5 Million Vaccine Injury Verdict

In 1971, a Wall Street executive from Long Island, Dominick Tenuto, became paralyzed. He sued vaccine maker Lederle Laboratories. It took 30 years of legal wrangling and appeals. The jury reached a $22.5 million verdict that was later upheld. New York’s Daily News reported that Mr. Tenuto, who now needs a wheelchair, lost his job and sued in 1981.

Mr. Tenuto said, “Little did I know I would be paralyzed for the rest of my life.” He spent months on a respirator in intensive care. “I was on death’s door,” Mr. Tenuto said. “We called a priest.”

After months of rehabilitation, he recovered somewhat, but remained partially paralyzed. He was lucky to have gotten polio before 1986.

Post ’86 Cases 86’d from Courts and Justice

In 1998, Gregory Clifford checked himself into his local emergency room with leg weakness and severe back pain. Mr. Clifford had changed his daughter’s diaper a few months prior. Mr. Clifford was moved to ER, given a tracheotomy, and put on a ventilator. He suffered respiratory failure. He had polio.

Mr. Clifford was hospitalized in different places for more than a year, before he died of pneumonia that was secondary to his polio infection.

But unlike Mr. Tenuto, the Clifford family’s legal options were limited by the 1986 Act that gave the federal government exclusive jurisdiction in vaccine injury claims. His grieving family was out of luck.

A Vaccinated Industry?

It is a tragic miscarriage of justice that still obtains today. It should make anyone with a pulse think twice about the safety of vaccines. Name one other industry that brings in profits of some $42 billion dollar yet is completely insulated from liability. If vaccines are so safe and effective, why aren’t their victims allowed a REAL day in a REAL courtroom?

The answer is as easy as anything in this world: they could NEVER stand up to the scrutiny of Discovery, of Depositions of all the Profiteers and paid-for scientists, researchers and lobbyists making a living in the vaccine industry, romancing congressmen, buying influence, contributing millions to both political parties in our broken two-party system.

Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus

False in one, false in all. Nietzsche said, “It doesn’t bother me that you lied to me. What bothers is that I know longer believe you now.”  The government, Merck, and their minions have lied forever about the polio vaccine myth. What makes them trustworthy now?  Why be the next victim of an unnecessary or worthless vaccine?




Mumps Vaccine Lawsuit says Merck Stonewalling

A mumps vaccine Former Merck Employee speaks against Vaccinationlawsuit says Merck is stonewalling, refusing to give evidence which the suit has demanded be produced.  In response, Merck cannot or will not give proof that its mumps vaccine works as advertised. The drug giant is being sued by former employees who charge that the company faked data to keep  U.S. government money coming to Merck for the mumps vaccine. Merck makes $1 billion a year in liability-free vaccine sales to the U.S. government.

Related Story: Merk Shingles Vaccine? Really?

Merck Scientists sue Merck

Two former Merck & Co Inc scientists have accused Merck of falsifying tests of its exclusive mumps vaccine.  The former employees charged in a court filing last summer that Merck refused to respond to questions about the vaccine’s efficacy.

Attorneys for the scientists asked U.S. Magistrate Judge Lynne Sitarski of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to make Merck respond to their discovery request. The request demands Merck give efficacy of the vaccine as a percentage. Merck is evidently unable or unwilling (or perhaps both) to do so.

Merck gives 50 Year Old Data

Merck has refused to answer the question, the plaintiffs’ letter said, and has been consistently evasive. Merck has instead used “cut-and-paste” answers, claiming that it cannot run a new clinical trial to determine the vaccine’s current efficacy. In lieu of meaningful evidence, Merck gave the petitioners’ data from 50 years ago.

Merck fails to offer proof of Vaccine’s Efficacy
The letter stated: “Merck should not be permitted to raise as one of its principal defenses that its vaccine has a high efficacy, which [Merck claims] is accurately represented on the product’s label, but then refuse to answer what it claims that efficacy actually is.”

Reuters reported that a representative of Merck could not immediately be reached for comment on the story.

Merck Whistleblower Lawsuit
Two former Merck scientists, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, filed their whistleblower lawsuit in 2010. Their suit claims Merck, the only company licensed by FDA to sell a mumps vaccine in the U.S., skewed tests of the vaccine by adding animal antibodies to blood samples.

Merck used the skewed results, the scientists said, to fake test results that showed the vaccine 95 percent effective. More accurate tests would have shown a lesser success rate, said the lawsuit. The scientist plaintiffs said Merck’s falsified results also kept potential competitors out of the lucrative mumps vaccine market, because competitors could not match the inflated success rate Merck claimed.

Merck Mumps Vaccine Class Action Lawsuit

Based on the Merck whistleblowers’ lawsuit, others who bought the Merck mumps vaccine filed a proposed antitrust class action lawsuit in 2012 – Chatom Primary Care, based in Alabama, and two individual doctors. The two suits have been coordinated before U.S. District Judge C. Darnell Jones and Magistrate Judge Sitarski.

The case is United States ex rel Krahling et al v. Merck & Co Inc, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 10-4374.




The Vaccine Lottery – Sacrifice the Children

“The Lottery” is Vaccine Pushersa powerful short story written by Shirley Jackson. The people of an unnamed town meet somewhere on its outskirts. Dramatic tension builds as we are not told the meeting’s purpose.  (Spoiler Alert: ‘The Vaccine Lottery – Sacrifice the Children’ is not a feel good story.)

The children play as children will, but the adults in the tableaux are uneasy. Some huddle in small groups and whisper quietly among themselves. Anxiety pervades the air, a sense of doom made worse by our total uncertainty of  what will happen next. A certain weird optimism runs through some people, while others seem more and more unsettled.

A beat-up black box soon appears, and the people are told their family names will be called alphabetically. One by one, each called person draws out a single small piece of paper. Each in turn holds up the paper to the eyes of the crowd, then joyfully proclaims and shows the drawn little piece of paper is blank. Each person who draws a blank is overcome with joy. Some scream and cry with pleasure and apparent relief at their good fortune. (Or what the reader comes to think is their good fortune.)

And then one person finds her piece of paper is marked with a black spot. She screams, but her scream is horrible, terrifying. She pleads with the crowd, “It isn’t fair! It isn’t right!”

The mob of townspeople quickly fan out into a circle around the woman. They have each gathered a small pile of rocks. And then they are upon her.

The Meaning of The Lottery

Forced to read the story in school, some apparently dense students have no idea what it means and don’t care to find out or discuss it. They just think the whole thing is crazy; but maybe they’re not that dense. It clearly IS crazy. Other students like to guess at the meaning or discuss the possible meanings of this parable. One thing is certain: The woman is killed senselessly, horribly, even joyfully by the people around her.  Even her own family joins in on her stoning. Why? Because it is a tradition. It must be done.

Some point to the story as dramatizing a ritual dating back to the Druids or other tribes, cabals, or primitive peoples who believed sacrificing one of their own to the Gods was necessary. Sacrifice was “needed” in order to produce abundant crops, deliverance from sins, fecundity for the race, or whatever else the people valued and believed they had to pay God(s) in blood for.

Sacrifice and Superstition

Some primitive societies flung children into fiery pits or bogs. Others selected full-grown adults or even their own Kings or other leaders. According to The Golden Bough, sacrificial victims were often honored to be chosen and went willingly to their deaths. Merck’s dubious Shingles vaccine gives some older folks the same chance at sacrifice they may have missed as children, when the autism rate was one in 10,000, compared to 1/50 today, as Big Pharma and its government minions have  turned kids into cash-cow pin cushions for every conceivable vaccination.

Sacrifice and Superstition ruled the days then just as they do now. More than $3 billion of our tax dollars have been spent on vaccine-related injuries, including deaths from vaccines; so there is no argument that vaccines cause harm, or that they can kill people outright. Vaccines can and do cause great harm. Vaccines have killed people, period; but the arguments, of course, continue. Most people believe, despite a complete absence of evidence, that vaccination works as its promoters say it does.

Forced Vaccination for All

The argument for forced vaccination for all (which is already here) can only be this: Oh sure, a few people are killed or maimed by vaccines; that’s an indisputable fact.  A few people draw the black mark, so we have no choice but to sacrifice them.  Our vaccination programs are for the good of the whole tribe. We can’t be concerned about the injuries or deaths of a few with the existence of the whole society at stake. So let’s just go ahead and accept the injuries or deaths of these unlucky people who draw the mark. And never mind that herd immunity through vaccination is a deadly impossibility. (Read the humane, intelligent, scientific work of Dr. Russell Blaylock.)

The Vaccine Lottery – Sacrifice the Children
The problem, of course, is maybe you don’t want you or one of yours to draw the mark. Or maybe you don’t want to think about this subject at all unless and until you or one of yours draws the mark?

Meanwhile, current vaccine discussions mostly miss this eerie parallel, that our vaccination policy today – especially for children who are forced to take as many jabs as the CDC, Merck, vaccine-profiteer Paul Offit and their lackeys in Congress decide to give them – would likely shock even Shirley Jackson. Ms. Jackson seemed to be making a pretty compelling comment regarding our human capacity for superstition and cruelty. The groupmind, as Edward Bernays reveals in his 1928 Opus Propaganda, is different from the individual one, and must be manipulated in a different way.

How many more children and others should be sacrificed via vaccination to satisfy our alleged insurance policy of artificial immunity?

So Long

Line up for the vaccine lottery and keep your mouth shut. Sacrificing some citizens for the benefit of all is a tried and true method practiced for centuries. Why should our current age be any different? Why should we stop and think about things when our superstitions have served us so well for so long?



EPA claims Glyphosate Unlikely To Cause Cancer

The U.S. EPAmonsanto-logo1 now claims glyphosate is unlikely to cause cancer in humans. The agency didn’t bother to evaluate the product that much of the world uses – Roundup, which has been linked to kidney and liver damage in numerous studies.  EPA chose only to examine one active ingredient in Roundup, glyphosate.

The EPA announced on September 16, 2016 that it did a scientific review of glyphosate. The Environmental Protection Agency claimed it compiled the available scientific studies on the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate. The agency concluded that the most suitable classification it could assign would be “‘not likely to be carcinogenic to humans’ at doses relevant to human health risk assessment.”

Doses Relevant to Human Health Risk?

The larger question, of course, is exactly what glyphosate doses did the Monsanto-friendly agency decided to assess? And more importantly, did EPA assess the entire chemical makeup of Roundup, which is the real “dose” that people and their food get. Glyphosate is only the main active ingredient in Roundup. No toxicology or cancer study could be relevant without assessing the entire chemical batch now sprayed on most of the country’s corn and soybeans. So finding that glyhphosate is unlikely to cause cancer is essentially a non issue, though it may help Monsanto throw up a smoke screen to ward off litigation in Roundup Cancer Lawsuits. Glyphosate alone was never the problem. The problem is the entire formulation of Roundup, and the EPA knows that as well as Monsanto does.

EPA claims Glyphosate Unlikely To Cause Cancer

EPA conducted the review as glyphosate undergoes its mandated 15-year review under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. EPA’s proposed conclusions are now up for review by the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel, which will meet in October 2016 to review the EPA findings.

The agency wrote: “Overall, animal carcinogenicity and genotoxicity studies were remarkably consistent and did not demonstrate a clear association between glyphosate exposure and outcomes of interest related to carcinogenic potential.”

The EPA charged the advisory panel with commenting on the EPA’s review and analysis of the studies. After giving the panel a chance to make any necessary changes, the regulator will open the panel’s findings up to a 60-day public comment period.

Cancer Risk Analysis Only

The risk analysis published Sept. 16, 2016 by the EPA studies only the herbicide’s cancer potential. The agency said a full review of the risks to humans, which will also include non-cancer risks, should come out in 2017. (Probably just in time to dispute another pronouncement from some other agency – such as the WHO, which famously announced last year that glyphosate was “probably carcinogenic” to humans).

Glyphosate a Probably Carcinogen – WHO

The EPA did note, however – dutifully reported Law 360 – that other agencies have reached conflicting conclusions on a glyphosate cancer link, including a “probable carcinogen” designation in 2015 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, a division of the World Health Organization, along with the California EPA’s designation of Roundup as a “probable carcinogen.”

Monsanto is currently facing lawsuits by people who claim glyphosate caused their cancer.

Last week, a Delaware state judge refused to dismiss a lawsuit brought by three people who claim they were hurt by exposure to Roundup while employed as migrant workers. They also lived in migrant worker housing, or were employed by a horticultural products company.

Monsanto is also fighting a federal lawsuit brought by a California consumer claiming the use of Roundup lawn spray gave her non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Gluyphosate Non-Hodgkin’s Lymophoma Link Inconclusive

In its report Friday, the EPA noted that non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was one area where the data was inconclusive. Authors of the EPA study dispatched this quote re: NHL:

“In epidemiological studies, there was no evidence of an association between glyphosate exposure and numerous cancer outcomes; however, due to conflicting results and various limitations identified in studies investigating [non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma], a conclusion regarding the association between glyphosate exposure and risk of NHL cannot be determined based on the available data.”

World Overloaded with Glyphosate Poison

The EPA’s study also indicated that the total use of glyphosate in the country has grown enormous, from 1.4 million pounds in 1974 when it was first registered, to almost 300 million pounds in 2014.

EPA Dissapears 1980s Glyphosate Cancer Comment
When glyphosate use was exploding in the mid-80s, the EPA classified it as a “possible human carcinogen.” Since then, glyphosate was recommended to be classified as Group D in 1986 (not enough data to tell if it’s a carcinogen or not) and then by magic moved by EPA to Group E in 1991 (evidence of non-carcinogenicity in humans).

Elephant in the Room

The elephant in the room in the EPA’s proclamation is that glyphosate is the main active ingredient in Roundup, and the so-called inert ingredients are not inert. Taken together, Roundup packs a powerful poison punch that can kill not only insects but people. Many Indian farmers have killed themselves by drinking it after their  Monsanto GMO cotton crops have failed and left them in impossible debt. Nearly 300,000 Indian farmers have committed suicide after being “helped” by Monsanto. A Japanese study from 2016 has also shown just how lethal glyphosate can be. People have suffered organ failure and died from glyphosate exposure.

To be continued. . .



Viagra Melanoma Risks Not Disclosed, says Lawsuit

Viagra melanomaviagra2 risks were not disclosed by Pfizer, says a lawsuit brought in California. The Big Pharma giant failed to warn men that using the erection enhancement drug could substantially raise their risk of developing the potentially deadly cancer.

The lawsuit filed September 9, 2016 charges that Pfizer knew of the melanoma risks of Viagra, yet failed to disclose them. The company’s motivation, says the petition, was to increase profits, despite the dangers to men’s health. The lawsuit charges Pfizer with aggressively promoting Viagra without admitting that the company’s own research had linked it to an increased risk of developing melanoma.

The consumers’ complaint alleges Pfizer knew or should have known about health risks associated with Viagra and Revatio. The latter is the same substance as Viagra, though Revatio, used for treating a lung condition, is sold under a different name. Pfizer failed to disclose this information on its labels or in its advertisements, says the petition.

Melanoma can be deadly
Melanoma – the most dangerous lethal form of skin cancer, according to – kills an estimated 10,130 people in the US yearly. It is a tumor of melanin-forming cells, typically a malignant tumor associated with skin cancer. Melanoma(s) can appear anywhere on the body.

Melanomas are cancerous growths that can develop when unrepaired DNA damage to skin cells (usually caused by ultraviolet radiation from the sun or tanning beds) triggers mutations. These mutations are genetic defects that can lead the skin cells to rapidly multiply and form malignant tumors, which originate in the pigment-producing melanocytes in the basal layer of the skin (epidermis).

Melanomas can resemble moles, and some moles develop into melanomas. While most melanomas are black or brown, they can also appear skin-colored, pink, red, purple, blue, or white.

Melanoma is caused mainly by intense, occasional UV exposure (frequently leading to sunburn), especially in people genetically predisposed.

Melanoma is nearly always curable when it is recognized and treated early. If undetected, the cancer can mutate and spread to other parts of the body, where it becomes harder to treat. Left untreated, it can be fatal. In 2016, an estimated 76,380 of diagnosed melanomas will be invasive, affecting some 46,870 men and 29,510 women.

Viagra Marketing Deceptive

Viagra marketing was deceptive, says the lawsuit. The master complaint reads, in part:
“Pfizer purposefully downplayed, understated and outright ignored the melanoma-related health hazards and risks associated with using Viagra. Pfizer also deceived potential Viagra users by relaying positive information through the press, including testimonials from retired, popular United States politicians, while downplaying known adverse and serious health effects.”

Melanoma victims dropped from studies

The master complaint charge that Pfizer should have known by the late 1990s of the connection between Viagra and melanoma. Pfizer knew as early as 1998 that people taking Viagra had dropped out of clinical studies because they had developed cancers that started in the skin or in the tissue lining organs. The complaint cites a Center for Drug Evaluation and Research joint clinical review.

Several Studies show Viagra Melanoma Risks

The master complaint also says that several studies have since found links between the manner in which Viagra works and the development of melanoma cells.

Viagra inhibits the secretion of a specific enzyme that can prevent erection, says the complaint; however, studies over the last few years have found that blocking this enzyme can also trigger the creation of melanoma cells.

84% Increased Risk of Melanoma

A 2014 study, for example, reported that those of the nearly 25,850 participants who had recently used the medication showed an 84 percent increase in the risk of developing or worsening melanoma. That risk was even higher for those who had used Viagra at any time in the past, says the complaint.

Pfizer nevertheless has engaged in a “continuous, expensive and aggressive” advertising campaign – charges the complaint – to promote Viagra since the FDA approved it in 1998. The company made more than $1.8 billion from Viagra sales in 2013, according to the company’s annual report.

The master complaint reads: “As a direct, proximate and legal result of Pfizer’s negligence and wrongful conduct, and the unreasonably dangerous and defective characteristics of the drug Viagra, individual plaintiffs suffered severe and permanent physical and emotional injuries. (These) physical injuries have included melanoma as well as the resulting treatment and surgeries necessitated by the skin cancer diagnosis.”

The master complaint also makes several other allegations that include negligence, unfair and deceptive trade practices, strict liability, breach of express and implied warranty, unjust enrichment, fraud and deceit, and negligent misrepresentation and concealment.

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated several Viagra lawsuits that bring similar claims.

The suit is In re: Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability Litigation, suit number 3:16-md-02691, in the U.S. District Court for the California Northern District.