Monsanto Must Give Docs In Syngenta MDL

Monsanto may soon need to add some provision in its employment contracts to keep former employees from testifying in other GMO matters. A former Monsanto lawyer is giving the company something else to think about as he has testified as a GMO expert in a matter that didn’t even concern Monsanto directly in the first place.

In its endless quest to hide its poison programs and the way it does business, Monsanto had refused to let its former company lawyer hand over documents in a recent multi-district litigation action. Two judges responded by saying the former Monsanto attorney must give up some of the questionable documents in the Syngenta MDL.

On March 24, 2017, a Kansas federal court partially granted a demand from a group of corn producers to force a former Monsanto in-house lawyer to hand over Monsanto documents. Plaintiffs argued that the Monsanto lawyer could be holding relevant information in what the plaintiffs called Syngenta’s false promotion of genetically modified corn.

Two Judges say Monsanto must hand over docs
Former Monsanto Associate General Counsel J. Thomas Carrato, one of Syngenta’s designated experts, was ordered by U.S. Magistrate Judge James P. O’Hara and Minnesota Special Master John B. Van de North to produce documents related to industry standards for commercialization of new genetically modified (GMO) crops. Mr. Carrato has opined that Syngenta acted in a manner consistent with those standards.

Privileged & Confidential?
Law360 reported that Monsanto tried in two actions to quash subpoenas from the corn producers. The poison giant had argued that complying would require Mr. Carrato to produce privileged and confidential documents which came to him while he was on Monsanto’s payroll. The corn producers had filed in each of the two actions a cross-motion to compel Mr. Carrato to produce documents from his personal files. They argued the documents would let them assess and challenge Mr.  Carrato’s opinions.

Monsanto can withhold some documents
Judge O’Hara and Special Master Van de North jointly granted in part and denied in part Monsanto’s motion to quash and granted in part and denied in part the corn producers’ motion to compel.

“Mr. Carrato and Monsanto assert that Mr. Carrato should not be required to produce documents subject to the confidentiality agreements between them,” the joint order said. “Mr. Carrato cites Snowden v. Connaught Labs Inc., in which the court held that the defendants were not required to produce documents in violation of a confidentiality agreement with a third party. The undersigned respectfully decline to follow the Snowden result, which is not supported in the opinion by any reasoning or caselaw.”

On Jan. 19, 2017, the U.S. magistrate partly granted Monsanto’s emergency request to intervene in the MDL to seek a protective order relating to Mr. Carrato’s deposition. The barrister was Monsanto’s in-house counsel for nearly 22 years and then a Monsanto consultant until 2016.

The U.S. magistrate refused what he termed Monsanto’s “implied request” to exclude Mr. Carrato from serving as a witness. The judge held that the deposition would go forward, but said Monsanto could send lawyers to advise Mr. Carrato.

Syngenta sued for $1 Billion
In September 2016, U.S. District Judge John W. Lungstrum granted certification to a nationwide group of corn producers who had brought Lanham Act claims in the multidistrict litigation. The MDL court plaintiffs allege that Syngenta’s promotion of genetically modified corn cost them at least $1 billion.

Judge Lungstrum certified a nationwide class of corn producers who priced any corn for sale after Nov. 18, 2013, and have brought claims under the Lanham Act. He excluded those who bought Syngenta GMO seed strains Viptera and Duracade, and also excluded statewide classes from Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota.

China Refused GMO Strains
The producers charge that they lost an enormous amount of money when the presence of the unapproved GMO strains in U.S. exports all but shut down the Chinese market to U.S. corn.

The parties filed dueling summary judgment motions on Feb. 6, 2017. The plaintiffs asked for partial summary judgment on several of Syngenta’s affirmative defenses. Syngenta asked for a quick win on the nationwide Lanham Act class claims, as well as the Kansas state class’ negligence claims.

Court filings show that the trial on those claims is scheduled for June, 2017. Judge Lungstrum said in January that the non-Kansas certified class actions will also be tried in the present court. He told plaintiffs to file a consolidation motion after he rules on the summary judgment requests.

Many of the motions in the case are sealed at the request of Syngenta and Monsanto; so it’s difficult to get many helpful details.

Bellwether Cases for Corn Producers
Bellwether cases had been set in August 2017 for corn producers and nonproducers in the MDL. Court records show that each side has selected one nonproducer and two producer plaintiffs for a total of six indicator trials. Farmers from four states will serve as the four producer bellwether cases. Trans Coastal Supply Co. Inc. and Rail Transfer Inc. will serve as the two nonproducer bellwethers.

Monsanto told Law360 through a spokesman that during Mr. Carrato’s time as a consultant from 2014 to 2016, he had confidentiality agreements with Monsanto, and also legal ethical obligations that govern the client-lawyer relationship.

The Monsanto mouthpiece said: “Monsanto’s sole objective in intervening into the Syngenta litigation is to prevent the disclosure of Monsanto confidential information or any information that may be subject to the attorney client privilege or attorney work product doctrine.”

Law360 said reported that representatives for the corn producers and Syngenta did not immediately respond to requests for comment on March 24.

Monsanto Must Give Docs In Syngenta MDL
The case is In re: Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn Litigation, case number 2:14-md-02591, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas.

RELATED

Share

Monsanto, U.S. Regulators Poison World

Two new reportsrats show how chemical companies like Monsanto and U.S. regulators poison the world. On March 17, 2017, Alternet detailed the reports which prove once for all that growing food with poisons is a very bad idea. (Who’d have thunk it? Only anybody who doesn’t work for Monsanto, and anybody capable of thinking.) There’s good reason why most of the civilized world outside the U.S. fights Monsanto to keep the company from further poisoning the world’s food supply and people.

Monsanto’s cozy Relationship with Regulators

Writer Katherine Paul has detailed how two new reports just published add to the already huge body of convincing evidence — from more than 50 years of research —  that pesticides and other toxic chemicals used in agriculture are poisoning us all.

Both reports issue scathing indictments of the cozy relationships between U.S. and global regulatory systems and chemical companies. Together they work to hide the truth in order to increase industry profits at the expense of our health and Mother Earth (one and the same).

Pollution, Pesticides Killing Children
The World Health Organization report focused on a range of environmental risks. It found the cost of a polluted, pesticided environment leads to the deaths of some 1.7 million children each year.

A Myth that Kills
The Special Rapporteur on the right to food presented a report to the United Nations Human Rights Council. The report focused on agricultural chemicals. That report states unequivocally that Monsanto’s story line about feeding the world by using pesticides is completely false. Monsanto is not feeding the world nutritious food, despite all the company’s shameless propaganda; and the need for pesticides is a myth that kills.

Both reports made headlines in a handful of mainstream outlets like the Washington Post and the Guardian, but far more exposure is needed for people to wake up to to prevent their own undoing.

Silent Spring
In the early 1960’s, Rachel Carson eloquently outlined the insanity of poisoning our environment in her book Silent Spring. But since that time, U.S. regulators bought and paid for by Monsanto and other biotech bullies have paid little heed to that insanity. We seldom follow the reasonable, precautionary principle when it comes to allowing poisons to be unleashed on us all.

More Poisons assured as Trump guts EPA
President Trump now wants to gut the EPA and further “deregulate” our protections from corporate insanity, greed, cruelty, stupidity. The most corporate-friendly administration in history is doing everything possible to dismantle what little remains of the U.S. government’s power to stop the runaway poisoning of our land, food, water, air, wildlife.

The Environment Card

Calling the world we live in our “environment” is misleading. The environment is not separate from us. It IS us, where we live. We swim in it from cradle to grave, like fish in a tank. Our very lives depend on it; but life is cheap in this political climate. Those with money or working for Monsanto apparently think they breathe different air than the rest of us, drink different water, eat different food. They are partly right, (if the reports we hear of Monsanto’s HQ serving only organic food are right), but in the larger sense they are not right at all. Nobody can entirely escape the poisoned world, the “environment,” anymore than we can.

EPA Captured by Industry
While Trump is working to gut the EPA with a $2.6 billion budget cut, it is instructive to note that even before the combover king decided to de-fang the agency, it was already captured and compromised by industry. E. G. Vallianatos worked for the EPA for 25 years, then wrote a book called Poison Spring: The Secret History of Pollution and the EPA.

Mr. Vallianatos wrote:

“It is simply not possible to understand why the EPA behaves the way it does without appreciating the enormous power of American’s industrial farmers and their allies in the chemical pesticide industries, which currently do about $40 billion per in year business. For decades, industry lobbyists have preached the gospel of unregulated capitalism, and Americans have bought it. Today, it seems the entire government is at the service of the private interests of America’s corporate class.”

That was written in 2014. Now it is much worse. Though public opinion has shifted against poisoning our food with toxic chemicals, U.S. public health and safety officials appear more determined than ever to uphold the “rights” of corporations to poison us all, and everything else they can.

‘UN experts denounce “myth” pesticides are necessary to feed the world’
That Guardian story headline on the report delivered this week to the UN Human Rights Council nicely summed up the mess Monsanto and others have made of our food supply. The Guardian said:

“A new report, being presented to the UN human rights council on Wednesday, is severely critical of the global corporations that manufacture pesticides, accusing them of the ‘systematic denial of harms,’ ‘aggressive, unethical marketing tactics’ and heavy lobbying of governments which has ‘obstructed reforms and paralysed global pesticide restrictions.’”

Pesticides’ Catastrophic Effects

The report says pesticides have “catastrophic impacts on the environment, human health and society as a whole,” including an estimated 200,000 deaths a year from acute poisoning. Its authors said: “It is time to create a global process to transition toward safer and healthier food and agricultural production.”

The UN report was written by Hilal Elver, special rapporteur on the right to food, and Baskut Tuncak, special rapporteur on “toxics.” The report stated that chronic exposure to pesticides has been linked to cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s diseases, hormone disruption, developmental disorders, sterility. Populations most at risk include farmers, agricultural workers, others living near plantations, indigenous communities, pregnant women, and especially children, who require special protections which they seldom get from U.S. regulators.

The Crop Protection Association, a lobbying group representing the $50-billion agri-chemical industry, fired back at the report with its standard propaganda, false on its face, that pesticides “play a key role in ensuring we have access to a healthy, safe, affordable and reliable food supply.”

The Myth that Pesticides are useful and necessary

Mr. Elver told the Guardian:

“ It (the need for pesticides) is a myth. Using more pesticides is nothing to do with getting rid of hunger. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), we are able to feed 9 billion people today. Production is definitely increasing, but the problem is poverty, inequality and distribution.

Monsanto, U.S. Regulators Poison World

Sustainable Pulse (SP) also reported on the story. SP noted that the report warns that some pesticides can persist in the environment for decades. It remains to be seen whether the rest of us will last for decades given the extent of Monsanto’s poisoning of our bodies, minds, and politics.

RELATED

 

Share

Glyphosate makes Cancer List, says Court

Glyphosate makes Roundupthe Cancer List, said a California state judge March 13, 2017. Fresno County Superior Court Judge Kristi Culver Kapetan rejected a Monsanto lawsuit which claimed a state agency has no authority to list glyphosate – from Roundup – on a list of cancer-causing chemicals.

Related:  Roundup Cancer Lawsuits

The judge rejected all of Monsanto’s claims. Lawyers for the biotech giant from Missouri had alleged that the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment violated the state’s Constitution by acknowledging that the International Agency for Research on Cancer listed glysophate as a probable human carcinogen. Several environmental groups sided with California, while several chemical agriculture industry front groups funded by Monsanto backed Monsanto.

Glyphosate makes Cancer List, says Judge

Judge Kapetan cited the California Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in Kugler v. Yocum. The judge in that case ruled that a proposed ordinance which would have required one city to match another’s minimum wage for firefighters was not an unconstitutional delegation of its authority.

Judge Kapetan said, “Likewise, in the present case, the … listing mechanism does not constitute an unconstitutional delegation of authority to an outside agency, since the voters and the Legislature have established the basic legislative scheme and made the fundamental policy decision with regard to listing possible carcinogens under Proposition 65, and then allowed the IARC to make the highly technical fact-finding decisions with regard to which specific chemicals would be added to the list.”

Proposition 65 snares Monsanto & Glyphosate
Proposition 65, a state Monsanto eats GMO Studiessafety initiative approved in 1986, requires California to publish a list of chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive damage. Monsanto fears that listing glyphosate as carcinogenic will give away the company’s whole game of poisoning the entire world under the guise of feeding it.  Just ask Seralini’s rats how fed GMO corn poisoned with glyphosate worked for them. Besides causing cancer, Roundup with glyphosate has been linked to kidney and liver damage, and more.

Monsanto loses Quasi-Legislative Act Argument
Monsanto had also alleged that California’s listing mechanism violates due process clauses of both the state and federal constitutions, because Monsanto’s property interest in the Roundup trademark and its reputation will be damaged if glyphosate is listed. Judge Kapetan again disagreed, ruling that the state office’s decision is not subject to due process claims because it’s a quasi-legislative act.

Monsanto argues Free Speech Violation
The judge also denied Monsanto’s claim that listing glyphosate as carcinogenic would violate the company’s right to free speech under the state and federal constitutions. In this failed argument, Monsanto lawyers claimed that a cancer listing would force Monsanto to include a warning label regarding the possible cancerous effects of glyphosate. (Imagine that – a cancer warning on a probable carcinogen.) Monsanto claimed that such a warning would be “false and misleading,” and would not advance any legitimate or substantial government interest. (In this argument, a citizen’s right to avoid carcinogens is, of course,  mute.)

Judge Kapetan agreed with the state office that Monsanto’s First Amendment claim is not ripe for adjudication because the mere listing of glyphosate does not require Monsanto to provide a warning.  Indeed, even with a carcinogenic listing for glyphosate, Monsanto may never be required to give such a warning. (Did you expect any of this to make sense?)

Monsanto gets an Out

The judge also noted that the hazard assessment office has the discretion to determine that glyphosate poses no significant risk of causing cancer even if glyphosate is placed on the Proposition 65 list.

Monsanto spokesman Cole Waggoner argued that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the European Food Safety Authority and the State of California have determined that glyphosate does not cause cancer.

Said Mr. Waggoner: “The agency’s flawed and baseless proposal to list glyphosate under Proposition 65 not only contradicts California’s own scientific assessment, but it also violates the California and U.S. Constitutions. We disagree with the court’s ruling, and we will continue to fight the decision on the basis of sound science and the law.”

Environmentalists and others opposed to glyphosate and Monsanto’s entire chemical poisoning business model point out that all those entities Mr. Waggoner lists are compromised by Monsanto and the biotech industry. Money is, as everyone knows, a highly corrupting influence that can make black appear white and evil good, just so long as somebody is willing to pay the freight to turn truth on its head.

Glyphosate makes Cancer List, says Court

The case is Monsanto Co. v. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment et al., case number 16 CE CG 00183, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Fresno.

RELATED

 

 

Share

FDA must stop Banning Supplements

FDA must stop warning-fda-drugbanning our supplements. The agency needs to step aside and let adults make their own choices. It isn’t doing us any favors by banning treatments we want, or making them difficult or impossible to obtain.

FDA Death Tolls

The FDA admits to helping kill 100,000 people per year with dangerous prescription drugs the agency approved. Others estimate the death toll yearly as much higher, with chemo killing some 50% of the people who take it.

The FDA routinely licenses drugs that kill thousands of people, and at the same time the agency works to ban or make it difficult or impossible to obtain valuable treatments that many people want, such as GcMAF or Intravenous vitamin C. In a free country, people are allowed to make their own health choices about their food and medicine. In our dis-United States, the FDA decides, after taking orders from its Big Pharma paymasters.

Please read george-carlinWhen Healing Becomes a Crime,” the amazing and tragic story of Harry Hoxsey, if you think Americans have any real choice of their own when it comes to cancer treatments. The insurance companies work hand in fist with the FDA and pharmaceutical companies to limit the treatments insurance will cover. “Alternative treatments” – and make no mistake, chemotherapy IS just ONE “alternative treatment,” as much as any other treatment option – are outlawed or banned and/or never paid for by insurance. Insurance companies will pay only for those treatments approved by the multi-billion-dollar cancer industry, which primarily means chemotherapy, which fails or kills an astonishing 97% of its victims. This woeful (even criminal) statistic is not a “conspiracy” or a “theory” of any kind. It is a solid, incontrovertible FACT, and it is merely a blinding glimpse of the obvious. This is not how things are supposed to work in a free country. If you were successful 3% of the time at your job, would you still have that job?  If we spent hundreds of billions of dollars to educate you, and then you were still unsuccessful 97% of the time, would you still have a job? You might, if you were running a chemotherapy cancer center.

Get Drug Makers out of the FDA
By licensing drugs that kill, and denying Americans access to effective, inexpensive treatments that work, NoFDA.se estimates the FDA kills some 800,000 US citizens a year.

Drain the Swamp?
Founded in 1930, FDA employs 6,000 people. Its largest of 40 Washington offices is located at White Oak, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993. If President Trump is at all serious about “draining the swamp” as he promised, the FDA is a good place to start. The CDC would be a good place to continue the draining.

FDA directors are typically former pharmaceutical company lawyers or executives. A revolving door allows drug industry insiders to move back and forth between employment with Big Pharma corporations (like Merck and Pfizer) and the FDA. This agency is supposed to be the regulatory industry for the very drug makers they end up simply promoting and protecting, whether by approving the latest dangerous or unnecessary drugs, or the latest dubious vaccines – such as the so-called shingles vaccine and the ill-fated Gardasil vaccine.

The revolving employment door lets Big Pharma control its own licensing. This is why Merck’s Vioxx, for example, killed an estimated 500,000 Americans, and why Avandia killed some 83,000 before the FDA re-licensed it to continue killing in February 2010. Opiods have killed at least 194,000. Chemotherapy, meanwhile, continues to be the reigning King of failed cancer treatments. This radiation poisoning and burning “therapy” has horrifically maimed and killed some 9 million human beings since the year 2,000. Though it fails an astonishing 97 percent of the time, it remains the go-to treatment for the medical mafia that runs the country. This colossal failure of a shell game couldn’t continue without steady help from the FDA and most of the mainstream media. No-nothing anchor heads shamelessly continue to promote dangerous drugs, medical devices, and failed cancer treatments.

FDA promotes Big Pharma “Cures”
The FDA is entrusted with protecting the lives of US citizens. What the agency does instead, first and foremost, is protect the obscene profit margins of multi-national drug companies that sell Americans dubious or unnecessary drugs at wildly inflated prices. The FDA is nothing short of a serial abuser in this rancid arrangement.

FDA Corruption

Search “FDA corrupt” into any search engine (but beware of censorship from Google, which has just delisted NaturalNews.com’s 140,000 pages. Natural News tended to attack the Big Pharma agenda, and blow the whistle on the whole shadowy, incestuous regulatory-industry scheme.  Search “FDA corrupt” and you will see a sad mountain of examples of FDA corruption and abuse of public trust.

There is no question the FDA is acting criminally. Psychopaths have lurked (Dr. Julie Gerberding) and must still lurk among its directors. Psychically healthy people cannot injure or kill others without remorse.

The FDA as Murder Incorporated – Chemo Kills
The FDA has concealed, or banned, a dozen inexpensive, natural but successful treatments for cancer. None has side effects. they are listed at chemokills.info. The agency’s aim is simply to drive people into the poison of chemotherapy, which costs $60,000 a round. Chemo makes Big Pharma $200 Billion a year in revenue. According to the Journal of Clinical Oncology, who studied 15,000 patients, chemo is successful in just 2.3% of cases.

FDA bans, steals GcMAF
The FDA has concealed a promising cancer treatment – GcMAF – from the public for 25 years. This amazing substance, created from the human body’s own immune system material, has been researched by at least 300 scientists. Some 150 scientific papers have been written of its wonders. More than 11,000 patients are on it now. It has no side effects. It represents 1% of the cost of chemotherapy. Studies have shown it can save some 60% of the cancer victims who use it. The FDA has now closed down the supply on both sides of the Atlantic, using their surrogate, the MHRA, in England. See www.mhracorrupt.st. Some doctors who have used it have had their offices raided and have then turned up dead – Jeffrey Bradstreet, to name one. Coincidence? Follow the money. Could a $200 billion dollar industry disappear without a fight?

FDA as Gestapo for Big Pharma Profits
The FDA has taken control of supplements, attempting to ban them when possible. Everyone who has studied the subject knows that minerals and nutrients can do far more good for human health than drugs. Consequently, in 2011, FDA deliberately misinterpreted the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) with a draft guidance aimed at crippling, or eliminating the supplement industry. They raided Dr. Jonathan Wright’s clinic (in Kent, Seattle) and other clinics at gunpoint, to make sure the industry complied.

This is not the way things are supposed to work in a democracy, in a free country.

FDA must stop Banning Supplements

The FDA are the largest of hundreds of bodies in the 2.9 billion dollar Big Pharma lobbying system. The FDA is controlled by Big Pharma with former or soon-to-be Big Pharma employees stepping back through the revolving door. The FDA does Big Pharma’s bidding. It spreads disinformation to keep their profits at the hundreds of billion dollar level, just as the CDC spreads disinformation for Big Pharma and the vaccine industry. Say what you will about vaccination, it is not as safe as advertised; all objections to mercury and other toxic adjuvants are swept under the table or attacked by Big Pharma shills that control mainstream media discourse.

The FDA’s criminal activities make it a far more effective killing machine than the US Army.

Dead Doctors don’t Lie

Starting withbradstreet-rfk-jr Dr. Jeff Bradstreet, and including Dr. Nicholas Gonzales (heart attacked), more than four dozen doctors who were successful without using drugs or chemotherapy, have been found dead in the last year or so. These healthcare practitioners all had one thing in common: they were all a threat to drug industry  and chemo “therapy” profits. Many were killed within a week of an FDA raid. Coincidence? It is all coincidence if you read the endless reams of disinformation and fake news that dominate the mainstream media and the web. We can give you 200 billion reasons why it won’t all wash away as coincidence. It won’t wash away as easily as Dr. Bradstreet’s body after he allegedly shot himself and then jumped into a river, just days after having seen his autistic son graduate from high school.

Money doesn’t talk.  It screams

John Lennon famously said, “Money doesn’t talk, it screams.” Money has never screamed louder than it does now, when anyone threatens a multi-billion dollar industry. Just ask Mike Adams at Natural News. If Mr. Adams was such a no-nothing person as all of his detractors now claim (while he is unable to defend himself, having been virtually banned by Google), then why did the censorship giant find it necessary to disappear him and his 140,000 pages from the web?  If Dr. Jeffrey Bradstreet was such a “controversial” quack as to be completely unsuccessful in treating everything from cancer to autism – as the New York Times (fake left) and the Wall Street Journal (fake right) would have us believe – then why was it necessary to murder him? For there is no question but that Dr. Bradstreet was murdered.

Down the Rabbit Hole
Go down the rabbit hole yourself and find out what is really going on in this world. But beware of false prophets (or profits), and the countless paths of disinformation which now dominate any serious discussion that regards our health.

The devil comes in many disguises. That quietest voice is God’s own, is our own, and that is the voice of truth. We had better hear that one. We had all better hear that one, before it is too late for this civilization.

God helps us all to the light and the truth. Amen.

RELATED

Share

Film blows Whistle on Vaccine Fraud

When Merck’s vaxxedMMR vaccine was shown to raise the risk of autism for African American males, the CDC did not inform parents or their doctors. The CDC moved instead to cover up the problem. We may never have learned the truth at all, except that a former CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, blew the whistle on the CDC’s rank corruption. Dr. Thompson applied for whistleblower status and then filed a whistleblower lawsuit. Congress has not been moved to act, but the episode has lead to a film which also blows the whistle on vaccine fraud: VAXXED: From Coverup to Catastrophe.

Related: Shingles Vaccine? Really?

Government Derailed
The government has since done nothing to correct the fraud, though the Obama administration granted whistleblower status to Dr. William Thompson in 2014. A senior epidemiologist at the CDC, Dr. Thompson co-authored and published research on the MMR vaccine for the CDC in 2004. As an official whistleblower, he would be immune to prosecution for his testimony to Congress. So why has he not been called? Why has nothing been done? Why has vaccination fraud been allowed to stand, while rates of forced vaccination increase?

Dr. Julie Gerberding works CDC-Merck Revolving Door
Dr. Julie Gerberding was CDC director when the falsified study was published. Dr. Gerberding then left the CDC to become president of Merck’s vaccine division. She is now an executive vice president for Merck, which is now the sole maker of the measles vaccine. The revolving door she walked through between regulation and industry is the portal of corruption.  Another name for it is regulatory capture. (Michael R. Taylor has performed the same duplicitous function for Monsanto.)

Government fails US
The U.S. government’s vaccine-epidemicresponse has been a complete failure to act on this damning information. But even a lack of action can be telling. The government and the CDC have thus proven beyond any doubt that any information not consistent with existing vaccine policy will not be shared, or even tolerated. We see clearly that the profits of vaccine manufacturers and vaccine policy are valued over human lives.

CDC: Big Pharma Cheerleader
This shameful episode should prove to anyone with a pulse that the CDC works not for Americans but for international drug companies. For Big Pharma, the CDC religiously functions as a vaccination cheerleader, always spreading the gospel to penitents. The CDC without fail promotes and defends vaccine policy, which is mostly written by Big Pharma lobbyists, those ‘tight’ with people like Julie Gerberding.

Film blows Whistle on Vaccine Fraud
The whole sordid story is captured and explored in the film VAXXED: From Catastrophe to Coverup. That’s why this film is so dangerous. That’s why it has been so roundly attacked by the Corpocracy, the unholy government-business alliance which determines vaccine policy, and lets people like Gerberding regulate themselves.

Big Pharma Press Minions Attack Vaccine Safety Film
Big Pharma (Merck, Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, etc.) and their mainstream press minions sensed a threat to vaccine profits of some $52 billion per year. The “free press” moved quickly to neutralize the film, to censor it, to destroy it and anyone associated with it. International drug companies and their mainstream media minions all know Big Pharma is the world’s single biggest source of advertising revenue. Broadcasters and “journalists” who don’t understand that don’t have a job in major media.

Trump for Truth?
Say what you will about Donald Trump, he has been the only Presidential candidate of the last 50 years to question the enormous load of vaccines now pumped into tiny babies to allegedly grant them lifelong immunity from countless diseases, including those for which they are not at risk, like hepatitis B, a sexually transmitted disease.

How the World Works, or Doesn’t
If we’ve learned nothing else from the acrid political environment in our age of anger, perhaps we’ve learned this: Name calling is not the answer. The truth is not served by calling anyone a ‘vaccine profiteer’ (however the shoe may fit) or an ‘anti-vaxxer’ or any other name. One does need to do some research of one’s own to discover some basic truths. All must at least begin with some basic understanding of how the world works, or doesn’t.

RELATED

Share

Roundup causes Liver Disease

Roundup causes Monsantolandliver disease. State-of-the-art molecular profiling analyses has shown that Monsanto’s weedkiller Roundup causes liver damage at doses allowed by regulators.

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease 
A new peer-reviewed study shows Roundup causes non-alcoholic fatty liver disease at doses permitted by regulators worldwide. The study is the first to demonstrate a causative link between Roundup consumption at a real-world environmentally relevant dose and a serious disease.

Dr. Michael Antoniou, King’s College London

Led by Dr. Michael Antoniou at King’s College London, the study used cutting-edge profiling methods to describe the molecular composition of female rats’ livers after therats were fed an extremely low dose of Roundup weedkiller for more than two years.  The glyphosate dose from the Roundup given rats was thousands of times below the level permitted by regulators all over the world. Animals in the study suffered from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Roundup and Liver Disease Causative Link
Dr Antoniou said: “The findings of our study are very worrying as they demonstrate for the first time a causative link between an environmentally relevant level of Roundup consumption over the long-term and a serious disease – namely non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. (Our) results suggest regulators should reconsider the safety evaluation of glyphosate-based herbicides.”

Potentially serious Implications for Humans
The new results demonstrated that long-term consumption of an extremely low dose of Roundup at a daily glyphosate intake of only four (4) nanograms per kilogram of bodyweight per day – 75,000 times below EU and 437,500 below US permitted levels – resulted in NAFLD.

Rat Studies mirror Human Reactions
Regulators worldwide accept that toxicity studies in rats fairly indicate human health risks. This study consequently raises alarms for humans exposed to even tiny doses of glyphosate.

25% U.S. affected by NAFLD
NAFLD already affects 25% of the US population. Risk factors include being overweight or obese, having diabetes, high cholesterol, or high triglycerides (a constituent of body fat) in the blood. Some people, however, develop NAFLD even without any of these known risk factors, which raises the question of whether Roundup exposure is an unrecognized risk factor.

NAFLD Symptoms
Symptoms of NAFLD include fatigue, weakness, weight loss, appetite loss, nausea, abdominal pain, spider-like blood vessels, yellowing of the skin and eyes (jaundice), itching, fluid build-up, swelling of legs and abdomen, mental confusion.

NAFLD can progress to the more serious condition of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which causes liver swelling to the point of damage. Most with NASH are 40 – 60, and it is more common in women than men. NASH is one of the leading causes of cirrhosis in U.S. adults, and some 25% of adults with NASH may have cirrhosis.

Study Background
Rat body tissues used in the Antoniou study were obtained from a previous study led by Prof Gilles-Eric Séralini of the University of Caen, France. In Prof. Séralini’s original investigation, rats were for two years given drinking water containing an extremely low, environmentally relevant dose of a commercial Roundup formulation at 0.1ppb (parts per billion)/50ppt (parts per trillion) glyphosate. Daily intake of glyphosate from the Roundup was four (4) nanograms per kilogram of body weight per day, thousands of times less than levels regulators permit.

Analysis of the organs and blood/urine biochemical levels in the original study by Prof Séralini suggested a higher incidence of liver and kidney damage in the animals given Roundup compared to controls given plain drinking water.

Dr Antoniou’s group has conducted distinct followup investigations on the rat body tissues from this ultra-low-dose Roundup treatment group, using in-depth molecular analytical procedures and statistical analytical methods calibrated to fit this type of research.

Atranscriptomics (gene function profile) performed on the livers and kidneys from the female animals strongly supported the observations made at an anatomical (organ) and blood/urine biochemical level in the Séralini study, namely that the Roundup-fed animals’ organs suffered more structural and functional damage than the control animals given plain water.

Roundup-fed animals Transcriptomics results showed increased incidence in:
•   fibrosis (scarring)
•   necrosis (areas of dead tissue)
•   phospholipidosis (disturbed fat metabolism)
•   damage to mitochondria (the centres of respiration in cells)

Transcriptomics analysis can predict organ health or disease status, but does not provide definitive proof of harm. It does not give a direct biochemistry measure of the organ studied. Alterations in gene function resulting from a test do not always result in physical composition changes that could lead to disease.

Now we shall stand by and wait for Monsanto to attack these researchers and their research.  This study is not good news for the toxic chemical king. Roundup has already been found to raise the risk of leukemia and other cancers.

RELATED

Share

Shingles Vaccine contaminated with Glyphosate

Got glyphosate?Zostovax  It comes at no extra charge with your shingles vaccination, and several other vaccinations as well. Shingles and other vaccine batches have widely been found to be contaminated with glyphosate. A probable carcinogen banned in France and many other civilized countries, glyphosate has recently been found in several different shingles vaccine batches.  Glyphosate is not listed in shingles (Zostavax) vaccine ingredients, a violation even of the lax law the U.S. government lays down for the vaccine industry it promotes and protects. The U.S. is busy now seeding the Zika (hoax) Vaccine Industry.

Realted: Shingles Vaccine? Really?

Glyphosate in Shingles, MMR, Hep B, Tetanus, Flu Vaccines
Mosanto’s pesticide has been found not only in the shingles vaccine, but in several other vaccines as well, including MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) vaccine; Diptheria, Tetanus, Pertussis; Hepatitis B, (Pneumonococcus); Influenza; Varicella, Chicken Pox.

Glyphosate in Peer Reviewed Research Papers
The glyphosate contamination was found by scientist Anthony Samsel, who has published five previous peer-reviewed research papers on glyphosate. Mr. Samsel examined multiple vaccines from several different manufacturers and laboratories looking at the same vaccines. He was not simply looking at a single dose. He looked at vaccines that included gelatin.

Zostovax Glyphosate Contamination

Merck’s Zostovax Shingles vaccine is contaminated with glyphosate at 2.9 parts per billion (ppb). MMR vaccine was found to be contaminated with glyphosate. GSK’s Hep B virus was contaminated with glyphosate. The flu vaccine is contaminated with glyphosate. Most of the vaccines he examined were contaminated with glyphosate. Mr. Samsel found glyphosate-contaminated vaccines from all the big vaccine masters, including Merck, Sanofi-Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Wyeth.

Mr. Samsel surmised that most of the glyphosate was bioaccumulated from bone, which is used as gelatin in the vaccines.

Mr. Samsel and Stephanie Seneff have just gotten their fifth peer reviewed paper on Glyphosate published: “Glyphosate pathways to modern diseases V: Amino acid analogue of glycine in diverse proteins”. The glyphosate vaccine contamination research will be published in their sixth peer-reviewed paper on glyphosate.

Glyphosate Vaccine Contamination Pathway
One possible explanation for the contamination is the animal “byproducts” used in the vaccines. Vaccine batch makers sometimes use animal byproducts such as chicken egg protein or gelatine, which comes from bones. In addition, if those vaccine makers are using animals slaughtered via factory farms, then chances are they were fed GMOs and other glyphosate-tainted feed. Those tortured animals could then pick up Glyphosate in their systems, just as human animals do, to the great detriment of their gut health. Egg protein and gelatine made from these animals may consequently also contain glyphosate, which could then contaminate vaccines that are laced with these GMO products.  This delivery system can consequently trigger a cascade of health problems and diseases, including cancer.

Anthony Samsel, however, made no such claims. He simply gathered information that showed glyphosate contamination in the vaccines. He collected vast samples of these popular vaccines, had them tested by multiple U.S. labs for glyphosate, and found that most were largely contaminated by it.

Shingles Vaccine contaminated with Glyphosate

Mr. Samsel alerted his U.S. Senator, as well as several U.S. Government and international organizations such as CDC, FDA and WHO.  The World Health Organization in 2015 declared glyphosate a probable carcinogen. Significantly,  glyphosate is the only active ingredient declared in Roundup, which is far more toxic than glyphosate alone, as Roundup features several adjuvants in the mix. Glyphosate is never used by itself, so it is highly likely that many or all of the other ingredients of Roundup can also be found in vaccines.

RELATED

Doctors oppose Vaccinations

Will the vaccine profiteers and apologists kill all the doctors who have not only refused to jump on the vaccination bandwagon, but who are telling everybody else to get the hell off of it?  The murder of Dr. James Bradstreet has fortunately not stopped many doctors from speaking the truth about the harms of vaccination.

Quotes from VacLib.org:

Quotes from Doctors Regarding Vaccination

“The greatest lie ever told is that vaccines are safe and effective.” – Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz

“The chief, if not the sole cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination.” – Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President, International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital

“Vaccines are highly dangerous, have never been adequately studied or proven to be effective, and have a poor risk/reward ratio.” – Dr. Allen Greenberg, MD

“In my medical career I’ve treated vaccinated and unvaccinated children and the unvaccinated children are far healthier than the vaccinated ones.” – Dr. Philip Incao, MD

“I found the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics and study the instances of these diseases you will realize that this is not so.” – Dr. Archivides Kalokerinos, MD

“It is dangerously misleading to say that vaccines make us “immume” or protect against disease, when in fact that is the exact opposite of the truth. Vaccines only drive disease deeper and cause us to harbor it chronically.” – Dr. Richard Moscowitz, MD

“The vaccinations are not working and they are dangerous. We should be working with nature.” – Dr. Lendon Smith, MD

“There is no scientific evidence that vaccinations are of any benefit, but it is clear that they cause a great deal of harm.” – Dr. Gerhard Buchwald, MD

“All vaccines are and have been causing ischemic (impaired blood flow) damage – to all – creating a plethora of chronic illnesses, disease, and in some instances, death. The injury from vaccination is additive; each vaccination further injures.” – Dr. Andrew Moulden MD, PhD

“When you impair the brain blood flow by vaccination you can impair the respiration control center which can result in death. We call it SIDS.” – Dr. Andrew Moulden MD, PhD

“Vaccination is the most dangerous medical practice in the history of classical medicine.” – Dr. Sladjana Velkov (Macedonia)

[With vaccination] “what in reality is prevented is not the disease but the ability of our cellular immune system to manifest, to respond to and to overcome the disease! There is no system of the human being, from mind to muscles to immune system, which gets stronger through avoiding challenges, but only through overcoming challenges.” – Dr. Philip Incao, MD

“I have lectured all over the world… I have always had a special interest in newspapers. All of them have one thing in common, there is always some reference made to some epidemic in some part of the world. For instance, two years ago, one paper referred to a polio epidemic in Holland. For the past three years, our newspapers have commented on the diphtheria epidemic in Russia. By these means, the population is constantly threatened with epidemics, they have been made to fear them, and the reports always conclude: “Go and get vaccinated.” – Dr. Gerhard Buchwald, MD

“To create fear among parents to strengthen their motivation to vaccinate is an important part of the publicity used to promote vaccinations. A whole branch of research is examining the question: What level of fear needs to be created to appear as convincing as possible?” – Dr. Gerhard Buchwald, MD

“In 1866, an English physician described a very strange illness. Children looked like Mongols. His name was Down. That’s why we call it Down’s Syndrome today… I should add that this syndrome is a result of the vaccinations carried throughout England by Jenner in 1796… It (Down’s Syndrome) is probably the first congenital disease caused by vaccinations. In Germany, the first child with evidence of Down’s Syndrome was reported in 1922. Today, one in every 700 newborns has it.” – Dr. Gerhard Buchwald, MD

“There is insufficient evidence to support routine vaccination of healthy persons of any age.” – Dr. Paul Frame, MD, Journal of Family Practice

“Only after realizing that routine immunizations were dangerous did I achieve a substantial drop in infant death rates.” – Dr. Archivides Kalokerinos, MD

“I’ll talk about vaccines. Number one, vaccines make people sick. They don’t work. They don’t protect. The use of vaccines is totally wrong! It’s perfect nonsense based on fear. They are dangerous. One child out of five has overwhelming disabilities from vaccines – neurological problems, seizures. I’ve got a whole list. There are plenty of books on this subject. Doctors don’t even read about this.” – Dr. Guylaine Lanctot, MD

“During those 30 years I have run against so many histories of little children who had never seen a sick day until they were vaccinated and who, in the several years that have followed, have never seen a well day since. I couldn’t put my finger on the disease they have. They just weren’t strong. Their resistance was gone. They were perfectly well before they were vaccinated. They have never been well since.” – Dr. William Howard Hay, MD

“Nobody needs to be confused but everybody better be darn well frightened about taking any vaccine, under any circumstance, for any reason, at any time in their life.” – Dr. Daniel H. Duffy Sr., DC (retired air force officer – 21 yrs., family doctor – 28 yrs., vaccination researcher – 49 yrs.)

“I vaccinated both my children with the MMR jab, but this was before I started my research into the problems associated with it. Knowing what I know now, I would not vaccinate my children and run the risk of them getting diabetes, asthma, eczema, becoming more susceptible to meningitis and ending up chronically disabled.” – Dr. Jayne Donegan, GP, Homeopath

“Had my mother and father known that the poliovirus vaccines of the 1950s were heavily contaminated with more than 26 monkey viruses, including the cancer virus SV40, I can say with certainty that they would not have allowed their children and themselves to take those vaccines. Both of my parents might not have developed cancers suspected of being vaccine-related, and might even be alive today.” – Dr. Howard B. Urnovitz, PhD, CEO, CSO and co-founder of Chronix Biomedical

“Childhood vaccines are giving us a world of chronic illness: autism, developmental disorders, Asperger’s Syndrome, brain tumors, leukemia, cancers, information processing disorders, impulsive violence, allergies, asthma, diabetes, Crohn’s disease, intestinal disorders, are just some of the vaccine associated disorders.” – Dr. Tedd Koren, DC

“I am no longer trying to dig up evidence to prove vaccines cause autism. There is already abundant evidence. This debate is not scientific but is political.” Dr. David Ayoub, MD

“There are at least seven laboratory studies, clinical studies, of blood, cerebral, spinal fluid, biopsies of autistic children which show huge differences between autistic children and normal children in terms of the presence of things like measles vaccine virus in their intestinal tract, for example, or their neurons. So, there’s one line of evidence. Another, of course, is that we have data from thousands of parents who testify, often with videotapes and photographs and eyewitness reports, that their kid was perfectly normal. And they can demonstrate it, as I say, very conclusively with tapes, until after the vaccine. The kid retreated into autism. There’s just converging evidence from many, many directions.” – Dr. Bernard Rimland, PhD, Founder and Former Director of the Autism Research Institute

“When the link between the use of unsafe, mercury-laden vaccine and autism, ADHD, asthma, allergies and diabetes becomes undeniable, mainstream medicine will be sporting a huge, self-inflicted and well-deserved black eye. Then will come the billion-dollar awards, by enraged juries, to the children and their families.” – Dr. Bernard Rimland, PhD, founder and former director of the Autism Research Institute

“The greatest threat to our health today is the medical community, and one of their most dangerous tools is vaccination – particularly the horrific procedure of injecting foreign protein into newborn infants!” – Dr. Daniel H. Duffy, DC

The greatest threat of childhood diseases lies in the dangerous and ineffectual efforts made to prevent them through mass immunization… There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease.” – Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, MD

“We are taught by the authorities that vaccines protect us against eventual aggressive viruses and microbes, and, therefore, prevent contagious illnesses and epidemics. This lie has been perpetuated for 150 years despite the ineffectiveness of vaccines in protecting against illnesses.” – Dr. Guylaine Lanctot, MD

“My suspicion, which is shared by others in my profession, is that the nearly 10,000 SIDS deaths that occur in the United States each year are related to one or more of the vaccines that are routinely given children. The pertussis vaccine is the most likely villain, but it could also be one or more of the others.” – Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, MD

“Many here voice a silent view that the Salk and Sabin Polio Vaccines, being made from monkey kidney tissue, have been directly responsible for the major increase in leukaemia in this country.” – Dr. Fred Klenner, MD

“As a clinician, my current belief which guides my practice with these children is that any child given the Hep B vaccination at birth and subsequent boosters along with DPT has received unacceptable levels of neurotoxin in the form of the ethyl mercury in the thimerosal preservative used in the vaccine. In any child with a genetic immune susceptibility (probably about one in six) this sets off a series of events that injure the brain-gut-immune system. By the time they are ready to receive the MMR vaccination, their immune system is so impaired in a great number of these children that the triple vaccine cannot be handled by the now dysfunctional immune system and they begin their obvious descent into the autistic spectrum disorder.” – Dr. Jaquelyn McCandless, MD

“In 1976 I was working in the Gulf Country around Cape York, in an aboriginal community of about 300 people. The Health Department sent around a team and vaccinated about 100 of them against flu. Six were dead within 24 hours or so and they weren’t all old people, one man being in his early twenties. They threw the bodies in trucks to take to the coast where autopsies were done. It appeared they had died from heart attacks.” – Dr. Archie Kalokerinos, MD

“As a retired physician, I can honestly say that unless you are in a serious accident, your best chance of living to a ripe old age is to avoid doctors and hospitals and learn nutrition, herbal medicine and other forms of natural medicine unless you are fortunate enough to have a naturopathic physician available. Almost all drugs are toxic and are designed only to treat symptoms and not to cure anyone. Vaccines are highly dangerous, have never been adequately studied or proven to be effective, and have a poor risk/reward ratio. Most surgery is unnecessary and most textbooks of medicine are inaccurate and deceptive. Almost every disease is said to be idiopathic (without known cause) or genetic – although this is untrue. In short, our main stream medical system is hopelessly inept and/or corrupt. The treatment of cancer and degenerative diseases is a national scandal. The sooner you learn this, the better off you will be.” – Dr. Alan Greenberg, MD

“According to the records of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, from 1911 to 1935 the four leading causes of childhood deaths from infectious diseases in the U.S.A. were diptheria, pertussis, scarlet fever, and measles. However, by 1945 the combined death rates from these causes had declined by 95% before the implementation of mass vaccine programs.” – Dr. Harold Buttram, MD

“I would consider the risks associated with measles vaccination unacceptable even if there were convincing evidence that the vaccine works. There isn’t. …. In 1900 there were 13.3 measles deaths per 100,000 population. By 1955, before the first measles shot, the death rate had declined 97.7 percent to only 0.03 deaths per 100,000.” – Dr. Mendelsohn, MD

“Up to 90% of the total decline in the death rate of children between 1860 and 1965, because of whooping cough, scarlet fever, diptheria, and measles, occurred before the introduction of immunizations and antibiotics.” – Dr Archie Kalokerinos, MD

“What the vaccinators don’t tell you is that communicable diseases have been declining at a steady rate for 150 years and that there is no relationship between the various diseases and the onset of immunization. Without exception, the vaccine program for each of the childhood diseases was inaugurated after that paticular diseases had begun to disappear. Contrary to what you have been told, this includes polio. What the vaccines have done is cause the various childhood diseases to become adulthood diseases – with far more serious implications, mumps in men and rubella in women for example.” – Dr. William Douglass, MD

“For thirty years kids died from smallpox vaccinations even though no longer threatened by the disease.” – Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, MD

“I am and have been for years a confirmed anti-vaccinationist. Anti-vaccination has no backing from the orthodox medical opinion. A medical man who expresses himself against vaccination loses caste. Tremendous pecuniary interests too have grown around vaccination.” – Mahatma Gandhi

“I have no faith in vaccination; I look upon it with the greatest possible disgust, and firmly believe that it is often the medium of conveying many filthy and loathsome diseases from one child to another, and no protection whatever against smallpox. Indeed, I consider we are now living in the Jennerian epoch for the slaughter of innocents, and the unthinking portion of the adult population.” – Dr. W.J. Collins, MD, BS, BSc, MRCS

“What people don’t know about vaccines –what most doctors don’t know– but well demonstrated in medical literature, is that vaccines shift your immune system to an immune suppression type of state called the “TH2 shift.” That’s what most vaccines do. They shift your immune system to a weaker, antibody type immune system… If you’re injecting people with so many vaccines that your keeping them in this constant state –that now your switching everyone to this TH2 immune suppression– then everyone becomes more susceptible [to infectious diseases]… and no one is talking about that. Now, a lot of scientists know that, but they are afraid to speak out because their careers would be ruined.” – Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD

“Using kids as guinea pigs in potentially harmful vaccine experiments is every parents’ worst nightmare. This actually happened in 1989-1991 when Kaiser Permanente of Southern California and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) jointly conducted a measles vaccine experiment. Without proper parental disclosure, the Yugoslavian-made “high titre” Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine was tested on 1,500 poor, primarily black and Latino, inner city children in Los Angeles. Highly recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), the high-potency experimental vaccine was previously injected into infants in Mexico, Haiti, and Africa. It was discontinued in these countries when it was discovered that the children were dying in large numbers.” – Dr. Alan Cantwell MD

“There is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza. The producers of these vaccines know that they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.” – Dr. J. Anthony Morris, Former Chief Vaccine Control Officer, US FDA

“My own personal view is that vaccines are unsafe and worthless. I will not allow myself to be vaccinated again. Vaccines may be profitable but in my view, they are neither safe nor effective.” – Dr. Vernon Coleman, MB, ChB, DSc (Hon)

“I once believed in Jenner; I once believed in Pasteur. I believed in vaccination. I believed in vivisection. But I changed my views as the result of hard thinking.” – Dr. Walter Hadwen, MD, LSA, MRCS, LRCP, MB

“Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with at least two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.” – Dr. W. B. Clarke

“No long-term safety testing for the influenza vaccine has ever been done. They are experimenting on our lives and our children. Influenza vaccine is an experimental vaccine. ” – Dr. Mark Geier, MD, PhD

“There is a great deal of evidence to prove that immunization of children does more harm than good.” – Dr. J. Anthony Morris, Former Chief Vaccine Control Officer, US FDA

“The only safe vaccine is one that is never used.” – Dr. James A. Shannon, MD, Former Director, National Institutes of Health (1955-1968)

“Belief in immunization is a form of delusional insanity.” – Dr Herbert Shelton, MD

“I don’t think measles poses any risk to a healthy child.” – Dr Jay Gordon, MD

“I sincerely believe that vaccines cause more harm to the health of the individual than the “protection” and “benefit” they are proclaimed to provide. Staying healthy without vaccines is not only possible, but being vaccine-free is the only way to maintain a lifetime of real health.” – Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO

“Nothing but the natural ignorance of the public, countenanced by the inoculated erroneousness of the ordinary general medical practitioners, makes such a barbarism as vaccination possible. Recent developments have shown that an inoculation made in the usual general practitioner’s light-hearted way, without previous highly skilled examination of the state of the patient’s blood, is just as likely to be a simple manslaughter as a cure or preventive. But vaccination is nothing short of attempted murder. A skilled bacteriologist would just as soon think of cutting his child’s arm and rubbing the contents of the dustpan into the wound, as vaccinating.” – George Bernard Shaw

“The more it (vaccination) is supported by public authorities, the more will its dangers and disadvantages be concealed or denied.” – M. Beddow Bayly

“One vaccine decreases cell-mediated immunity by 50%, two vaccines by 70%… all triple vaccines (MMR, DTaP) markedly impair cell-mediated immunity, which predisposes to recurrent viral infections, especially otitis media, as well as yeast and fungi infections.” – Dr H.H. Fudenberg, Immunologist

“Autism may be a disorder linked to the disruption of the G-alpha protein, affecting retinoid receptors in the brain. A study of sixty autistic children suggests that autism may be caused by inserting a G-alpha protein defect, the pertussis toxin found in the D.P.T. vaccine, into genetically at-risk children.” – Mary N. Megson, M.D.

“Probably 20% of American children -one youngster in five- suffers from ‘development disability’. This is stupefying figure we have inflicted on ourselves…’development disabilities’ are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the USA and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of millions of US children and adults suffering from autism, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia… owe their disorders to one or another of the vaccines against childhood diseases.” – Harris Coulter PhD, Author, “Vaccination, Social Violence & Criminality: The Medical Assault on the American Brain”

“Childhood diseases are a far less serious threat than having a large fraction of a generation afflicted with learning disability and/or uncontrollable aggressive behavior because of a crusade for universal vaccination…” – Association of American Physicians & Surgeons

“We look at these unvaccinated kids as bright and chipper, and they have good personalities, and they’re easy-going and easy to get along with, and we look at them like they’re just something magical. … When really that’s what normal is supposed to look like.” – Sherri Tenpenny, DO

“Recent evidence indicates that routine childhood vaccinations contribute to the emergence of chronic allergic problems such as eczema, ear infections, and asthma. A growing number of scientists and physicians maintain that most standard vaccinations permanently disturb the developing immune system, setting the stage for hypersensitive reactions to foods and other common substances. In fact, childhood illnesses such as measles, mumps, and whooping cough may actually reduce the risk of allergy.” – Konrad Kail, N.D.

“The incidence of asthma has been found to be five times more common in vaccinated children.” – The Lancet, 1994.

“Provocation polio. That is the truth about those outbreaks of polio. And I offer a well considered personal opinion that polio is a man made disease.” – Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.

“Public health regulators’ main interest is preserving the notion that vaccines help more than they harm. Anything else is blasphemous. For the rest of us, though, a recent review in immunology literature should give pause. It states: ‘To date, more than 80 systemic and organ-specific autoimmune diseases have been defined, and their cumulative burden is substantial, both medically and financially. Furthermore, the burden of autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases is rising, making these diseases a ubiquitous global phenomenon that is predicted to further increase in the coming decades.’ An autoimmune storm is rising. The role of vaccines in it is emerging and will one day be crystal clear. The question is, how far off is that day, and who is going to pay while we wait for it?” – Celeste McGovern

For links to more websites with quotes from doctors regarding vaccines, see VacLib.org

Share

Aspartame Cancer, Obesity, Insanity

The U.S. FDA aspartamewas forced in 1995 – under the Freedom of Information Act – to release a list of aspartame symptoms reported by thousands of victims. FDA had to be forced to report the more than 10,000 consumer complaints it had received about Aspartame, which covered a list of 92 symptoms, including death. Aspartame, in fact, is responsible for more complaints than any other food additive. Aspartame is found (or hidden) in many everyday products, including diet sodas, breath mints, gum, desserts, vitamin supplements, instant coffee, yogurt, and cereals.

Aspartame “Side Effects” Legion

More than 90 “side effects” have been linked to aspartame consumption, including seizures, lupus, brain tumors, cancer, mild rashes. Users have reported adverse effects that include multiple sclerosis, lupus erythematosus, Gulf War Syndrome, brain tumors, epileptic seizures, complications of diabetes. Aspartame also exacerbates or mimics symptoms of fibromyalgia, MS, lupus, ADD, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, chronic fatigue and depression. So why is Aspartame legal?

Do we live in a sane world?

If we lived in a sane world, one not controlled by corporations, their Congressional lackeys and the FDA, aspartame would not be legal, would not be consumed everyday by unwitting human guinea pigs.

Aspartame Ailments Legion
Aspartame has been linked to at least 200 ailments, including Alzheimer’s disease, juvenile diabetes, depression, epileptic seizures, blindness, memory loss, excitability, multiple sclerosis, lupus, weight gain. (The Idaho Observer, November, 2000). Yes, aspartame has even been linked with – wait for it – OBESITY, which is more than mildly ironic, seeing as how the fight against obesity is supposed to be one of this poison’s best selling points. See: Aspartame causes Obesity

Dirty Politics unleashed Aspartame
How did such a horror as aspartame ever get unleashed on us in the first place? It was first introduced as a “food” by Monsanto company GD Searle. Aspartame was foisted on the public with the help of Reagan administration appointees in the 1980s. Former GD Searle president Donald Rumsfeld went through the revolving door between industry and government to help approve it. Rumsfeld was believed to have “earned” $12 million from the sale of Searle to Monsanto. Searle’s profits came largely from the carcinogenic aspartame which Rumsfeld helped shepherd through federal approval.

Monsanto greases Politicians

Former Attorney General John Ashcroft (from the biotech bully’s home state of Missouri) reportedly received $10,000 for his senatorial campaign from Monsanto in the mid 1990s, five times more than Monsanto gave to any other congressional hopeful at the time. Ashcroft and Bush I Supreme Court appointee Clarence Thomas  (once a Monsanto lawyer) were helpful in gaining Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for Monsanto’s cancerous artificial sweetener. Monsanto has always gotten help from Democrats as well.

New Leaked Emails on Rumsfeld’s Aspartame Play
Besides the Clinton foundation scandals and international pedophile rings, John Podesta’s leaked emails have also turned up several damning pieces that confirm collusion between the soda industry and high level officials within the U.S. government, including Hillary Clinton. Mrs. Clinton, like Chief Justice Clarence Thomas, once worked as an attorney for Monsanto.

A recent batch of leaked Podesta and DNC emails discusses Donald Rumsfeld’s involvement in the approval of aspartame. Mr. Rumsfeld “served” as White House chief of staff from 1974 to 1975, and as secretary of defense from 1975 to 1977, and from 2001 to 2006. In 1976, Mr. Rumsfeld became CEO of G.D. Searle & Company, which was trying to get aspartame approved by the FDA.

The FDA declined when it saw evidence that aspartame ate holes through mouse brains. But that didn’t stop Monsanto, Ashcroft, Rumsfeld, Clinton, or Thomas from finding a way to poison us all with aspartame.

Fake News from Washington Post, other MSM Rags
If CIA-sponsored rags like the Washington Post have taught us anything about fake news, it’s that industry money calls the shots. The “truth” is what the money says it is. Money buys the science, or the silence, or whatever it takes to keep corporate profits flowing. If a few million people get fat or lose their memories from aspartame, so be it. Sickness only spawns further opportunities for the medical mafia in the cancer industry. Chemotherapy fails 97% of the time, but that doesn’t stop it from remaining the industry “standard of care,” the only cancer treatment which insurance companies will pay for. Billions and billions of dollars have been spent on this “treatment” that virtually guarantees failure. How many people do you know personally who “failed” chemotherapy? How many do you know who have survived? For how long? (But don’t worry either way, your real experience is only “anecdotal,” easily written off by the “research” which you will never be able to afford yourself. Go stand in line for your chemo.)

Big Pharma Sponsored Research not Credible
Harvard Medical School’s Dr. Marcia Angell wrote a tell-all book,  The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It.  She is a former Editor-in-Chief at the New England Journal of Medicine, one of the most respected medical journals in the world. In the New York Review of Books called “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption,” she calls the respectability of any medical journal into question. Virtually all of the research published in them is sponsored by industry with vested interests in the outcomes of the research.

Ms. Angell wrote:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”

California may ban Aspartame
California, meanwhile, may move to ban aspartame. On November 15, 2016, the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment’s (OEHHA), Carcinogen Identification Committee (CIC) met to decide whether to list aspartame as a carcinogen. They may put it on California’s “Prop 65” list of known carcinogens.

So What? We have to Depopulate.
The FDA did initially tried to prevent approval of Aspartame; but today they are just an extension of industry, or partners with it. Nine FDA scientists wrote Congress and the President in 2009 to blow the whistle. they said the FDA was broken. Around that same time, Michael Delaney of the FDA called Dr. Betty Martini (a longtime campaigner against aspartame) at 2:45 a.m. Dr. Martini confronted Dr. Delaney.  She said, “FDA hasn’t answered my ‘Imminent Health Hazard’ petition on aspartame, and people are sick and dying all over the world.”

Dr. Delaney replied, “So what, we have to depopulate.”

Related

Share

Women not Warned Taxotere causes Permanent Hair Loss

Women in thealopecia-2 U.S. were not warned until 2016 that the chemotherapy drug Taxotere causes permanent hair loss. Women in Europe and Canada, however, were warned as early as 2005. This failure to warn is at the center of Taxotere Lawsuits filed in the United States. American women suffering from permanent hair loss after being Taxotered during chemotherapy treatments all claim in their lawsuits that they would not have consented to being administered the drug if they had known it raised the risk of permanent hair loss or alopecia.

Failure to Warn
Taxotere’s maker Sanofi-Aventis failed to warn American women in order to keep the profits from the drug flowing, according to Taxotere Lawsuit petitions filed against the French-based company. A whistleblower lawsuit brought by a company insider makes a similar claim, along with allegations that Sanofi-Aventis awarded doctors kickbacks to illegally incentivize use of the drug. Taxotere sales increased drastically during this alleged scam to withhold warnings from Americans, climbing from $424 million to $1.4 billion in four years. Consequently, Taxotere’s unnecessary toxicity was administered to thousands of patients when less toxic chemotherapy medications were readily available.

FDA Taxotere Warnings
The FDA did not requirehair-loss Sanofi-Aventis to add a warning about alopecia to Taxotere labeling until Dec. 2015, which means that most women wouldn’t have learned of the warning until well into 2016.  There is always some lag time between FDA pronouncements and their delivery to doctors and their patients. At that time, the agency wrote under “adverse reactions” that “Postmarketing Experience” showed “Cases of permanent alopecia have been reported.”  (emphasis ours)

That alopecia warning came much too late for thousands of American women who  now suffer from permanent baldness.

Other FDA Warnings on Taxotere

  • November 2014 – alcohol content could lead to intoxication
  • December 2013 – Eye Disorders: Cystoid macular edema (CME) has been reported in patients treated with TAXOTERE and other taxanes. For metabolism and nutrition disorders, cases of hyponatremia reported.
  • June 2013 – Respiratory: dyspnea, acute pulmonary edema, acute respiratory distress syndrome/pneumonitis, interstitial lung disease, interstitial pneumonia, respiratory failure, and pulmonary fibrosis have rarely been reported and may be associated with fatal outcome. Rare cases of radiation pneumonitis have been reported in patients receiving concomitant radiotherapy.
  • May 2010 – Warnings for Use in Children (see the FDA safety info.)

April 2010 Summary View includes Renal Failure
Adverse reactions in post-marketing experiences included Scleroderma-like changes usually preceded by peripheral lymphedema, along with renal failure, most often associated with concomitant nephrotoxic drugs

Taxotere in Drug Combinations Cautioned
FDA also concluded that concomitant use of Taxotere and drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 may increase exposure to docetaxel and should be avoided. In patients receiving treatment with Taxotere, close monitoring for toxicity and a Taxotere dose reduction could be considered if systemic administration of a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor cannot be avoided.

Women not Warned Taxotere causes Permanent Hair Loss

Sanofi-Aventis needs to be held accountable for misleading women (which we believe to be the case) into being injected with a drug that significantly raises the risk of permanent baldness. Approximately 10-15% of women who were administered Taxotere during chemotherapy reported zero hair growth for as long as ten years after stopping treatment.

Free Legal Consultation

Contact an experienced drug injury lawyer for a potential Taxotere Lawsuit if you or someone you love suffered permanent baldness after taking chemotherapy treatment.  We offer a no-obligation free legal consultation.

RELATED

Share

Washington State sues Monsanto

Washington is suing monsanto-logoMonsanto over PCB contamination in the state. Monsanto is accused of negligent handling of PCBs. Polychlorinated biphenyls are a banned and highly toxic group of chemicals that Monsanto made for decades. The biotech bully from Missouri has been sued by several cities over PCB contamination, but Washington is the first state to pursue litigation.

Related: Monsanto sued for Roundup Cancer 

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and Attorney General Bob Ferguson announced the lawsuit at a press conference December 10, 2016. It was filed in King County Superior Court in Seattle.

Washington seeks damages on several grounds. They include product liability for Monsanto’s Failure to Warn about PCB dangers; Negligence; Trespass for harming the state’s natural resources, including fish and wildlife.

Monsanto was the only manufacturer of the PCB compound that was used to insulate electronics from 1935 until 1977. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finally banned PCBs in 1979, because of PCBs’ link to birth defects and cancer in laboratory animals. PCBs are also known to trigger adverse skin and liver effects in humans. The toxic chemical also survives to poison everything it touches for many decades.

PCBs contaminate Washington State
“PCBs have been found in bays, rivers, streams, sediment, soil and air throughout Washington state,’ explained AG Bob Ferguson, “with more than 600 suspected or confirmed contamination sites from Puget Sound to the Wenatchee River, Lake Spokane to Commencement Bay.”

Mr. Ferguson said Washington has spent tens of millions of dollars on cleaning up PCB contamination, but the toxic pollutants have nevertheless caused grievous harm to protected salmon and orcas. Washington consequently seeks hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars from Monsanto.

Monsanto hid PCB Dangers – Petition
Similar to others who have sued Monsanto for PCB contamination, Mr. Ferguson further claimed that “Monsanto produced PCBs for decades while hiding what they knew about the toxic chemicals’ harm to human health and the environment.”

Mr. Ferguson said Monsanto’s own documents show the company knew about the dangers of PCBs way back in 1937. One document stated that tests on animals revealed “systemic toxic effects” from prolonged exposure from inhaling PCB fumes or ingesting PCBs.

Monsanto Profits Trump Safety
As the Associated Press reported, in 1969, a Monsanto committee on PCBs declared:

“There is too much customer/market need and selfishly too much Monsanto profit to go out … There is little probability that any action that can be taken will prevent the growing incrimination of specific polychlorinated biphenyls … as nearly global environmental contaminants leading to contamination of human food (particularly fish), the killing of some marine species (shrimp), and the possible extinction of several species of fish eating birds.”

Monsanto lied to New Jersey
Despite sitting on this damning information, Monsanto told the public not to worry. Also in 1969, a Monsanto letter to New Jersey’s Department of Conservation stated: “Based on available data, manufacturing and use experience, we do not believe PCBs to be seriously toxic.”

Cities sue Monsanto
Monsanto also faces similar PCB contamination lawsuits from at least eight other West Coast cities, which include Seattle and Spokane in Washington state; Portland in Oregon; Berkeley, San Diego, San Jose, Oakland, Long Beach in California.

Monsanto spokesman Scott S. Partridge said in a statement to the Associated Press that the “[Washington] case is experimental because it seeks to target a product manufacturer for selling a lawful and useful chemical four to eight decades ago that was applied by the U.S. government, Washington State, local cities, and industries into many products to make them safer.”

Monsanto has usually won in lawsuits filed against it over human illness related to PCBs. But in May 2016, a St. Louis jury awarded $46.5 million in damages to three plaintiffs who claimed PCB exposure caused their non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Washington sues Monsanto

That Washington lawsuit also accuses Monsanto of continuing to sell PCBs even after the company knew the dangers and falsely assured people they were safe.

Related

 

Share